- 9,064
- 1,157
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
All white low II's were my first retro back in either 05/06. Loved them but beat them up to death. I would like more retros of the II's but I don't think the demand for them is there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I love 18's too. Really clean shoes to me---all colorways. Except, all mine squeak when I walk. Like the sole of the shoe is moving beneath my foot and squeaking.The 2's are the most overrated "underrated" air Jordan. I feel like the reason most people aren't on them because 1). There isn't too much footage of mike with the 2's on cause of the foot injury he sustained. 2). There aren't but about 3-4 OG colorways of the shoe. I like 2's a lot but being the middle child between air Jordan 1 and the air Jordan 3 is gonna get you unnoticed regardless if you were being made in Italy. I have a feeling that the 2's will retro next year with the OG wings box and maybe some made in Italy hype attached to it. Lows should be appreciated too. But the white/black/red colorway and the retro black/chrome colorway is a must for next Year. But if you wanna talk about underrated lets talk about XVIII's fellas.....assuming you guys know what they look like................................
damn, that is turrible. I hate comparing '96 and '01 Jordan 11's to the 11's nowadays too. Straight disappointment; but I gots to have my 11's even still.^
you got that right!
here's a pic i took of my 2's (08 next to 95) - it shows the toebox issue you speak of
the cdp toebox goes up at almost a 90 degree angle while the 95 is more of a 45 degree angle (like it should be)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the "2" the first shoe Jordan dunked from the free throw line in? And then did it again the next year in the "3's"?^
dude, the 95 retro 2 high may be the most comfortable pair of nike air's i've ever worn (didn't have da ogs)
i've said it before - like walking on pillows
(yet the 08 cdp high was the most uncomfortable pair i've ever had)
that's why i think a retro 2 high deserves/requires top notch materials, which sadly would mean limited
but i'd rather that senario that another crappy release, ya know?
the original 2 was marketed as a luxury sneaker more than a performance shoe, therefore i think it is the perfect
model for nike to re-release with quality - and being tied into the dunk contest - shoot - this model is perfect for
a high quality make-over with all original branding (that means na on da bottom too!)
definitely agreed. wish i could have had a shot at a pair.The BIN 23 II is a fantastic shoe. IMO it is the best of the series.
Same here but I had the white/navy pair. No hate here, but the mids have always reminded me of moon boots for some reason lol.All white low II's were my first retro back in either 05/06. Loved them but beat them up to death. I would like more retros of the II's but I don't think the demand for them is there.
^
you got that right!
here's a pic i took of my 2's (08 next to 95) - it shows the toebox issue you speak of
View media item 394683
the cdp toebox goes up at almost a 90 degree angle while the 95 is more of a 45 degree angle (like it should be)
The 2's are the most overrated "underrated" air Jordan. I feel like the reason most people aren't on them because 1). There isn't too much footage of mike with the 2's on cause of the foot injury he sustained. 2). There aren't but about 3-4 OG colorways of the shoe. I like 2's a lot but being the middle child between air Jordan 1 and the air Jordan 3 is gonna get you unnoticed regardless if you were being made in Italy. I have a feeling that the 2's will retro next year with the OG wings box and maybe some made in Italy hype attached to it. Lows should be appreciated too. But the white/black/red colorway and the retro black/chrome colorway is a must for next Year. But if you wanna talk about underrated lets talk about XVIII's fellas.....assuming you guys know what they look like................................
This has been a problem with present day retros in general. Look at the Air Tech Challenge II retro. Nike needs to move their production back to Taiwan. The boxy curved up toebox is not a good look.
2s are bland.
Watch them put a $160 price tag on em.
They were just 4 AJs in the 80s.Love em, love all the 80s Jordans to be honest
^
dude, the 95 retro 2 high may be the most comfortable pair of nike air's i've ever worn (didn't have da ogs)
i've said it before - like walking on pillows
(yet the 08 cdp high was the most uncomfortable pair i've ever had)
that's why i think a retro 2 high deserves/requires top notch materials, which sadly would mean limited
but i'd rather that senario that another crappy release, ya know?
the original 2 was marketed as a luxury sneaker more than a performance shoe, therefore i think it is the perfect
model for nike to re-release with quality - and being tied into the dunk contest - shoot - this model is perfect for
a high quality make-over with all original branding (that means na on da bottom too!)
^
you got that right!
here's a pic i took of my 2's (08 next to 95) - it shows the toebox issue you speak of
View media item 394683
the cdp toebox goes up at almost a 90 degree angle while the 95 is more of a 45 degree angle (like it should be)
This has been a problem with present day retros in general. Look at the Air Tech Challenge II retro. Nike needs to move their production back to Taiwan. The boxy curved up toebox is not a good look.
I want black/chrome to drop, I've always wanted a pair.