- 5,704
- 2,698
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
Julius Wrek
2014 NBA Off-Season; Paul George suffers a double-compund-fracture, likely out for season. Speedy re
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by japanair21,
- Start date
- Status
- 6,369
- 2,426
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
on one hand you're saying he's straight $ wise..... on the other you're saying he shouldn't take a pay cut
or am I reading into this incorrectly?
- 17,773
- 9,625
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
Bout time...
- 24,961
- 12,743
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
And besides that, where did anyone make Dirk and Duncan take less? They aren't setting any kind of precedent... The market still dictated they could get max dollars if they wanted them.
The intangible/sentimental stuff at this point in their careers is more valuable to them than a few extra million... That's their prerogative, not a precedent.
The intangible/sentimental stuff at this point in their careers is more valuable to them than a few extra million... That's their prerogative, not a precedent.
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- 16,006
- 4,734
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
Mike Miller trying to go to Dener and get FADED legally, that's why he's torn between the Nuggets and Cavs 
He knows damn well it's wing heavy in Denver, he won't see too many minutes.
He knows damn well it's wing heavy in Denver, he won't see too many minutes.
Last edited:
MVP
Supporter
- 81,884
- 82,848
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Is that not what the NBA is now and has been for the last 30 years?
I'm talking about specifically the top guys (LeBron, KD) who are vastly underpaid and all these mid tier guys are reaping the benefits. Let Bron and KD get the 40 mil/yr they deserve and we'll start to see some real choices and team construction have to take place, it actually may spread the wealth across the league. You give them a hard cap of 100 million and you have one guy taking up 40-50% of that, you're going to have to actually do your job as an organization.
- 53,302
- 30,786
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2002
they talk about it but it was basically okc/sas/lac/heat/pacers
vegas basically had three teams and everyone else
im okay with a few teams with legit shots of winning. still have some entertaining teams
Last edited:
- 5,704
- 2,698
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
Oh, its Wade County again...
Julius Wrek
Julius Wrek
- 17,773
- 9,625
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
LOL
- 6,369
- 2,426
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
now they back on Wade's nuts again after they was ready to sacrifice him to the Lebron Gods...
I see you Miami ....
I see you Miami ....
VinMillerHearn58
formerly lakersreppa008
- 15,096
- 3,580
- Joined
- May 5, 2006
Happy for Wade. I thought they always called it Wade-County? When did it end?
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
n's aint loyal man. only want you when they need you
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2012
Rio wishes it became his county
- 5,704
- 2,698
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
Julius Wrek
do work son
Banned
- 17,118
- 5,186
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
Yes. No such thing as making too much money.
offset pow clow
Banned
- 5,567
- 1,209
- Joined
- May 24, 2014
Those mid-tier players arent seeing that endorsment $$$ like those "underpaid" players, but like dame said counting another mans pockets is suspect & i hate that people judge a player based on what he makes & when he plays "bad" hes overpaid
if these "underpaid" players accepted these contracts, why are we saying they're underpaid if they agreed to it, it never made sense to me, dave chappelle said money is comfort & obviously those "underpaid" players are more comfortable than those mid-tier "overpaid" players
antidope
Supporter
- 62,411
- 65,312
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
What is Ron Artest doing in that picture next to Spo?Yikes....
- 28,226
- 3,086
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2009
so does that mean the bulls can sign another FA?
- 6,369
- 2,426
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
Boozer being sold at auction....
- 17,773
- 9,625
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
The Bulls should sign Jameer Nelson, just to play it safe
MVP
Supporter
- 81,884
- 82,848
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
A trip down memory lane:
Cavs owners seem to like these letters.
A Letter from Gordon Gund Regarding Carlos Boozer
RSS
12
July 14th, 2004
To: Cavaliers Fans
From: Gordon Gund
I know last week’s developments with respect to Carlos Boozer are a source of extreme disappointment for you. I want to assure you that I feel exactly the same way. Like you, I believed in Carlos.
Several days have now gone by. This has helped me to gain perspective. I hope this letter will do the same for you.
First, Jim Paxson has taken a tremendous amount of criticism in the media for what happened. As the team owner, I made the decision not to pick up the option on Carlos’ contract. Any criticism should be directed to me, not to Jim Paxson. I want to be very clear that any fault is mine.
