Originally Posted by
eiddyfouw
Originally Posted by DaBottom305
I know this argument won't go anywhere but serious question. Do you guys believe someone (not necessarily Lebron) needs as much if not more rings to be better than MJ?
btw the previous statement was just trolling.
The thing is this. You need the rings, and you need to impact the basketball as a whole.
Jordan doesn't have the most rings...but his impact on the game was insane. As I type this he has grown men shooting their socks into a laundry basket sayin "JORDAAAN!"
It will take that physical impact in the actual game, and to basketball as a whole, before he can be seen as better than Jordan.
But first he'll have to get past