Hardy
Curb is brilliant and a must watch.
And seeing movies by yourself, there's no right or wrong way to do it
Personally, I prefer to see an early showing before the crowds hit, best seats, less obnoxious people, etc. Plus there's usually cheaper matinee prices so that helps.
if its a comedy, ideally it's a crowded theatre or I'm going with friends.
But if it's a drama, I'm watching that **** alone preferably in an empty theatre w no distractions.
Also. Curb is my favorite show ever. Larry's humor is just so my speed man
He's so goddamn neurotic, and with that you either understand those feelings or you don't
I also feel that Hardy is officially in the God tier.
They're are many older actors up there (Daniel Day-Lewis, Gary Oldman, blah blah, you guys know the greats) but what about the younger cats?
It's always so goddamn hard to rank something that's subjective. It's also pointless. And impossible.
But we still have to do it! Because it;s a goddamn good time.
Actors in particular are fun for me to rank and whatnot.
Because takle like Nic Cage, for example. The perfect example, really.
People think he is absolutely AWFUL.
but he was great in Raising Arizona, he was fantastic and hilarious in Adaption.
And the dude KILLED Bad Lieutenant. Like the audacity of that last scene was so goddamn awesome.
And the Academy award? At least, the fact that he won should be considered.
But yeah I turned it off Leaving Las Vegas in 20 minutes bc his character was too much for me.
Or like, let's take James Franco
His eyes are emotionless so I can never suspend my disbelief to let myself fully get into one of his movies.
I'm not drawn to him when he's on the screen
So, there are some examples for why it's so fun to hear different opinions on actors, specifically for me.
Talking about young god level actors though.
There's some people so goddamn captivating and trying to explain why is impossible. Definitely a little je ne sais quoi
Like Humphrey Bogart with his stogie hangin off his lip, it goes beyond reason why some people are so enthralling.
I think Gosling is like Bogart in that way. I saw it in Drive, and Only God Forgives (even if some people think it was an abortion).
Refn summed it up the best: "The thing with Ryan, you can look at him for hours. Very few actors have that. It's a gift."
But I don't think Gosling is god level.
I also don't think Leo Dicaprio is up there
His has these idiosyncrasies that he carries throughout every role, and from what I see it's unintentional
And I don't mean that in a "Denzel Washington kind of way".
I mean it like, it's clearly a lack of skill/depth of his character/effort/whatever you want to call it.
Because his Blood Diamond role and his Calvin Candy should be inherently extremely different
But theey're not. He doesn't take it that far. I can hear his natural vocal habits in every role, so I can't believe he's as good as Hardy.
Let me just say thi he's NEVER been robbed by the Academy.
It was most apparent this year, because he wasn't even the best in the movie he was nominated for.
When Forrest Whitaker won over him, I thought all his peers had better performances but him and Will Smith (Happyness) we're equal.
Hes actually quite similar to Big Wilie (as an actor) for a lot of reasons, now that I think about it.
The biggest case for Leo is the year he was up for The Aviator, but still, I'll take Jamie Foxx as Ray!
And the other time he lost, it was cute and all to nominate the kid, but... c'mon.
Damn that's a lot of words for someone I think doesn't belong.
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
maybe
But his name is always tossed around for "best of his generation", and I just couldn't. agree. less.
He has great range in selecting roles... but that's about where his range ends.
Compare Leo to Tom Hardy, and you see the true mastery of Hardy's work.
Just voice wise (huge part of a character) , I've seen a Slingblade-esque tough guy in Lawless, to Welsh in Locke, to the infamous Bane (I loved it, personally) and then all of his other roles as well.
And then I saw a clip of him in The Drop... I'm like are you ******* kidding me? He's a surgeon with this *****, Jake.
All amazing and all completely separate with zero overlap. That's a testament to his talent and work ethic.
He must not exist as a human being with physical habits and idiosyncrasies because he has to be working with a blank canvas every time he constructs a character.
I imagine Hardy as some gaseous liquid that never manifests into human form until his agent tells it about the next film it will be doing.
Like DDL, and the fact that he's got to be an Animagus with his chameleon *** self. It's disgusting how good he is.
Also at the top with Hardy has to be Bale.
Maybe it's just as simple as the Brits are better than us.
seriously though
Every great thing in America came from across the pond... including, you know... America. ["Love what you've done with the place!" - Russell Brand]
And **** man, at this point, him and Hardy have to be considered accent experts, right? They're in a class of their own, even just talking about vocally it's so apparent.
On one hand you could take away from Bale's physical transformations, bc you see it separate from his performance.
But they're a physical manifestation of his work ethic, and how much he cares about his craft, you can't help but consider what he's done.
You know it's amazing when you don't even recognize a big star.
Joaquin Phoenix. Now this is my guy. My personal favorite.
The scene in The Master with Philip Seymour Hoffman, where it's their first therapy session, is the most powerful I've ever seen.
The strongest physical choices for his character. I am in awe when see a Freddie on screen and then I watch an interview with Joaquin.
The layers of character are infinite!
Im Still Here was like. the coolest and most badass thing ever btw.
Explores celebrity like nothing else, there is no comparison. And to hear him talk about his experience doing it it is worth the listen.
Then go watch Walk the Line- his singing voice!- and everybodys favorite... Gladiator
Michael Fassbender. I don't need to say anything. I know he's got big fans in this thread, and they're probably more familiar with his work as well.
And then?
No one else. They are the holy Trinity, but there are 4 of them...
So what do you guys think?
Who do you think is at the top?
Oh. and just a throw in, because I'm remembering it now.
A while ago someone mentioned ranking the most important aspects of film
To me, the director is at the top without question.
Actors are near the bottom though. If anything the casting director may be more important.