Who killed Kennedy?

Joined Aug 8, 2007
I wasn't even alive when it happened, and the question be having my mind racing every now and then. Who did it?
The mobb?


Combination of all three?

This case is so appealing to me to this day for several reasons. How on earth did they just play everyone with that Warren commission "single-bullet" theory. Also Oswald getting offed, and the dallas investigation in general is 
. I know it is NT knowledge that it was a coverup, but I want to delve further into what NT think happened. As I do know a bit on the subject, but I am eager to hear what some of you with educated opinions think.

Joined Apr 24, 2008
His wife

On the 22nd November, 1963, the United States President, John F. Kennedy, was murdered in Dallas, Texas. The method of assassination was a single gunshot tothe head. Someone travelling in Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson's car, immediately behind the president's limousine, was filming thewhole thing (as the following still demonstrates)!

(Click the image to view the video.)

Lyndon 'Lyin' Johnson, as he was called, was a Zionist Jew and became the unelected President of the United States at the instant of the realPresident's death. He then made it his top priority to instantly reverse several programmes instigated by President Kennedy; these Kennedy initiativeswould have been to the benefit of the American people and the betterment of mankind in general, but were contrary to the interests of Zionism.

Another Jew, Abraham Zapruder, was standing in exactly the right place to capture the murder of President Kennedy on cine film. The Zapruder familysubsequently made a fortune selling the rights to this piece of film to the American government.

It is interesting to note that the route of the presidential cavalcade was changed at the last minute to bring JFK along this particular road, so why wasZapruder already set up with his cine camera at this precise spot?
[h3]The Zapruder film[/h3]
Using a Bell and Howell 414PD 8mm roll-film movie camera, Zapruder caught the assassination from the side of the limousine closest to thepresident. The owner's manual for this model of cine camera quoted the film speed as 16 frames per second (fps). However, the FBI claimed thatZapruder's camera was running at 18.3 fps in their tests, seemingly confirmed by the camera manufacturers, Bell and Howell (whose independent testsproduced a speed of slightly over 18 fps). (Roland Zavada).

Several copies (at least 4) of the film were made by Zapruder, of which one was taken by the FBI.

The film was not seen by the public until twelve years after it was taken, when it was aired on a late-night talk show in America. Today it appears in manyplaces and forms on the Internet (YouTube, for example), and is used here as the basis of the photographic evidence examined.
[h3]From which direction was JFK shot in the head?[/h3]
Zapruder frame 313 captures the instant of JFK's assassination. Analysis of subsequent frames, such as 326 (below), show no sign of any blood, braintissue or skull fragments on the back seat of the presidential limousine, nor on its boot. From this we deduce that JFK was not shot from the back. Also, ifthe bullet passed right through his head, as seems almost certain, then, by this lack of morbid debris, he could not have been shot from the fronteither.

This leaves only three possible directions: from the left side, the right side, or upwards through his head.
[h3]Exiting projectiles[/h3]
Viewing Zapruder's film at normal speed, something flies out upwards and to the right from President Kennedy's head when he receives the fatal shot.In frames 313 and 314, two distinct projectiles, slightly separated but travelling in the same direction, can clearly be seen. Both of these ejections haveflown out of the camera's field of view by the time that frame 315 is captured.

The leading projectile, number 1, has travelled (235 - 34) - (146 - 38) pixels in the +ve x-direction and (415 - 110) - (408 - 297) pixels in the +vey-direction, in the time between these two frames being captured (0.0625s at 16 fps, or 0.0546s at 18.3 fps). I.e., its speed is between 3,442.24 and 3,940.29pixels per second.

President Kennedy was 6'1" tall (Wallechinsky & Wallace).Using the full-length photo of JFK in Berlin (Freie Universitaet, 26th June, 1963), and having calculated the line AB in frame 313 to be 30.23 pixels, it canbe shown that the projectile material was leaving the top of President Kennedy's head at a minimum* speed of between 31.6 and 36.2 metres per second(equivalent to between 104 and 119 ft/s).

