- 7,072
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
Word seen tese n Modells for sale...
will be had on disco
CONFIRMED MAY 22nd 2010 Jordan Retro 2's Black/Red/White $135 OFFICAL THREAD **PICS UPDATED**
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by jarnailsingh23,
- Start date
- 2,145
- 934
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
Fed Ex just dropped these off today
group shot, just keeping the sz 10s
group shot, just keeping the sz 10s
- 14
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
I might have to get these
- 6
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
if these are lie the 94s, which they wont, then ill cop for sure, lol.
- 1,462
- 73
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
Isn't that an older Jordan box? Either way I need a pair.
- 1,462
- 73
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
Isn't that an older Jordan box? Either way I need a pair.
- 1,462
- 73
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
Isn't that an older Jordan box? Either way I need a pair.
- 1,462
- 73
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
My bad
- 38,366
- 75,666
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
^ Nice 04's up there
- 28,101
- 2,625
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
2 pairs.
Miss my pair i sold
Miss my pair i sold
- 30
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
Copped a pair yesterday. Leather quality isn't bad for the uppers but I'd definately invest in a pair of decreasers or forcefields for the toebox.
Details/shape and construction is honestly pretty nice though.
Details/shape and construction is honestly pretty nice though.
- 1,224
- 16
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
i'd definitely be getting these after browsing so many pics
but isn't it kinda heavy?
but isn't it kinda heavy?
- 72
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
I wore my '04 pair to da mall and compared them to da '10 pair. Not too many differences other than da NIKE being black on '10, red on '04. And da materials are thinner on da '10. And da "23" tag on da tongue is completely stitched to da shoe of da '10 instead of flapping like da '04s. But I compared my '04s to a GS pair of '10 and they have da same thickness, and da "23" tag is not completely stitched either. ONCE AGAIN, GS(kids) have received a better quality shoe.
- 55,132
- 62,328
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Again
- 977
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
Guys i need your opinion, i'm planning to buy an extra pair of aj2 retro i was wondering if i should buy the 2004 retro or the 2010.
- 472
- 17
- Joined
- May 22, 2003
^get the 10 man, don't even think think of getting the 04 because you won't be able to enjoy them for too long , probably you would get a very desicated pair by now
- 977
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
thanks dude.
- 55,132
- 62,328
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
I disagree, he can still wear the 2004 and wear them for a long time. He doesn't have to worry about crumbling or cloudy air bubbles. The main problem with old Nike's are normally glue, sole crumbling and air bubbles. With the II you don't have that problem. The sole is hard like the Dunk or Air Force One and will last a long time. I still have a pair of jeweled Air Force Ones from the mid 90's and they've outlived all of my other sneakers from the 90's.
I haven't seen the 2010's up close, but the 2004's wrinkled. The 2004's look like they're thicker. So from a quality aspect and you're not concerned about price I might buy the 2004's.
If the differences are minimal I would suggest he wait until the 2010's go on sale. These will be on sale for $99 or less in a couple of months.
- 557
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
famn i need them in my feet
- 615
- 136
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2000
Those remind me of 6th grade!!! Wish I could cop but I'm so low on funds.
- 4,997
- 976
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
Wonder if these will crease like the 04's
- 133
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
Definately cop
- 133
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
I need those bad
- 185
- 28
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
I'm ready for the 22nd... Lost my 04s in a game of NBA live 05 lol
- 185
- 28
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
I'm ready for the 22nd... Lost my 04s in a game of NBA live 05 lol
