\\ Post Your Car vol. Been a minute //

[mplsdunk]

better to look the same instead of get uglier as they progress. 

 

[mplsdunk]

better to look the same instead of get uglier as they progress. 

 

[JayDean03]

Originally Posted by hollowpoints

Rare moment when my car is clean-I'm lazy...

beautiful wheels bro

 

[JayDean03]

Originally Posted by hollowpoints

Rare moment when my car is clean-I'm lazy...

beautiful wheels bro

 

[hollowpoints]

thanks

 

[hollowpoints]

thanks

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by MPLSdunk

you guys were supposed to agree with me. 

You maaaaad.

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by MPLSdunk

you guys were supposed to agree with me. 

You maaaaad.

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by hollowpoints

Rare moment when my car is clean-I'm lazy...

looks good man. Are those forgestar's?

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by hollowpoints

Rare moment when my car is clean-I'm lazy...

looks good man. Are those forgestar's?

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by JoseBronx

yea I heard about the crappy gas mileage, wanted to buy a shell to swap a VQ or RB but havent found one cheap

Nissan power man do the swap. RB

 

[blacktt3z]

Originally Posted by JoseBronx

yea I heard about the crappy gas mileage, wanted to buy a shell to swap a VQ or RB but havent found one cheap

Nissan power man do the swap. RB

 

[murray497]

Originally Posted by MyJaysGetRocked

Originally Posted by Murray497

Originally Posted by mases apprentice

Audi's deflated 0-60 times are never accurate, and are always more conservative. My 08 RS4 was listed as a 4.8 0-60, while R&T got it at 4.2 seconds. Also, your times are just wrong anyway. 

Please don't take this the wrong way because I've always like the RS4, but it's not doing 4.2 to 60. I understand that R&T *tested* it at 4.2, but 4.8 is the correct figure. 

Not taking it personally, but why do most car magazines and independent testers disagree with that number? 

 

[murray497]

Originally Posted by MyJaysGetRocked

Originally Posted by Murray497

Originally Posted by mases apprentice

Audi's deflated 0-60 times are never accurate, and are always more conservative. My 08 RS4 was listed as a 4.8 0-60, while R&T got it at 4.2 seconds. Also, your times are just wrong anyway. 

Please don't take this the wrong way because I've always like the RS4, but it's not doing 4.2 to 60. I understand that R&T *tested* it at 4.2, but 4.8 is the correct figure. 

Not taking it personally, but why do most car magazines and independent testers disagree with that number? 

 

[ksteezy]

 

[ksteezy]

 

[thapointguy]

Nice ksteezy. Can't go wrong with WDP. I had an 05 not too long ago.
Gone but not forgotten.

 

[thapointguy]

Nice ksteezy. Can't go wrong with WDP. I had an 05 not too long ago.
Gone but not forgotten.

 

[TheGodFresco]

the TL is nice, i still might get one...

 

[TheGodFresco]

the TL is nice, i still might get one...

 

[ksteezy]

thanx fellas, vie considered selling wayyyy too many times.....really want to jump into a grand cherokee Laredo for some reason

 

[ksteezy]

thanx fellas, vie considered selling wayyyy too many times.....really want to jump into a grand cherokee Laredo for some reason

 

[mplsdunk]

Wildin if you wanna get a Jeep now. Unless you barely drive then who cares about gas.

 

[mplsdunk]

Wildin if you wanna get a Jeep now. Unless you barely drive then who cares about gas.

 

[ksteezy]

I don't really drive much anymore, pretty much from work and back home and both my main jobs are within 4 miles of my house...so is no biggie....I think about a jeep every winter