You are proving my point that you have no real interest in real evidence or good faith.
I do, you are not making an argument. you haven't presented anying that is countering what I've said about rudy this entire playoffs.
"He's a flawed player but Wolves are generally better with him then without"
again this has been true for most of the games in the playoffs.
you desperately want to create this straw man that i've said "Gobert is the best defender in the world, Gobert is perfect, Gobert has no flaws"
unfortunately I've never said that, so you're scrambling desperately to make stuff up.
--
I work in marketing, I given you the industry standard practice, I've shown you that companies with way more information than you or I, and way more money on the line,
they all try to speak to customers in their languages, get stars to reach out to people in their languages, have their stars make media appearances. this is STANDARD PRACTICE.
because you don't have a response to this obvious reality you raise the standard of evidence to an absurd level.
unless I show you some kind of mathematical equation that shows exactly how much more popular Ohtani would be if he spoke english
we couldn't possible deductively reason about the value of speaking english in an english country.