Ron Paul VS Ben Bernanke VOL. da HEAD of da fed doesnt think gold is "money" RIP USA

Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
70,048
Reaction score
24,226
hmmm....this who ya got runnin da fed?
laugh.gif
sick.gif
 
Not an economist by any stretch but... the US dollar is not based on the gold standard anymore. So I don't think Bernanke was inaccurate in saying gold isn't money. Gold has a worth quantified by currency but you can't walk into your local Best Buy and plop down a bullion piece and walk out with a new flatscreen.
 
dude said treasury bills aren't money either but they're assets.

truth is, we haven't dealt with money at all in our lifetimes.

all of it is government sponsored credit.

quicker people realize this, quicker people will stop ignorantly loving what they think is money.
 
I just don't know sometimes.......I like the way that republican dude was putting him on the spot though It shows that there are def people in the political world who SEEM to care about the average person.
 
Originally Posted by Wr

dude said treasury bills aren't money either but they're assets.

truth is, we haven't dealt with money at all in our lifetimes.

all of it is government sponsored credit.

quicker people realize this, quicker people will stop ignorantly loving what they think is money.


So r u saying I basically work my %!% off at two jobs for free.....serious by the way it just irks me that I work hard to provide for me and my fam when in reality it's to make the owner of the company I work for stay rich
 
Gold is not money. You cannot walk into walmart and pull out some gold coins. I don't understand why Bernake is vilified. The guy is a hero. Bailing out the banks saved Main Street. If the banks were not bailed out the unemployment rate would be a lot higher than it is now. The fed did all that while making a net profit (according to that video).
 
It sucks that the chairman of the Fed is never elected, but chosen and retained by the president each term..Anyways, why was the gold standard abandoned in the 70s (?) ?I know Ron Paul wants to return to the standard, quoting Reagan that getting rid of the gold standard would led to irresponsible, runaway borrowing of money and credit
 
What has the public gotten in return for the bailouts though? Serious question isiahil...

The banks saved Main Street? In what way do interpret "save"? People lost homes and jobs while big corporations had parties and got bonuses. Was that a good move for the average 9-5er? I really want to wrap my mind around your logic.
 
Originally Posted by LaunchPadMcQuack

Originally Posted by Wr

dude said treasury bills aren't money either but they're assets.

truth is, we haven't dealt with money at all in our lifetimes.

all of it is government sponsored credit.

quicker people realize this, quicker people will stop ignorantly loving what they think is money.


So r u saying I basically work my %!% off at two jobs for free.....serious by the way it just irks me that I work hard to provide for me and my fam when in reality it's to make the owner of the company I work for stay rich
Not necessarily since we all participate in this economy and that participation is what gives value to what we deem as currency.  Our currency used to be backed by gold until Nixon presidency when the Bretton Woods was basically done away with.
The Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial and financial relations among the world's major industrial states in the mid 20th century. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of a fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern monetary relations among independent nation-states.

Preparing to rebuild the international economic system as World War II was still raging, 730 delegates from all 44 Allied nations gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New HampshireUnited States, for the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. The delegates deliberated upon and signed the Bretton Woods Agreements during the first three weeks of July 1944.

Setting up a system of rules, institutions, and procedures to regulate the international monetary system, the planners at Bretton Woods established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which today is part of the World Bank Group. These organizations became operational in 1945 after a sufficient number of countries had ratified the agreement.

The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained the exchange rate by tying its currency to the U.S. dollar and the ability of the IMF to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.

On August 15, 1971, the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the dollar to gold. As a result, "[t]he Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully 'fiat currency,' backed by nothing but the promise of the federal government."[sup][1][/sup] This action, referred to as the Nixon shock, created the situation in which the United States dollar became the sole backing of currencies and a reserve currency for the member states.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system




Meaning member states (countries) of the IMF International Monetary Fund

This is the only reason the us dollar has as much media coverage and power as it does. Because the real true value was taken out of the market, so that the artificial system of credit can run rampant. I still don't think most people realize that all that money on the stock market, speculation in other free markets, all the money we print doesn't exist.  We've basically been operating in a pseudo-bankrupt state for years and every president since then has basically just been managing the crisis. 
 
Originally Posted by isiahil

Gold is not money. You cannot walk into walmart and pull out some gold coins. I don't understand why Bernake is vilified. The guy is a hero. Bailing out the banks saved Main Street. If the banks were not bailed out the unemployment rate would be a lot higher than it is now. The fed did all that while making a net profit (according to that video).


The Fed bailed them out with taxpayer money and the rich got richer.
 