* This is a minimum value because frames 313 and 314 are two-dimensional images providing no depth information.
Frames 312 to 317, inclusive, of the Zapruder film are reproduced here, having been contrast-enhanced and converted to greyscale images, in order tohighlight a definite puff of smoke right next to the left side of the President's head.

The smoke rapidly expands and dissipates in about 3 tenths of a second (0.2732s at 18.3 fps and 0.3125s at 16 fps), being just discernable in the last frameof this sequence.

Material from the head wound has exited at high speed, as we have observed, and would not wispily linger in the air as smoke does. Moreover, it is evidentthat this smoke has an initial component of velocity in the horizontal direction equal to that of the limousine and that this component is slowed by airresistance (compare the expanding smoke cloud with the white object on the lawn and with the fixed features of the president's car, such as the top of therear seat). The separation between the smoke cloud and the white object on the grass decreases at a rate that is very slightly less than the rate at which thewhite object is perceived to travel with respect to the limousine.

Neither John nor Jackie Kennedy are smoking a cigarette. The smoke has been caused by some explosive reaction, such as the detonation of a firearmcartridge. Such smoke remains where the gun is; it does not travel with the bullet. The fact that this smoke appears in the sequence at the same time as thefatal injury, and that it emanates from the left-hand-side of JFK's head, where Jackie Kennedy has positioned herself, means that President Kennedy waskilled by his wife.

I am not the first to reach this conclusion. This view is shared by someone calling themselves 'Nohup' who, in a public forum on 3rd April 2008, wrote "After studyingthe Zapruder film for nearly 20 years, I've come to the conclusion that the only person verified to have the access and angle to have delivered the fatalgunshot to JFK was Jackie Kennedy. The telltale sign is right before his head explodes, where she moves forward with something in her hand."

That JFK was shot at point blank range from the lower left side of his head is also supported by the amount and distribution of blood on JFK's shirt, asphotographed from the back,

And from the front,

The so-called bullet hole is no such thing; it seems to have been hastily made by snipping along three sides with scissors and then tearing the resultingflap of material off. Notice, for instance, how the rightmost snip extends a little way past the start of the topmost snip which, in turn, extends slightlypast the top of the leftmost snip:

There is no doubt, if one studies the Zapruder film running at normal speed, that Mrs. Kennedy seems to whip something quickly away after her husband isshot, before she clambers out onto the boot. (Johnson had the whole of the presidential limousine immediately ripped out and shredded, before having the carre-fitted and using it for himself.)

In the next animated gif, produced by the author in October 2009 and uploaded on 13th October 2009, Jacqueline Kennedy's actions at the instant of herhusband's fatal gunshot wound are very clearly seen ...
[h3]Jackie Kennedy[/h3]
Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy (née Bouvier) was a #$++#!, a fact well hidden, but revealed by her cousin/step-brother, Gore Vidal, in his autobiography:

"... the ethnic surprise buried deep inside Gore Vidal's much-hyped autobiography, ... 'Palimpsest: A Memoir,' ... [is that JackieKennedy's] mother, Janet, was Jewish. Janet, who had Jackie with her husband John 'Black Jack' Bouvier, eventually divorced him and married HughAuchincloss, who was also Vidal's stepfather.

"In the book, ... Vidal offhandedly writes on page 372, 'One should note that the first of Hughdie's (Hugh Dudley Auchincloss) threehigh-powered wives was Russian, the second my mother, the third Jackie's mother, Janet, born Lee or, as my mother used to observe thoughtfully, Levy.'Vidal continues, 'Apparently, Janet's father had changed his name in order to become the first Jew to be a vice president of the Morgan bank. My motherwondered how Hughdie, a quiet but sincere anti-Semite, would respond when he found out.' As for Janet Lee, he writes she used to say she was 'of theVirginia Lees'...until the real Lees ordered her to shut up.'..." (AhmedRami quoting from the New York Post of 9th November, 1995.)

