Zoom 95 Retro Review, White/Carbon Fiber/black/silver

15
10
Joined
Oct 27, 2000
Just finished playing in these last Friday at the gym. First of all, I used them to play volleyball in. Since vball and bball involve the same movements, itshould apply the same to hoops.

First thing you'll notice is the head turning and neck breaking these cause. A lot of non sneaker heads will be caught looking at your shoes. They lookthat unique.

Fresh out the box. size 10.5 mens. It's a very stiff shoe when you first wear them. I mean very stiff (viagra level). You need to give these plenty of timeto break in. Remember that they're called 95's for a reason. Thats 12 years worth of technology that has changed. If you wear low socks or no showsocks, expect the uppers to rub against your ankles. I wore calf high socks, 2 pairs for comfort.

The lacing system could be improved. It doesn't really wrap your foot securely as most of today's shoes because it doesn't have a hole at the verytop. The laces stay tied however and don't come loose. I have trouble with the ZK1 laces doing this a lot.

Grip: nothing to complain about. The court I played on was well maintained and not dusty. Not a lot of sliding around. I didn't need to wet the bottom ofmy soles to increase grip.

Cushioning: Again, these were fresh out the box, so it will take time to break in. Not the pillowy soft effect you find in other more modern day Zoom shoes,like the ZK1 or Lebrons. The shoes did a fine job for me and you can feel safe playing in them long term.

Ankle Support: Not a high cut shoe, and those wearing low ankle socks will feel the shoes rubbing a lot. I switched to calf high socks to prevent this.

Sizing: True to size. No need to move up or down a half size. I wear 10.5 in other nikes and this is what I bought for the Zoom 95s. But everyone's feet isdifferent, so judge for yourself.

Creasing: No noticeable creasing after first wear. I played about 2.5 hours of Vball in them and they looked brand new after taking them off. Unlike bball, youdon't have people stepping on your shoes accidentally in volleyball. But again, these are shoes to ball in, so who cares if they crease!

Weight: very light weight shoe. Although is seems like a very bulky shoe because of the pods and the wide lower portion of the sole, its not heavy at all.Nothing to complain about.

Cooling: There are hidden nets in the tongue to help with heat dissipation.

Out of a 10, I'd give them 8 on performance, 10 on looks. Hope this helps! Any questions, feel free to ask.
 
These'll take at least 3 wearings to break in. The shoe is THAT stiff. But...once broken in the Zoom feels fairly responsive.

My beef with these has always been how wide based they are for a guard's shoe. They're not very sleek whatsoever.

Either way...they look AMAZING.
eek.gif
 
they're fine if you move laterally. In volleyball you find yourself shuffling your feet a lot from left to right or reverse. Like Billy said, they arestiff. Before I wore them to ball in, I wore them in the house but that still doesn't help. You'll have to put some real work into these babies to getthem to conform to your feet.
 
It was so stiff to the point that it was hurting my ankle whenever I was walking around the house.
Traction is decent, I've had better.

Overall, it's not the best hooping shoe out there.
But probably one of the most stylish.
 
Originally Posted by B1LLY HOYLE

These'll take at least 3 wearings to break in. The shoe is THAT stiff. But...once broken in the Zoom feels fairly responsive.

My beef with these has always been how wide based they are for a guard's shoe. They're not very sleek whatsoever.

Either way...they look AMAZING.
eek.gif

that's what i love about them.

i got me some wide-
censoredvv6.gif
duck feet.
laugh.gif



they fit nicely to me.
 
^
laugh.gif
Well sounds like you're gonna hate the XX3.

Idea -- They have heel and forefoot Zoom units and I'm fairly sure just a molded TPU midfoot shank. That "carbon fiber" at the midfoot has neverbeen actual carbon fiber...it's just a woven synthetic to give a similar look and its the TPU that houses that woven material at the midfoot that'lllend support.
 
I had a pair of the OG Hi versions, and i played in em so much i could see the heel air sole unit.
 
considering i haven't worn a jordan since the stealth 20s (which i just hooped in tonight and they're starting to suck as the traction wears down eventhough they've never touched asphalt, just hardwood), i doubt i'm getting 23s anytime soon. anything past XIV ain't even a real jordan to me.


can't wait to get the black/zests to hoop in.


carbon fiber is overrated. i've never felt energy return and one man's stability is another man's stiffness. give me forefoot zoom and i'm goodto go on court whether bball or vball.
smokin.gif
 
breaking in is definitely the tough part. took a couple of times of discomfort in the black/zest before it felt comfortable especially in the forefoot for me.Also this is a retro so it could explain why i am gonna use this for profiling rather than balling. the heel lockdown is bad, reminds me of the zoom kobe 1. icould feel my heel sliding up and down. not good news at all. traction is adequate. i did not slide around the courts too much. no carbon fiber at all. thejordan 11 was the first shoe to incorporate it. just zoom air like the zoom bb. not a bad shoe for the mid 90s but with all the other choices around now, iwill stick with the kobe 2 or jordans. but i bought this for memories sake. i wore this in my 12th grade. ha ha.
 
an update, heel pain and a sprained left ankle. thanks for the memories. back to profiling in these black/zest 95s.
 
Originally Posted by slefly

the heel lockdown is bad, reminds me of the zoom kobe 1. i could feel my heel sliding up and down. not good news at all.

