- 916
- 19
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
^^^^ keep dreaming you know you anit getting them..JK
Royal Foamposite 1s releasing Feb 12 2011 ((NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING! YOU WILL BE BANNED!))
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by bush man 2002,
- Start date
- 173
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2009
i would definitely get these, and the pearls. Beautiful shoes and the overall technology is frequently overlooked with this shoe. S@*t is unreal!!
- 70,049
- 24,222
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
its true though...Originally Posted by Magic1978
Where do you dudes get this crap from?
Wow, a pair of Nike's have a Swoosh on the side
here's another example.
da pros dropped just to milk that foamposite technology another season longer ( retros were not happeninng at ALL in 97 sans air force I's & air max)
- 600
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
I see everyone is bashing the foam pro now..... But i guarantee if they bring out any color foam pro now, most of u will buy them PERIOD! I myself have been wearing foams 4ever (way before the hype) and i remember when ppl 1st seen the foam one they were saying they were ugly now everyone wants them. The foam pro is CLASSIC imo! Its a dope shoe 2 me i love every color! But the foam one thing is a joke now because i kno ppl who never gave a crap bout a foamposite and are now gawking over them, and also alot of ppl are buying them to keep up with ppl and because of the price! Just my 2 cents because its to many ppl hating on the foam pro knowing they would still buy them! My account for niketalk has just been started not too long ago but i am in NO WAY a so called newbie i have been on here for years and just decided to get an account! Im not with the arguing or none of that so if your going to hate or whatever keep it moving!
- 4,991
- 454
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
THIS
- 2,390
- 413
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
Ones > Pros. Any Day. The Only Pro That I Could Say Is Worth Sayin Ones < Pro Is The Pearls. That Colorway Is Sick. But Other Than That Nahh. The Check On The Pros Kinda Throws It Off On Certain Colorways. An Some Of The Colorways They Come Out With For Them Are Jus Odd.
- 521
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
hey if u dont like the pros....to each is own
the check aint no biggie
the check aint no biggie
- 2,441
- 348
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
i gotta have royal
- 6,797
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2009
As far as the pros vs 1s, I have to go with pros. The swoosh gives them character. That was my first pair back in 02.
- 55,046
- 62,152
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Originally Posted by ninjahood
its true though...Originally Posted by Magic1978
Where do you dudes get this crap from?
Wow, a pair of Nike's have a Swoosh on the side
here's another example.
da pros dropped just to milk that foamposite technology another season longer ( retros were not happeninng at ALL in 97 sans air force I's & air max)
What? This is an example of what?
Since you 're so in tune about what Nike is doing, can you tell me when the Royal Ones are coming out? Didn't think so. Sometimes I really think you get confused between what opinion and a fact is.
- 167
- 10
- Joined
- May 9, 2005
IM ON IT!!!!
- 70,049
- 24,222
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
umm...did you even get da point of what i was saying?Originally Posted by Magic1978
Originally Posted by ninjahood
its true though...Originally Posted by Magic1978
Where do you dudes get this crap from?
Wow, a pair of Nike's have a Swoosh on the side
here's another example.
da pros dropped just to milk that foamposite technology another season longer ( retros were not happeninng at ALL in 97 sans air force I's & air max)
What? This is an example of what?
Since you 're so in tune about what Nike is doing, can you tell me when the Royal Ones are coming out? Didn't think so. Sometimes I really think you get confused between what opinion and a fact is.
foamposite pros were JUST another way for nike to milk that sneaker for another year...a recycle.
i never cared about pros, never bought a pair other then da pippen pearls from 2002 and thats it....
foamposite pros will always play second fiddle to da penny foamposite I's.
- 55,046
- 62,152
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
I got what you were saying, it was just stupid. I swear I don't think you actually think about the stuff you type.
So going by your logic the Air Max 90, 93, 95, 97....2010 is just Nike milking Air Technology?
If you don't like them, just say you don't like them, don't apply idiotic logic to it, because sometimes I get confused if I'm reading your rants or Will's.
So going by your logic the Air Max 90, 93, 95, 97....2010 is just Nike milking Air Technology?
If you don't like them, just say you don't like them, don't apply idiotic logic to it, because sometimes I get confused if I'm reading your rants or Will's.
og_Rodney
formerly airodney23
- 2,553
- 339
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2004
If people hate Foam Pros so much, why the HELL is it so damn hard for me to find a pair of the Silver Pros?
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
Nothing wrong with the foam pros, but we're comparing the royal pro's to the royal 1's.
Are these even coming out? lol
Are these even coming out? lol
- 1,143
- 105
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
AiRodney23 wrote:
If people hate Foam Pros so much, why the HELL is it so damn hard for me to find a pair of the Silver Pros?
baby jumpman
Staff member
- 5,377
- 495
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
william rivera 3
Banned
- 2,479
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
Damn, even the magically year of 1978 acknowledges his niketalk og. Gotta love when niketalk dedicates time and effort to a single entity, like its the thing to do. I have a fact for y'all, this website is full of opinions. Keep learning. Royal pros are nice like my pair...swooshless.
- 149
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2001
Hey William you have the same avatar that vampedo/pedopire/pedofile Mr. Niketalk has. You should change it asap, people might confuse you w/ that pathetic loser.
saved this gem from that Localhoopupz thread about him tryin to pick up a 14 yr old girl.
- 43
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
for real?
- 28,097
- 2,607
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
- 7,072
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
pretty much
- 2,156
- 12
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
i see silver pro's on ebay all the time for less than 200
- 21,590
- 10,204
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
You understand what he is saying why do people hate so hard for no reason. The Pros and the Foam 1s are the same shoe except for a check and clear soles and penny logo. The air max 90 looks nothing like the air max 97.
And his logic is if you look at the Nike Shox VC III its a very sleek nice shoe. Then nike release the Nike Shox Bomber (i think that's what that is) and its pretty much a VC III with a nike check on it and some blotchy color patches. It's nike releasing the same shoe with some changes. Just like the foams and foam pros.
At least by me when OG Foam Pros released they sat. No one wanted a knock off foamposite 1. They were like owning Jordan Jumpman Pros when everyone else was wearing the 12s in 96.
- 55,046
- 62,152
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Why exactly are you involved in this?
First of all look at my original comment, and his reply to me. His reply to me had absolutely nothing to do with what I said.
Are you new to this board? Ninja comes off as the board know it all, and I'm still trying to figure out who he's trying to impress? A bunch of dudes? It's only a couple of levels down from Will. The amusing thing is he can't admit when he's wrong or he just tries to apply some sort of dumb logic to out talk you.
And those Shox look nothing alike, and neither do the Barkley's and those Strongs. They just have the same sole. That's why I used the Air analogy. I have those Shox Bombers and when I got them I didn't think, hey without the Swoosh these look like the Vinces. I guess if you removed the swoosh those kicks were supposed to look alike, so fail.
Play your position kid, he's a grown man, he can speak for himself.