Peter Kurth during his very brief review of Christopher Andersen'sbook, "Jackie After Jack," writes: "America's grieving first widow, during those terrible Four Days in November, was chain-smoking Salemsand shot up on speed. She was also entertaining everyone in earshot with the grisly details of Kennedy's death, compelled ... to describe the way his headblew off in her lap, how she tried to stick the skull back on in the hope it would keep him alive, how Texas Gov. John Connally was 'squealing like a stuckpig,' etc. (For the record, she did not remember trying to crawl out of the car.)"
[h3]The weapon[/h3]
According to his long-term mistress, who bore him a son, Johnson was sure the day before this atrocity took place that President J.F. Kennedy was going tobe killed whilst being driven through Dallas. This implies that he knew there would be no untoward problem with the assassin, since she would be right next toher victim. However, a sophisticated weapon, such as a Smith & Wesson semi-automatic handgun, could quite possibly jam at the predetermined moment,spoiling Johnson's (and his backers, including Aristotle Onassis) murderous plan. At such close range, however, a simple, crude pistol would be all thatwas required.

Something like this Deringer (more often spelt with a double 'r') would thus have beenchosen; an extremely simple, easily concealed, one shot, miniture cannon.

"The .41 rimfire cartridge was created for use in small Derringer type pistols. The .41 rimfire round was very slow, 13 grains of black powderpropelling a 130 grain lead bullet at 425 feet per second, yielding a muzzle energy of 52 ft lb." (Cushman). This would be more than capable of taking part of President Kennedy's skull off, as Mrs. Kennedy implies.

If the leading projectile captured in frames 313 and 314 of Zapruder's cine film was indeed the bullet from a .41 calibre rimfire cartridge, then itsanalysed speed of at least 104-119 ft/s is commensurate with an accelerated lump of lead that has lost kinetic energy during its passage through human tissue,and in particular in breaking through the top of the skull.

Just such a single shot, .41 calibre pistol was used to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, again at point-blank range, again by his wife, andagain with the blame attached to some patsie. How Zionists seem to revel in this sort of obscene deception and repetition.

Look again at frame 326, above. Does this small-barrelled pistol not remarkably resemble what Jacqueline Kennedy seems to be holding in her right hand?
Obviously Jacqueline Kennedy could not just produce a gun and shoot her husband from point blank range in broad daylight, at least not with any degree ofcertainty. Who knows where he would be looking at the designated time and place, and the type of weapon identified here only has one bullet in the chamber.

Solution? He had to be incapacitated in a way that was sure and precise, such that he was unable to react.

When viewing the Zapruder film it is easily seen that John Kennedy is smiling and waving to people along the roadside as his limousine starts to be obscuredby the street sign, but is suffering pain and discomfort of the upper respiratory tract as he comes back into view at the rightmost edge of the sign.

Whatever effect has caused this change has happened between frames 206 and 221, inclusive, and by frame 230 (below) the President is in cleardistress.

This problem very rapidly takes hold, as captured in frames 237:



and 246:

And he becomes completely incapacitated by frame 254:

We can work out the minimum and maximum time involved from these observations. The minimum time is obtained by assuming (254 - 221) frames at 18.3 fps andthe maximum time by assuming (254 - 206) frames at 16 fps. Hence, from the onset of pain until incapacitation must have taken from 1.8 to 3.0 seconds. This isvery rapid. It is also not caused by a bullet wound, as the official storyline goes, because there is no blood, no violent lurching of the body, no concern onMrs. Kennedy's face, no concern on Connally's face (when he turns around) and no attempt by John Kennedy to dive for cover or to protect his wife.

Mrs. Kennedy keeps her full attention on Governor Connally from frame 255, when he starts to look behind, up to and including frame 291, when he looks away.This corresponds to a time span of between 2.0 and 2.3 seconds. Not long, but long enough for Connally to ascertain that JFK is fully incapacitated and to givethe signal to Jacqueline Kennedy.

For example, frame 262:

and frame 274:

In frame 274, above, she definitely seems to be waiting for the okay from Connally.