That's going to happen since it's such a stiff shoe. You need to break in the shoe more - especially the 'bend' in the forefoot.
 
lol, its not the forefoot or the stiffness. the cut in the heel does not lock my ankle down well. some shoes do like the kobe 2s, the jordan 13s and 14s. not abad shoe at all, i love the looks but i had also sprained my ankle in deez.
 
Originally Posted by Mattgical

First of all, I used them to play volleyball in. Since vball and bball involve the same movements, it should apply the same to hoops.

mean very stiff (viagra level).

Mattgical, excellent review....one thought on your review.

I agree and I disagree with your statement that VB/BB have the same movements. I play both weekly as well and I do notice I am much harder on my hoops shoesthan I am with my VB shoes.

Case in point....I can comfortable wear shoes with weak ankle support (like the AJ VII or even low cut hoop shoes) and lower quality retro hoop shoes (like AirForce Maxs or AJ V Retros) for volleyball. But for hoops those do not support me nor give me the cushioning I need.

I rely mainly on newer technology shoes like Lebron IV or V, Zoom BBs or AZK 2s/3s for hoops. The movements are similar, but I feel that for hoops I reallypush them....and I am small (5'6").

LOL at the viagra comment!
smile.gif
 
First off: I am 5'10" 200 lb. Pull up J's, still try to get to the hole (just can't jumpanymore. 34 will do that to you). Tight defense on the ball and rebound well. My current rotation is Crazy 8, AZK1, Uptempo (Duke), LB 4, T-Mac 6, Answer 9. Asyou can see, I am not biased on any brand. I only used these for two hours last night (5 p/u games), so I don't know about durability of the Zoom or seamsyet.

Fit and comfort: I wear a 10.5-11 in all of the above, and these fit me with a 10.5. Snug on the forefoot,even though these are some of the widest looking shoes I own. The sole is extremely wide. Lining is smooth, no rough spots, although laced tight I experiencedsome pinky discomfort after two hours. Not much, and it may have been my sock seam, but noticeable. The ankle opening seems wide, but the stiff collar laces uptight when tied that way. But pull them TIGHT for no ankle slip. I experienced a little slip on initial try on, and after I played a game or tow, it was reallynoticeable. I pulled them as tight as I could and no movement in any direction. The stiffness described by some was never felt, and I bought these at 5:00, wason the court by 5:30, and they felt great straight out of the box. I wear no-show socks, and never felt any rubbing or chafing anywhere.

Cushion and support: This is where I was surprised. The Zoom in these feels better now than my AZK1 did out ofthe box, and the longer I played in them, the more responsive they got. They have that stiff, bouncy Zoom, not the mushy breed like I found the AZK 3 to be. Icould really feel the spring on take-off when running/jumping, and there was no shock on landing. Plainly, these felt great. I would put them up against anyshoe right now as far as cushioning. The "wheels" on the side are actually an extended heel counter, keeping your heel/foot stable and over the shoe.This is a great innovation considering when these were made. It isn't carbon fiber, but a fiber mesh weave covered in a clear plastic, and these are themain reason for the bulky look of the shoe, and contribute greatly to the wide base. However, this shoe feels anything but bulky. My feet never felt unstable,and to tell the truth, whether it was nostalgia making me feel young again or if true, I felt about two steps quicker on defense. Make fun, but let and old guydream.

Traction/Anything else: The wavy herringbone pattern led to know slips on our clean indoor court. It evencontributed to lots of squeaking and quick stops, both on offense and defense. The treads are deep, but the material is pretty soft, so they may not last longoutdoors. I usually don't comment on creasing, because if you knew some of the shoes I wore out, you would see I don't care, but they show very littlecreasing, no busted stitches, and the sole is still intact. I do have a little squeaking in the heel Zoom on my right shoe, but nothing worth complainingabout. The stiffness some talked about was non-existent for me. I thought the materials and looks are dead on for the OG's, rich nu-buck and the carbonmaterial on the sides is exact. Look great. These definitely turned heads, since J-Kidd just got traded here, and I was playing right before the Mavs game atUT-Arlington, so J-Kidd was on the mind.

Overall, I chose these over the AZK 3, Zoom 96, LB 5, or Jordan XXII. Still a great shoe, instant classic, andI have no regrets or concerns playing in these against any other shoe out there. I know this contradicts what the first reviewer said, and maybe me beingheavier than him affects the Zoom and break-in, but I saw none of the cons he described.
 
Originally Posted by B1LLY HOYLE

^
laugh.gif
Well sounds like you're gonna hate the XX3.

Idea -- They have heel and forefoot Zoom units and I'm fairly sure just a molded TPU midfoot shank. That "carbon fiber" at the midfoot has never been actual carbon fiber...it's just a woven synthetic to give a similar look and its the TPU that houses that woven material at the midfoot that'll lend support.

Heel Nike Air...not zoom.
 
Haha duke4005,

I am the same stats as you. I have the same variety and rotation as you and I was also contemplating on balling in the Zm95 when I get them. However, Iwouldn't pass on the Lebron V. Those things are so awesome to ball in! Thanks for the review!!
 
I played for about an hour yesterday in the zoom 95's, and I like them. I think once they are really broken in, it's gonna hold a permanent spot in myrotation.

Side note: Hey B1lly Hoyle, man everytime I see one of your posts, I want to watch the movie
laugh.gif
. I had to buy another copy of the movie recently, and it just never gets old.
 
Back
Top Bottom