- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,226
hmmm....this who ya got runnin da fed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Wr
dude said treasury bills aren't money either but they're assets.
truth is, we haven't dealt with money at all in our lifetimes.
all of it is government sponsored credit.
quicker people realize this, quicker people will stop ignorantly loving what they think is money.
Originally Posted by swizzc
gold isn't money
Not necessarily since we all participate in this economy and that participation is what gives value to what we deem as currency. Our currency used to be backed by gold until Nixon presidency when the Bretton Woods was basically done away with.Originally Posted by LaunchPadMcQuack
Originally Posted by Wr
dude said treasury bills aren't money either but they're assets.
truth is, we haven't dealt with money at all in our lifetimes.
all of it is government sponsored credit.
quicker people realize this, quicker people will stop ignorantly loving what they think is money.
So r u saying I basically work my %!% off at two jobs for free.....serious by the way it just irks me that I work hard to provide for me and my fam when in reality it's to make the owner of the company I work for stay rich
The Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial and financial relations among the world's major industrial states in the mid 20th century. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of a fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern monetary relations among independent nation-states.
Preparing to rebuild the international economic system as World War II was still raging, 730 delegates from all 44 Allied nations gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States, for the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. The delegates deliberated upon and signed the Bretton Woods Agreements during the first three weeks of July 1944.
Setting up a system of rules, institutions, and procedures to regulate the international monetary system, the planners at Bretton Woods established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which today is part of the World Bank Group. These organizations became operational in 1945 after a sufficient number of countries had ratified the agreement.
The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained the exchange rate by tying its currency to the U.S. dollar and the ability of the IMF to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.
On August 15, 1971, the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the dollar to gold. As a result, "[t]he Bretton Woods system officially ended and the dollar became fully 'fiat currency,' backed by nothing but the promise of the federal government."[sup][1][/sup] This action, referred to as the Nixon shock, created the situation in which the United States dollar became the sole backing of currencies and a reserve currency for the member states.
Originally Posted by isiahil
Gold is not money. You cannot walk into walmart and pull out some gold coins. I don't understand why Bernake is vilified. The guy is a hero. Bailing out the banks saved Main Street. If the banks were not bailed out the unemployment rate would be a lot higher than it is now. The fed did all that while making a net profit (according to that video).
Originally Posted by whiterails
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him. Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.
Posting a couple of emoticons is hardly "participating in the discussion".Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar
Originally Posted by whiterails
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him. Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.
Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
Originally Posted by Maelstroom
We have Ivy League economists having shows on Fox News...
Fox news.
And they are the same people shunning Ron Paul as a fringe presidential candidate when he has the courage to expose the Fed.
Is the Fed even an institution of our own government?
Originally Posted by isiahil
Gold is not money. You cannot walk into walmart and pull out some gold coins. I don't understand why Bernake is vilified. The guy is a hero. Bailing out the banks saved Main Street. If the banks were not bailed out the unemployment rate would be a lot higher than it is now. The fed did all that while making a net profit (according to that video).
this.Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar
Originally Posted by whiterails
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him. Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.
Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
you sure you in the right thread?Originally Posted by whiterails
Posting a couple of emoticons is hardly "participating in the discussion".Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar
Originally Posted by whiterails
I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that Ben Benanke is more intelligent and better versed in economics then you, OP.
You're hardly in da position to criticize him. Any fault that you see in his statement is due to your ignorance, not his.
Really now? What makes Bernanke beyond reproach? Do you feel that way about all politicians and "officials"? Are we commoners too dumb to participate in these discussions about our decision makers? What sense does our political system make if that is the case then?
If you're going to rebuke something, it's generally more effective if you post statements that support your argument instead of "" and "
".![]()
The public is much better off than we would have been if banks would have collapsed. I fully understand everyone being mad at the unemployment rate, but if big banks collapsed the unemployment rate would be much higher. So yes of course people lost their jobs, that was the worst recession since the great depression. But due to Bernake's actions alot less people lost their jobs than what would have happened if he didnt bailout the banks. The CEOs of most of the big banks they got bailed out were fired. Also no big banks issued bonuses when they received their bailout money. They started back giving bonus AFTER they paid back the bailout money and business picked back up. But that is irrelevant, we (the American economy) need banks to function or it is curtains for everyone. So while I understand the it is frustrating being unemployed these days and watching bankers make millions, we would be worst off if we let banks collapse.Originally Posted by Brolic Scholar
What has the public gotten in return for the bailouts though? Serious question isiahil...
The banks saved Main Street? In what way do interpret "save"? People lost homes and jobs while big corporations had parties and got bonuses. Was that a good move for the average 9-5er? I really want to wrap my mind around your logic.