She then begins her preparations to murder her husband from frame 292. Here is frame 294:

Note in particular that up until this point Jacqueline Kennedy had kept as much distance as possible from her clearly distressed husband, keeping him at baywith her gloved hands.

The point where President Kennedy was to be sacrificed had been marked out. The big, black man in the foreground, seen in several of the above frames,positioned to the right of the sign, with his right arm extended was probably the marker for the car to slow down almost to a standstill (a cine film takenfrom the other side of the car distinctly shows how slow the car was going from the sign to the murder spot), someone then disabled the victim via a remote,electronic trigger, Connally examined the extent of incapacity and then Jacqueline Kennedy, once given the nod by Connally, immediately placed the gun in thepredetermined position and discharged the chamber through her husband's head. All of it to be captured on Abraham Zapruder's film for later gleefulgloating, with other films being taken to be sure of having a record of this extreme baseness from every possible angle. (In fact, Zapruder almost did misalignhis camera, getting the car right down at the bottom edge of the emulsion for a while.)

As for who had the electronic trigger, a strong possibility is that it was the passenger next to the driver of President Kennedy's limousine, since hehad a view of the human marker in front of him and of President Kennedy, by way of the door mirror, behind him. The transmitter would be wired into thepassenger door and would have been powered by the car's battery for very high signal strength.

Then the cavalcade speeds up and takes the victim straight to the "hospital," where John Kennedy could be pronounced dead (after keeping theAmerican people in hope and suspense for some predetermined length of time).

So, how could they incapacitate the president? The answer lies with Connally.
[h3]Nerve agents[/h3]
President Kennedy's reaction is not that of a victim of a gunshot or an electric shock, but that of someone who has been exposed to a lachrymatory agent(or lachrymator). These cause difficulty in breathing, paralysis and general respiratory discomfort. Even relatively mild ones can be very fast acting:"Tear gas is so fast-acting it's amazing. It affects your throat more than it affects your eyes, in fact. I honestly felt like if I didn't drinksomething my throat was literally going to fall out of my body." (Source.)

There were many chemical and/or biological agents known to research laboratories and the military, even back in 1963. These are classified in variouscategories, three of which are the harassing agents (such as CN and CS gas),blister agents (such as mustard gas) and nerve agents (such as sarin - discovered in 1939 - and tabun).

They are all incapacitating in nature and their characteristics depend upon the type of agent, the concentration and the method of dissemination."Usefulness," in the military sense of the word, depends upon the time taken to have the desired effect, the predictability of behaviour and theantidotes available for friendly personnel.

There is insufficient information available to the public to be able to identify which agent was used to incapacitate John F. Kennedy, but we can narrow thefield down a little.

Blister vesicants, such as mustard gas, burn the skin and respiratory tract, but can be ruled out because their effects do not manifest themselves untillong after exposure.

Harassing gases or sprays can be eliminated, since they would be highly likely to incapacitate Jacqueline Kennedy as well, and would not render the victimtotally incapable or unaware.

An agent which is liquid in its normal state, highly incapacitating, very rapid in taking effect, safe to handle (constituents being kept apart) and forwhich antidotes are available, would be needed.

A nerve agent developed by the British at Porton Down Chemical Weapons Research Centre between 1952 and 1954, subsequently called VX gas after its production technology was traded with the Americans in return for nuclearweapons secrets, or one of the variants thereof, is a distinct possibility. Although called a gas, it is actually a clear, odourless liquid at roomtemperature.

A stronger candidate though is cyclosarin, cyclohexyl methylphosphonofluoridate(or GF). This is a colourless and odourless liquid at room temperature in its pure form, which is highly persistent (i.e., gives off almost no vapour) and ishighly toxic when absorbed through the skin. It was initially developed by Germany in the Second World War (not used by them) and then further studied anddeveloped by both Britain and the United States in the early 1950s.

It was necessary to get the liquid nerve agent onto JFK's skin and to facilitate this the murderers made use of the fact that President Kennedy had along-term back problem and always wore a steel-boned brace. The following two sets of photos purport to show this contraption after it had been taken off hisbody. They cannot be showing the original, of course, since there is no blood on the material. It is more likely that they are photos of one of JFK'sbona fide back supports (probably off Air Force One). Special precautions would have been necessary to remove and dispose of the one he was actuallywearing.

