General discussion about a player's skills and potential isn't pointless, attempting to make direct one-to-one comparisons is. You keep making he point about college stats being situational and skewed. Guess what, the same is true of the NBA! How can you make these narrow, specific projections...
It's not fun though, it's stupid and pointless. How else do you suggest we project Wiggins ability as a pro aside from looking at his performance in college? I can say that to me, he looks like a very good driver, great at drawing fouls, good shooter with fine mechanics, great defensive impact...
This is exactly the type of comment that prevents reasonable discourse on this site. "Pull the cape out"? Grow the **** up man, I wasn't literally saying you were the one hyping him up, I was making a general point about amateur spectators making proclamations about prospects based on <10 hours...
Yeah, and that hype was blown up due to the media and internet commenters like yourself. People are reacting to hype they themselves propagated. Do you not see the problem there? It's not like Wiggins came out and declared himself the next Lebron. I also think people have a tenuous at best...
I think Wiggins is the only player who can score 41 (and have an all around game-changing impact like he did in that second half, since I know most people weren't actually watching) and people will spend more words finding criticisms than praise. I heard ESPN spend 5 minutes talking about how...