Originally Posted by dland24
This is the worst top 4 PG list I have ever seen in my life. I wholeheartedly disagree with every single ranking. You cant be serious right now.
You're argument would look better if you didn't expend so much effort trying to show me up. "Your argument is just as bad" "Made me cringe", etc.Originally Posted by Jay02
I cringed reading this post. Literally everything you said is wrong.
First off make an assist only when it's a highlight? What does that even mean? He passes up easy assists to those who are open because he doesnt have the opportunity to make the pass into a great highlight? You think Scott Skiles would be ok with that? No Like I said before Jennings has said he prefers to make the pass before shooting. If you watch him play he's the type that takes what you give him. Skiles has made it clear he wants to make Jennings become a smart player and you can see the progression. If anything Skiles is limiting Brandon his highlight plays. Given what the Bucks have surrounding BJ isnt helping him or Skiles. In time i think a balance will be found between flashy plays and smart plays. Currently the flashy plays are low. He's young and Skiles is emphasizing being smart, with more experience you'll then see the highlight plays increase.
Next, your argument for Wall is that he's a pure point gaurd while he's averaging 4 turnovers a game? Thats not very pure. My idea of a pure point gaurd is someone who can beat you in every way. That means shooting. You look at Paul and you know how he can disect defenses with his passing ability but what makes him pure is when you lay off to defend the passing lanes he'll knock down the jumper whether its a mid range shot or a three. Wall is shooting 9% from deep...srsly. Not pure.
The desire to play with Jennings. What about Jennings would make someone not want to play with him? Has anyone come out and openly said this? Derrick Rose isnt a pure point gaurd, definitely more of a scoring point gaurd..are you saying no one would want to play with him?
Jennings being a winner. Well, he got drafted and his rookie year he brought the Bucks back to the playoffs for the first time in around a decade. Got the 4th or 5th seed I believe. On the biggest run of the season Boguts elbow goes in 4 different directions right before the playoffs. Jennings was the only reason they somehow even made it to game 7. Showed he could step up in the bigger stage. Last year he breaks his foot, Bogut is still not anywhere near 100% and theres no other talent on the team to rely on. This year, surprise surprise Bogut done for the year again. Jennings do everything with nothing. So you see where im going with this. Jennings is by no mean solidified as a winner, but given what he's done with whas been provided to him thus far. No reason to think he cant be one.
Shooting. You just listed 3 percentages of improvement. Then implied he shoots too much when Wall averages the same amount of attempts as Jennings his first 2 years. This year Jennings attempts of jumped by 3 more per game, but notice its also his best year by percentage at 44% Soooo idk what you're getting at.
Wall gets frustrated but Jennings doesnt?
Your argument is as bad as the thread title. Everything about this thread is awful. Im not knocking Wall hes gonna be good and has alot of potential. He's got alot of room for improvement as does Jennings. Tut he has done nothing for anyone to say he's better than Jennings by a mile. It just shows me how little everyone actually watches Jennings play.