The agent would be stored in the girdle as two precursors, separated until required to be combined. To quote Wikipedia, "A cyclosarin binary weapon would most likely contain methylphosphonyl difluoridein one capsule, with the other capsule containing either cyclohexanol or a mixture of cyclohexylamine and cyclohexanol."

Two small vials of the chemical precursors would have been stitched into the corset, together with the battery and the method of breaking the vial(s). JohnKennedy was used to having steel rods in his back support and would never have noticed any difference with this one. He was probably helped into it on theairplane.

The median lethal dose (referred to by the designation, LD50) necessary to kill a person of around 90kg would be 31.5g by percutaneous (through the skin)delivery (at 0.35mg/kg - source), and I would think it highly likely that thiswould have been roughly the quantity used, since one way or another (i.e., outside the "hospital" or inside it), President Kennedy's fate wassealed as soon as that device deposited the nerve agent onto his skin. Also, death would follow such a dose within 15 minutes, but the higher the initialdosage, the faster the incapacitation would occur and the quicker John Kennedy could be killed (by a bullet).

John Bowden Connally, Jr., a Johnson supporter and leader of the Johnson presidential campaign at the 1960 Democratic convention in Los Angeles, was namedSecretary of the United States Navy (by President Kennedy) in 1961 and directed the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean Sea. Although resigning from the navy torun for governorship of Texas, he would have been well used to (and privy to) all the nerve agent testing information that the navy had been doing, includingpersonal observation of effectiveness and reaction times on actual subjects.

The urgent need to bleach and then incinerate the actual back support cut from JFK's body, not only due to the residual nerve agent present, but also todestroy the vials and electromechanical circuitry, explains why we get photos of JFK's shirt, but not of the brace that he wore that day.

The only thing that the U.S. Navy man, John Connally, had to ensure was that JFK did indeed have the back-support brace on. How would Connally ensure thisto his satisfaction, since he had not been on the plane with the presidential party? That's easy. How would you do that if you were in his position as theGovernor of Texas? Just feel for it, using the pretext of giving the victim a friendly stroke on the back.

This animated gif was created with frames extracted from a video that is up onYouTube (these frames start at 2 minutes 41 seconds into the film).

Connally, having assurred himself that the David-ben-Gurion-ordered "wet op" (U.S. Navy parlance for a bloody assassination) to remove "anenemy of Israel" was going according to the detailed plan that he, Johnson and Aristotle Onassis had devised and rehearsed during the three months thatJacqueline Kennedy was on holiday with Aristotle Onassis (against her husband's wishes and advice, by the way), then sits in the car, waits for the signalduring the trip along the appropriate road, checks the effectiveness of the nerve agent used and, when Kennedy is displaying the symptoms that Connally wouldrecognize from navy experiments, gives the nod to Mrs. Kennedy before turning away again and waiting for the shot.

Mrs. Kennedy was wearing white gloves, to ensure no chance of touching the liquid, and had probably had a prior intravenous injection of 2mg of atropinesulfate, to cover the very small risk that she might be exposed to a tiny amount of vapour (was this the reason for pushing her husband disdainfully away andclambering out onto the boot?).

The boot-clambering incident excluded, all of this was meticulously planned to sacrificially murder a decent, naïve family man in broad daylight, justminutes after he had happily disembarked from Air Force One at Love Field Airport, Dallas.

John Kennedy was flown in, murdered within minutes and flown out, rather like a meat packaging plant operation.
How do you ensure that 'Lyin' Johnson is not shot? You do not shoot JFK from the front, because Johnson was travelling in the car behind. How do youensure that #$++#! Jacqueline Kennedy is not shot? You do not fire from either side, nor from the front or back. How do you ensure that President Kennedy iskilled? You have to shoot him in the head from very close range. When a shot is fired from a gun, where is the smoke from the gunpowder? At the place offiring.

