- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
Maybe explain your stance on why you think it is acceptable for men to wear women's clothing.
But is getting bums the end all be all?
What's wrong with men wearing Ugg Classics?
But is getting bums the end all be all?
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
Maybe explain your stance on why you think it is acceptable for men to wear women's clothing.
But is getting bums the end all be all?
- May 1, 2006
- 6,396
- 16
- May 1, 2006
- 6,396
- 16
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
Uggs aren't Women's clothing though ...
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
Uggs aren't Women's clothing though ...
- Sep 2, 2010
- 549
- 10
I'm glad I ain't the only one who thinks like this.
- Sep 2, 2010
- 549
- 10
I'm glad I ain't the only one who thinks like this.
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
Bittersweet you honestly don't believe Uggs are an article of clothing that targets female wearmanship?
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
Bittersweet you honestly don't believe Uggs are an article of clothing that targets female wearmanship?
- Aug 11, 2001
- 5,804
- 3,105
Originally Posted by ninjahood
Originally Posted by AirForce1King
And ya'll know if Kanye made a song called "Me In My Uggs" then Jay Z was spotted rocking a pair that ya'll would buy these things like hot cakes...
they couldn't even bring back timberlands when they were rockin em back last year.
How about if Wayne statr doing it? You mean to tell me bammas wouldn't jump on them with the quickness? Remember this:
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
- Aug 11, 2001
- 5,804
- 3,105
Originally Posted by ninjahood
Originally Posted by AirForce1King
And ya'll know if Kanye made a song called "Me In My Uggs" then Jay Z was spotted rocking a pair that ya'll would buy these things like hot cakes...
they couldn't even bring back timberlands when they were rockin em back last year.
How about if Wayne statr doing it? You mean to tell me bammas wouldn't jump on them with the quickness? Remember this:
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
Nope. That's just what our American view has us thinking.
Please look up the origin of UGGS.
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
Nope. That's just what our American view has us thinking.
Please look up the origin of UGGS.
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
I understand what you are trying to say. But we live in America and Uggs are women's clothing in America. There is no mistaking that. But I guess your point here is men shouldn't be afraid to express themselves even if it crosses the imaginary lines of gender exclusivity?
But my question is where do you stop? If there is a new fad that has American men wearing short skirts would you refer to Scotland males wearing kilts as a justification? I just want to know if there is a such thing as too far for you.
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
I understand what you are trying to say. But we live in America and Uggs are women's clothing in America. There is no mistaking that. But I guess your point here is men shouldn't be afraid to express themselves even if it crosses the imaginary lines of gender exclusivity?
But my question is where do you stop? If there is a new fad that has American men wearing short skirts would you refer to Scotland males wearing kilts as a justification? I just want to know if there is a such thing as too far for you.
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
I'm just saying that Uggs were originally made for men (specifically Aviators in WW1) ... only recently did it become a "woman" thing I suppose.
Skirts ... manbags ... ok. But we're talking about warm boots here.
- Sep 20, 2008
- 3,160
- 10
I'm just saying that Uggs were originally made for men (specifically Aviators in WW1) ... only recently did it become a "woman" thing I suppose.
Skirts ... manbags ... ok. But we're talking about warm boots here.
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
But does it not matter the usage current state of a product? If we are only going to use items for what they were originally made for them we can make the statement that black women perm their hair to be like white women. I mean since that was the ORIGINAL usage of relaxers.
My point is just because something HAD a certain usage doesn't mean it is justified to use it for that reason long after that original reason has been dead.
So you can honestly tell us that in 2010, Uggs are NOT a female's piece of clothing in the USA? And you are subscribing to the idea that it is fine for a MAN to wear this product?
Again I ask, where do you draw the line?
My point is just because something HAD a certain usage doesn't mean it is justified to use it for that reason long after that original reason has been dead.
So you can honestly tell us that in 2010, Uggs are NOT a female's piece of clothing in the USA? And you are subscribing to the idea that it is fine for a MAN to wear this product?
Again I ask, where do you draw the line?
- Oct 13, 2001
- 176,359
- 164,828
But does it not matter the usage current state of a product? If we are only going to use items for what they were originally made for them we can make the statement that black women perm their hair to be like white women. I mean since that was the ORIGINAL usage of relaxers.
My point is just because something HAD a certain usage doesn't mean it is justified to use it for that reason long after that original reason has been dead.
So you can honestly tell us that in 2010, Uggs are NOT a female's piece of clothing in the USA? And you are subscribing to the idea that it is fine for a MAN to wear this product?
Again I ask, where do you draw the line?
My point is just because something HAD a certain usage doesn't mean it is justified to use it for that reason long after that original reason has been dead.
So you can honestly tell us that in 2010, Uggs are NOT a female's piece of clothing in the USA? And you are subscribing to the idea that it is fine for a MAN to wear this product?
Again I ask, where do you draw the line?
- Nov 18, 2007
- 4,203
- 11
Okay they were made for men but they do not look good on them.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,047
- 24,226
moral of da story....just say no to men in classic uggs....
- Nov 18, 2007
- 4,203
- 11
Okay they were made for men but they do not look good on them.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,047
- 24,226
moral of da story....just say no to men in classic uggs....
- Aug 15, 2008
- 3,624
- 12
gay
gay gay
gay
gay gay
gay
