R.I.P Trayvon

-The fact that there had been several break ins in the area, plus the fact that this dude is wandering around at night when it's raining.
-Trayvon had a cell phone on him.  If he was concerned that a man was following him at night when it's raining, he could of called 911.
-Nothing wrong with a non-violent confrontation.  Nothing wrong with legally carrying a weapon. 
-Gorgone acknowledged that environmental conditions such as humidity or rain could have washed surfaces clean of DNA. (No_Limit_N*gga is Trayvons twitter handle btw..)
-Zimmerman did not pursue Trayvon against police wishes, a dispatcher is in NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM a police officer.  

Dunksondunks what exactly does "No Limit Ni**a" mean to you?
 
Last edited:
View media item 481201
These are nail brushes. These are made to clean your fingernails because even with water and other environmental factors it's a bit hard to remove some of the things that get caught up in fingernails.

But rain can wash away any blood and skin particles from a huge beating ? okay
 
He's entitled to his opinions.

He is entiled to his opinion which is why I didn't say

"stop posting dunks"


I just dont get why people quote the same person over and over again just to say they dont agree lol.


Cops do it all the time.



GZ is not a cop, cops try to save lives because they want to to skip extra paper work.

I wouldn't save the life of someone trying to kill me
 
Last edited:
He is entiled to his opinion which is why I didn't say

"stop posting dunks"


I just dont get why people quote the same person over and over again just to say they dont agree lol.
GZ is not a cop, cops try to save lives because they want to to skip extra paper work.

I wouldn't save the life of someone trying to kill me

I asked a question in regards to the mentioning of the twitter handle.
I was in no way trying to argue or disagree with his opinion.
So maybe you will share with me what the phrase "No Limit Ni**a" means to you when someone uses it to describe his or her self?
 
Its sad to see this in America ....if it was the other way around where a black dude followed a white teen and proceeded to kill him the black dude would of been got the death penalty a long time ago :smh: sad but true.
 
Its sad to see this in America ....if it was the other way around where a black dude followed a white teen and proceeded to kill him the black dude would of been got the death penalty a long time ago :smh: sad but true.
Because black people are pre-disposed to crime and violence, there is no benefit of the doubt or innocent until proven guilty :smh:
 
I think it went down like this:


Zimmerman followed a suspicious individual
Trayvon got paranoid (dat weed)
Trayvon confronted Zimmerman for following him
Trayvon went 'No_Limit_Ni***' on Zimmerman
Zimmerman stood his ground
Trayvon caught one in the chest

:wow: :rofl: Question? Are you still in high school? Middle school maybe? Zimmerman was 28, carrying a weapon... and killed a 17 year old high school student. It wouldnt matter if TM was strung out, bumping Wacka Flocka naked and selling crack. He was unarmed... GZ could've/ shouldve just called the cops if he felt a "suspicious" individual was in the neighborhood... He followed the kid around... I'm sure u think he followed him with no intention to confront him right? In ur scenario GZ was following but didn't ever plan on catching the "suspect" :wow: Ur scenario sounds ridiculous... Sounds like GZ is a sick individual who knew the law from his classes, and acted in a way, where he honestly felt he could kill someone and get off on a loophole.
 
Last edited:
I was watching HLN and they brought up a good point. If the fight started at the T of the sidewalk and GZ claims that he never went down the dark area of the T, (between the houses) then how did TM's dead body end in the dark area of the T? GZ actually did go down the dark area between the houses chasing after TM and that's why the confrontation happened. Hopefully the prosecution capitalizes on that during their closing.

I know I know... obvious post is obvious. :lol:

Zimmerman's story has been full of inconsistencies since the whole situation happened. It sounds like more than anything that they are arguing the justification in regards to the Stand Your Ground Law and I don't really see how being that Zimmerman pursued Martin. In regards to the law, Zimmerman had the opportunity to avoid a situation where he feels his life was being threatened. He was at a safe distance then ignored the dispatcher's request of not pursuing Martin. Once he pursued Martin, then it actually became Martin who could attack in regards to the law in order to prevent imminent harm to himself.

Even if Zimmerman did sustain bruises from the altercation, he is the aggressor and provoked Martin. I don't get how this trial is dragging out this long if you use common sense and the law. But what do I know, I'm not a lawyer or judge
 
Yea and why was his body like 50 feet from the sidewalk.

Either way it go gz is guilty of manslaughter. His reckless actions caused a death

Gz could have avoid a confitmation but he did not so the self defense is out the window.

And dunks if a stranget is following you at night then approach you would u going to do? Say hi amd give him a hug
 
Last edited:
Yea and why was his body like 50 feet from the sidewalk.

Either way it go gz is guilty of manslaughter. His reckless actions caused a death
Zimmerman's story has been full of inconsistencies since the whole situation happened. It sounds like more than anything that they are arguing the justification in regards to the Stand Your Ground Law and I don't really see how being that Zimmerman pursued Martin. In regards to the law, Zimmerman had the opportunity to avoid a situation where he feels his life was being threatened. He was at a safe distance then ignored the dispatcher's request of not pursuing Martin. Once he pursued Martin, then it actually became Martin who could attack in regards to the law in order to prevent imminent harm to himself.

Even if Zimmerman did sustain bruises from the altercation, he is the aggressor and provoked Martin. I don't get how this trial is dragging out this long if you use common sense and the law. But what do I know, I'm not a lawyer or judge

Thats what I keep saying all along.

Standing ovation partner
 
Yea and why was his body like 50 feet from the sidewalk.

Either way it go gz is guilty of manslaughter. His reckless actions caused a death
Zimmerman's story has been full of inconsistencies since the whole situation happened. It sounds like more than anything that they are arguing the justification in regards to the Stand Your Ground Law and I don't really see how being that Zimmerman pursued Martin. In regards to the law, Zimmerman had the opportunity to avoid a situation where he feels his life was being threatened. He was at a safe distance then ignored the dispatcher's request of not pursuing Martin. Once he pursued Martin, then it actually became Martin who could attack in regards to the law in order to prevent imminent harm to himself.

Even if Zimmerman did sustain bruises from the altercation, he is the aggressor and provoked Martin. I don't get how this trial is dragging out this long if you use common sense and the law. But what do I know, I'm not a lawyer or judge

Thats what I keep saying all along.

Standing ovation partner


Common sense ain't that common.
 
There was no surveillance system in the gated community? Also, the girl he was talking to said he was on the phone using a headset, how did the phone call get cut off? Wouldn't she hear the entire encounter, or did he hang up somehow? 
 
There was no surveillance system in the gated community? Also, the girl he was talking to said he was on the phone using a headset, how did the phone call get cut off? Wouldn't she hear the entire encounter, or did he hang up somehow? 

I believe the phone fell or his headphones came out during the confrontation
 
Back
Top Bottom