A little later that same day, 22nd November 1963, on board Air Force One, Johnson was sworn in as U.S. President in his home state of Texas, with a composed#$++#!, Jacqueline Bouvier, faithfully by his left side and another #$++#! (Johnson's wife, Ladybug) on his right side.

Congress'man' Albert Thomas perhaps knows more than a little about this plan, as he winks at smilin' 'Lyin' Johnson. Mrs. Kennedy hasmaybe a twinge of remorse here, but Ladybug Johnson appears satisfied with the day's events (like her husband, Ladybug was a rabid Zionist).

"Congressman Johnson used legal and sometimes illegal methods to smuggle hundreds of Jews into Texas, using Galveston as the entry port. ... Johnsonsmuggled boatloads and planeloads of Jews into Texas." (Source.)

"It is interesting, but not surprising, to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel's intelligenceservice agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned. And yet a Mossad motive is obvious. On this question, as on almost all others, American reporters cannotbring themselves to cast Israel in an unfavourable light - despite the fact that Mossad complicity is as plausible as any of the other theories." - USRepresentative Paul Findley, March 1992.

As recorded in the Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, John F. Kennedy was completely against nuclear weapons technology fallinginto the hands of the Israelis: "Personally I am haunted by the feeling that by 1970, unless we are successful, there may be ten nuclearpowers instead of four, and by 1975, 15 to 20. ... I see the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15or 25 nations may have these weapons. I regard this as the greatest possible danger and hazard."

From an article on jewwatch.com, quote: "His [JFK's] personalcommitment is apparent in the way he dealt with the Israeli nuclear issue after he assumed office on January 20, 1961. Only ten days later, Secretary of StateDean Rusk gave the president a secret two-page memo on Israel's atomic activities, which noted the 'categoric assurances' obtained from BenGurion 'that Israel does not have plans for developing atomic weaponry.'

David ben Gurion was nothing more than a dangerous, pathological liar and terrorist. John Kennedy maybe did not see this in 1961, but was almost certainlyaware of it by mid-1963. President John F. Kennedy tried to stop Israel from starting a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. In a June 1963 letter toPrime Minister David Ben-Gurion, he insisted on proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Israel was not developing nuclear weapons at its Dimonareactor facility. Though his letter was cabled to the U.S. embassy, Ben-Gurion resigned (citing undisclosed personal reasons) before the message could bephysically delivered.

Lyndon 'Lyin' Johnson was a Zionist and hence favourable to Ezra-hell (nuclear weapons of mass destruction given to the enemies of humanity,prolonging and escalating the Vietnam war, allowing the Federal Reserve Bank scam to continue, etc.), whereas President John F. Kennedy saw the Zionist entityfor what it is and would have curbed its power and influence (no nuclear weapons allowed to the enemies of humanity, an end to the Vietnam war, abolition ofthe Federal Reserve Bank, dismantling of the CIA, etc.)

The evidence contained within Zapruder's movie points to the murderess being John Kennedy's own wife, Jacqueline, who placed a small handgun eitherunder JFK's chin or just below his left ear and fired a single, low velocity bullet straight up through his brain.

Johnson & Co. made sure that they captured this moment, by having it filmed from three different perspectives. (There are other films in existence.)

The extent to which the Zionists ensured that this heinous crime against a decent family man was caught on cine film gives some insight into their depravedand spiritually dead minds. No doubt this assassination is gleefully watched by the offspring of the Devil, behind closed doors, to this day.

Notice, for instance, a couple of similarly-dressed men, marked 'A' and 'B' (with an equipment bag, marked 'C'), who are almostcertainly CIA operatives. President Kennedy is shot in the head right before their eyes, but they do not even flinch, because they are there to document theevent, just as the Dancing Israelis were there in New York City to document the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Centre (asdiscussed elsewhere on this web site).

Where is their film?

Why were they already set up there, just like Zapruder was, along a street that President Kennedy was not scheduled to go down?