Up until late last week when the trust was broken, I believed in Carlos Boozer, the player, and Carlos Boozer, the person. That is why I tried to do what he said he wanted. We tried to do right by him, by the team and by you in trusting in his repeated insistence that if we showed him respect, he would show respect to us.
Carlos and his agent first approached us in December of 2003, stating his desire for financial security as well as his desire to remain in Cleveland and be a key part of the future of this franchise. He and his agent made it very clear that if we respected them, and provided the security he was looking to gain, he would respect us. Given his record on the court, with the franchise, and in the community, we had every reason to believe his commitment.
Over the course of several months, we had multiple meetings that involved Carlos, his wife and his agent. In our most recent meeting on June 30, Jim Paxson and I told Carlos we had two options. He could play this year on his existing contract and test the market for free agency next year, or we could elect not to exercise the option if we had the understanding with him that as soon as legally possible he would negotiate a contract with us for the maximum we could pay him under league rules.
I told him that as we could not have an agreement at that time given the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, we would have to trust one another’s intentions. I said I define trust as his intention to stay in Cleveland and enter into a long term contract with us as soon as possible under the league rules. In that meeting, we were clear with him that he could make more money in the open market a year from now than we could pay him by redoing his contract this year. I told him he needed to understand that and we did not want him to later think we had taken advantage of him. Jim told him, “There are at least seven teams that have cap space right now who will want to pay you more than we can now. We don’t want to lose you. Why would we not pick up the option?” Carlos said “Because we'd like long term security and we want to stay in Cleveland.” Carlos went on to say that he was happy to be a Cavalier and never indicated any concern with his role on the team or his relationship with Coach Silas.
Carlos, his wife and his agent – all of whom were in that room -- knew what our maximum ability would be to pay him. Both Carlos and his wife responded that they wanted financial security now and therefore were anxious to pursue the second option of entering into a long term contract with us as soon as possible and that they would live with any consequences from this decision.
Carlos’ agent then said he wanted to go to another room to talk with his client and his wife alone which they did. When they returned, his agent said he had again explained everything to them so that they understood everything involved and said that their thinking had not changed.
Jim Paxson then told him, “We'd like to begin, as soon as permissible, to negotiate an agreement that we can sign on July 14th.” Carlos responded, “That’s exactly what I want. I want to get this done as quickly as we can.”
Over time Carlos had told Jim and me repeatedly, “If you show respect for me, I will show respect for you.” So, in the June 30 meeting, I reminded him of that and said, “We are all counting on what you said in earlier meetings and again today.” He responded, “That’s right and you can trust me on that.” I asked if we could all trust each other? Carlos, his wife and agent each responded “Yes.” At that point, believing so strongly in Carlos, I said we would not pick up his option. Our intent, as soon as we could do so, was to re-do his contract. The quotes you saw in the media July 1 about his desire to remain here were entirely consistent with what he told us.
In the final analysis, I decided to trust Carlos and show him the respect he asked for. He did not show that trust and respect in return. That’s what happened. I wanted you to hear it directly from me. The decision was mine and I take full responsibility.
We currently have no intention of matching Utah's offer to Carlos. In order to match it, and within the restrictions of the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, we would need to make player personnel moves of such a magnitude that it would have significant negative impact on our team moving forward. We are continuing to look at every possible option that will allow us to improve our team and continue to build on the tremendous momentum we have experienced in recent years. More than ever, we are committed to bringing a championship to this city. Thank you for your continued support of the Cleveland Cavaliers.
RSS
12
July 14th, 2004
To: Cavaliers Fans
From: Gordon Gund
I know last week’s developments with respect to Carlos Boozer are a source of extreme disappointment for you. I want to assure you that I feel exactly the same way. Like you, I believed in Carlos.
Several days have now gone by. This has helped me to gain perspective. I hope this letter will do the same for you.
First, Jim Paxson has taken a tremendous amount of criticism in the media for what happened. As the team owner, I made the decision not to pick up the option on Carlos’ contract. Any criticism should be directed to me, not to Jim Paxson. I want to be very clear that any fault is mine.