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him.    Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.
 
Originally Posted by whiterails

I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him.    Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.

Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
 
We have Ivy League economists having shows on Fox News...

Fox news.

And they are the same people shunning Ron Paul as a fringe presidential candidate when he has the courage to expose the Fed.

Is the Fed even an institution of our own government?
 
Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by whiterails

I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him.    Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.

Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
Posting a couple of emoticons is hardly "participating in the discussion".
If you're going to rebuke something, it's generally more effective if you post statements that support your argument instead of "
sick.gif
" and "
laugh.gif
".
 
Ben Bernanke is an extremely intelligent man. This doesn't change the fact that he has made some horrible decisions that have hamstrung America. The idea of injecting money into the economy at will and printing dollars out of thin air is a TRAGEDY.
 
Originally Posted by Maelstroom

We have Ivy League economists having shows on Fox News...

Fox news.

And they are the same people shunning Ron Paul as a fringe presidential candidate when he has the courage to expose the Fed.

Is the Fed even an institution of our own government?


Who doesn't know the answer to that question?
 
I'm not here to defend Ninjahood or anyone but it's silly to question whether someone is in "da position" to criticize. Is his voice worth less than anyone else's? And after rereading what he wrote, he hardly went out on a limb. He just posted a video and asked two questions. It's not like he pontificated on economics. He just posted a video. Sheesh.
 
Originally Posted by isiahil

Gold is not money. You cannot walk into walmart and pull out some gold coins. I don't understand why Bernake is vilified. The guy is a hero. Bailing out the banks saved Main Street. If the banks were not bailed out the unemployment rate would be a lot higher than it is now. The fed did all that while making a net profit (according to that video).

If bernake is a hero, then he is definitely not a hero for the u.s. people. He is a hero to corporate interest allowing them to continue to play the game they re all so heavily invested in. They don't care about profits. They create the money. It's about controlling the economy. You can't control an economy if you have gold valued as currency and everyday people have the potential to find more. With fiat currency, the only place you will find it is at the printer it came out of.  it's totally artificial and that's why the world is dealing with such rampant corruption, inflation, and political leverage over monopoly money. You're acting like the fed profiting is a good situation for the people when the fed was set up as a non party entity. It's not supposed to you at all as a citizen if they are profitable. They make profit by selling debt to entities buying it for more than it's worth and hoping that debt appreciates. If they are making profit off of debt, that means someone on the other end of the stick is losing lots of money too interest payments on debt so that "financial stability" can be attained. 
Don't eat everything they feed you on tv my man. 
 
Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by whiterails

I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him.    Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.

Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
this.

if ya do ya research, da reason we were taken off da gold standard was because people hoarded gold and da minute someone was gonna exchange some for money

you HAD to pay him what its worth...this made da dollar ridged and a spend crazy country like da US doesn't wanna be shackled to a fixed value in its economy

by having da dollar pegged to gold...but now since they basically print money like copy machines you see whats going on, constant raising of prices and loss of purchasing

power because da money is weak.

laugh.gif
@ ya thinking gold isn't money...there's a REASON there's millions of "we buy gold!!!" signs all over da place in your local towns, people who are in da know

are VERY EAGER of relieving you of your real wealth in precious metal and paying you back in fiat currency.
 
Originally Posted by whiterails

Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

Originally Posted by whiterails

I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him.    Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.

Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
Posting a couple of emoticons is hardly "participating in the discussion".
If you're going to rebuke something, it's generally more effective if you post statements that support your argument instead of "
sick.gif
" and "
laugh.gif
".
you sure you in the right thread?
 
Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar

What has the public gotten in return for the bailouts though? Serious question isiahil...

The banks saved Main Street? In what way do interpret "save"? People lost homes and jobs while big corporations had parties and got bonuses. Was that a good move for the average 9-5er? I really want to wrap my mind around your logic.
The public is much better off than we would have been if banks would have collapsed. I fully understand everyone being mad at the unemployment rate, but if big banks collapsed the unemployment rate would be much higher. So yes of course people lost their jobs, that was the worst recession since the great depression. But due to Bernake's actions alot less people lost their jobs than what would have happened if he didnt bailout the banks. The CEOs of most of the big banks they got bailed out were fired.  Also no big banks issued bonuses when they received their bailout money. They started back giving bonus AFTER they paid back the bailout money and business picked back up. But that is irrelevant, we (the American economy) need banks to function or it is curtains for everyone. So while I understand the it is frustrating being unemployed these days and watching bankers make millions, we would be worst off if we let banks collapse.
 
Back
Top Bottom