In answer to these questions and in line with the facts presented here, I contend that President John F. Kennedy, arguably the finest United Statespresident of all time, was murdered by David ben Gurion, Lyndon 'Lyin' Johnson, Aristotle Onassis, John Connally and the one who actually pulled thetrigger ... Jacqueline Kennedy, née Bouvier.
Cushman, D.A., 2008, "Single shot Pistols and Derringers," accessed 2nd September 2008.

Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1964, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., p. 280.

Rami, A., 2003, "1000 Quotes by and about Jews," numbers 301-350, accessed 1st September 2008.

Zavada, R.J., 1998, "Dissecting the Zapruder Bell & Howell 8mm Movie Camera," accessed 1st September 2008.
This research stemmed from an e-mail discussion between myself and Bernie Brauerof Canada. I am indebited to Bernie for his encouragement, opinions, support and enthusiasm.
[h3]Additional Information[/h3]
The bulk of this analysis went live on the Internet on 2nd September 2008, but I have since been stimulated into further research on this topic by some ofthe possibilities discussed on a David Icke forum that was started on 26th July 2009.

Some interesting supportive material has been collected by someone called "JR" in an article entitled, #$++#! Jacqueline Kennedy Kills JFK.

On the 8th January 2009, Bernie drew my attention to a blog on abovetopsecret.com which was started on 2nd November 2007. An extract of the initial posting is as follows (with slight corrections for spellingmistakes, etc.) ...

"I got talking to an old American guy tonight in an old London pub. He was a normal, likeable chap who seemed very honest and proud of his work; hedidn't seem like a liar and was quite humble and quiet as we chatted.

"He claimed he worked for the CIA from 1960 to '69 ... I'd say he was about 80ish.

"He quickly changed the subject [of conversation] to the JFK assassination and stated Jackie shot him with a small weapon that was hidden up hersleeve.

"He said she was an MK-ultra victim and the best way to take him out 'was in full view to dazzle the spectators, in plain view'.

"He said it was captured in the Zapruder film and was amazed it still hasn't been spotted.

"It was a kind of weird conversation; he wasn't drunk as he was drinking pints of water! Then he left ... quickly and silently without even agoodbye. I'm still kinda spooked!

"What freaks me out mostly is he was smoking a really fat cigar and the people behind the bar didn't even bat an eyelid. I tried to have acigarette with him but was promptly told to go to the garden! Almost like he owned the place, or was invisible to the new smoking laws!

Joined Nov 25, 2006
not this again. I thought there was someone else but now i really think it was Oswald. He was a former marine so it wasnt impossible for him to shoot out those three shots in that short period of time. Someone even posted the autopsy pics showing a bullet wounds in the head and upper chest/neck area.
Joined Aug 8, 2007
Originally Posted by NinerFaithful

not this again. I thought there was someone else but now i really think it was Oswald. He was a former marine so it wasnt impossible for him to shoot out those three shots in that short period of time. Someone even posted the autopsy pics showing a bullet wounds in the head and upper chest/neck area.
Ehh, actually it is impossible he fired those shots in that time span. 2.5 seconds to reload (without aiming) the two shots that hit Kennedy were less than 2 seconds apart.
@ Mrmondaynight 
 I read it all, thanks for that. Interesting to say the least.
Joined Aug 8, 2007
Originally Posted by blacklion23

This is the first time I've ever heard the wife did it.
Also this is the only theory that involves ALL of the theories 
Joined Feb 20, 2008
The theory about his wife is
. That's the best explanation I've read or heard about so far.
Joined Jun 23, 2009
Wow that was a very interesting read for sure...I read the whole thing and now for me thinking differently bout the whole JFK Case
Joined Feb 3, 2010
Originally Posted by topherr

coronal mustard with the candle stick in the dining room

[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]This post had so much potential. [/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)] [/color]
Joined Feb 17, 2006
Its Ladybird Johnson not Ladybug Johnson . There was something on tv a couple weeks about about this but they set up the shot from the rifle using the same distances
Joined Nov 28, 2009
The more that I look at the gif the more I start to believe his wife did it
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now