Up until late last week when the trust was broken, I believed in Carlos Boozer, the player, and Carlos Boozer, the person. That is why I tried to do what he said he wanted. We tried to do right by him, by the team and by you in trusting in his repeated insistence that if we showed him respect, he would show respect to us.
Carlos and his agent first approached us in December of 2003, stating his desire for financial security as well as his desire to remain in Cleveland and be a key part of the future of this franchise. He and his agent made it very clear that if we respected them, and provided the security he was looking to gain, he would respect us. Given his record on the court, with the franchise, and in the community, we had every reason to believe his commitment.
Over the course of several months, we had multiple meetings that involved Carlos, his wife and his agent. In our most recent meeting on June 30, Jim Paxson and I told Carlos we had two options. He could play this year on his existing contract and test the market for free agency next year, or we could elect not to exercise the option if we had the understanding with him that as soon as legally possible he would negotiate a contract with us for the maximum we could pay him under league rules.
I told him that as we could not have an agreement at that time given the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, we would have to trust one another’s intentions. I said I define trust as his intention to stay in Cleveland and enter into a long term contract with us as soon as possible under the league rules. In that meeting, we were clear with him that he could make more money in the open market a year from now than we could pay him by redoing his contract this year. I told him he needed to understand that and we did not want him to later think we had taken advantage of him. Jim told him, “There are at least seven teams that have cap space right now who will want to pay you more than we can now. We don’t want to lose you. Why would we not pick up the option?” Carlos said “Because we'd like long term security and we want to stay in Cleveland.” Carlos went on to say that he was happy to be a Cavalier and never indicated any concern with his role on the team or his relationship with Coach Silas.
Carlos, his wife and his agent – all of whom were in that room -- knew what our maximum ability would be to pay him. Both Carlos and his wife responded that they wanted financial security now and therefore were anxious to pursue the second option of entering into a long term contract with us as soon as possible and that they would live with any consequences from this decision.
Carlos’ agent then said he wanted to go to another room to talk with his client and his wife alone which they did. When they returned, his agent said he had again explained everything to them so that they understood everything involved and said that their thinking had not changed.
Jim Paxson then told him, “We'd like to begin, as soon as permissible, to negotiate an agreement that we can sign on July 14th.” Carlos responded, “That’s exactly what I want. I want to get this done as quickly as we can.”
Over time Carlos had told Jim and me repeatedly, “If you show respect for me, I will show respect for you.” So, in the June 30 meeting, I reminded him of that and said, “We are all counting on what you said in earlier meetings and again today.” He responded, “That’s right and you can trust me on that.” I asked if we could all trust each other? Carlos, his wife and agent each responded “Yes.” At that point, believing so strongly in Carlos, I said we would not pick up his option. Our intent, as soon as we could do so, was to re-do his contract. The quotes you saw in the media July 1 about his desire to remain here were entirely consistent with what he told us.
In the final analysis, I decided to trust Carlos and show him the respect he asked for. He did not show that trust and respect in return. That’s what happened. I wanted you to hear it directly from me. The decision was mine and I take full responsibility.
We currently have no intention of matching Utah's offer to Carlos. In order to match it, and within the restrictions of the NBA's Collective Bargaining Agreement, we would need to make player personnel moves of such a magnitude that it would have significant negative impact on our team moving forward. We are continuing to look at every possible option that will allow us to improve our team and continue to build on the tremendous momentum we have experienced in recent years. More than ever, we are committed to bringing a championship to this city. Thank you for your continued support of the Cleveland Cavaliers.
Cavs owners seem to like these letters.
- 11,611
- 1,134
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
It didn't. But you know people wanna be sarcastic and reach for laughs like the city was handed over to LeBron or somethingHappy for Wade. I thought they always called it Wade-County? When did it end?
- 11,611
- 1,134
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
Rumor that boozer wants to be on miami
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Phil Hecken @PhilHecken 12m
The Hispanic Heritage jerseys for the upcoming season are NOT sleved. @PhilHecken @MySportsLegion pic.twitter.com/uTbY1Itpc2 (via @TheNBALatest)
View media item 1079920
da hell is the adidas logo doing on there?!?! don't tell me they moved Jerry to the back to make room for the adidas logo :x
they did
- Status