- 6,672
- 5,954
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2001
Epic Fail ! ~ The Air Jordan 2009 about to set record low sales
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by babyjordan0312,
- Start date
- 216
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
too bad the ones and those damn 6 rings didnt have low sale for the weekend. that would have gave them a small problem.
Hopefully it would wake JB up to lower prices and to give us retros with the great quality. I'm sure I'm not the only one that feels that way,
but I doubt it would happen. It shame when shoes first came out they were around $100 now they are $150-$160 when they are making more money than
they did back then.
Hopefully it would wake JB up to lower prices and to give us retros with the great quality. I'm sure I'm not the only one that feels that way,
but I doubt it would happen. It shame when shoes first came out they were around $100 now they are $150-$160 when they are making more money than
they did back then.
- 5,339
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
i hope j may drops on the designer totem pole, this was a horrible shoe, i dont even care if it was number 23, its ugly. and what does fencing have to do withjordan brand?
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
Next time, don't be a jerk. You've been reported for having an image in your signature.
Your spelling and grammar could use some work as well.
- 633
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2007
ha i knew it like i said im onlying buying these when they hit the outlets for 50 bucks
- 383
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
saw them in person at the mall today.
still don't like em.
- 9,370
- 4,184
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
I honestly like this shoe a lot..i have yet to try it on and i am lookin forward to when i do..however..i am not a fool..and JB will not get my money for avery long time in regards to this shoe..no more than 75 bucks will i pay for this..and believe me..they will drop in price rather quickly..that is if they arenot RTVed first..
- 370
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
I saw the white ones at the mall yesterday...The materials aren't up to par with the S23s.
- 2,526
- 14
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
^???
The only difference is patent versus leather. And the leather is better.
The only difference is patent versus leather. And the leather is better.
- 3,042
- 491
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
I saw these yesterday for the first time at NT. To be honest, they looked slightly better than the photos, but I still wouldn't buy them no matter howcheap they become in the future.
First time ever I'd take the new Kobe's or Lebron's over the new Jordan.
First time ever I'd take the new Kobe's or Lebron's over the new Jordan.
- 370
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
The "leather" on the white ones felt synthetic...The jumpman logo on the tongue looks like cardboard...The carbon fiber on the bottom didn't lookas good...These are just my subjective observations and from experience in examining both, I feel that some of the materials used on the s23 are better.
- 68
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
my co workers said they are high heel shoes
- 14,038
- 14,200
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
i saw htese in person for the 1st time yesterday and i see why. these things really look AWEFUL!! they look way better in pics. i would not buy these!!
- 549
- 736
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
Ok NTers. First although it looks like I'm new I'm not. I have been here since the beginning and many of you would know me by my previous name but hereare the facts.
Shoe is over priced. Yes.
This shoe on release date sold 38% less that the 23 but is sold over 5% of the 19s 7.3% over the 21s and 4.8% over the 22s. Also an increase of over 10% of the18s. Take it for what its worth.
Get informed NT. Please. All who passed will have a missing link in their collection. Don't hate NT U R sounding ridiculous.
Shoe is over priced. Yes.
This shoe on release date sold 38% less that the 23 but is sold over 5% of the 19s 7.3% over the 21s and 4.8% over the 22s. Also an increase of over 10% of the18s. Take it for what its worth.
Get informed NT. Please. All who passed will have a missing link in their collection. Don't hate NT U R sounding ridiculous.
- 5,176
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- 149
- 10
- Joined
- May 5, 2005
But it is clear that when you release a Product that looks to the untrained eye, to be a Reebok product worth HALF the price. Jordan fans will not swallow the 190 price tag!
my thoughts exactly.
- 167
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2006
- 8,025
- 216
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2001
Wearing Jordan's used to be a luxury...something exclusive...
Coming out with a million team shoes and even a bunch of retro's with crap quality (in hit or miss packs even) won't exactly turn someone on topurchase an $190 "signature" shoe.
Get a clue, JB. Seriously...
You're going the wrong direction.
Coming out with a million team shoes and even a bunch of retro's with crap quality (in hit or miss packs even) won't exactly turn someone on topurchase an $190 "signature" shoe.
Get a clue, JB. Seriously...
You're going the wrong direction.
- 209
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
yeah this shoe is terrible
- 33,406
- 39,138
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
you must work for jordan brand. haha, that's funny because the 18, 19, 21, and 22 are some of the worst jordans. lets face it, the jordan2009 is atrocious. there's NOTHING they could do to make me want to buy this piece of junk. in person it looks even worse to me. i hope it sits onshelves for months. the people working for that company need to get a clue. i do have to say, though, the XX3 is my favorite model. it's too bad thatthey couldn't follow up with something just as worthy to have the jumpman stamped on it.
- 3,030
- 542
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2004
despite bad economy we saw cdp flying out of the shelves .. so i doubt economy as bad as it is it s not the main reason y they didnt sell... quality ... mmm weseen worse i believe .. to me its just the all 09 concept that sucks,,, imo ..
wouldnt buy these unless they hit the racks... just say ima retro sneakerhead
wouldnt buy these unless they hit the racks... just say ima retro sneakerhead
- 850
- 77
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
JB deserves this.
mjshoefanatic
Banned
- 9,355
- 361
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
I really want this shoe just not for $190.
- 8,489
- 1,651
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
Saw these in person today. looking at it from different angles, It just screams XIVs to me. The heel disappointed me the most.
- 67
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2003
Economy is in the dump, and JB releases a $200 shoe? People are losing their jobs left and right, and JB still sets it price super high.....Granted, most ofthe people that buy this shoe are going to find ways of getting it anyway...but cmon, 190?
People are being more selective than ever when it comes to spending their money. People demand that that dollar goes further than ever...and for that price,you could get a hyperdunk and throw $80 in the bank.
The Kobes are also overpriced in my opinion...more expensive than the HDs?? Cmon. Nothing is going to change though...as they are going to keep vomiting outlow quality shoes, at teribly high prices. I mean, there IS the ZoomKD...eeh
People are being more selective than ever when it comes to spending their money. People demand that that dollar goes further than ever...and for that price,you could get a hyperdunk and throw $80 in the bank.
The Kobes are also overpriced in my opinion...more expensive than the HDs?? Cmon. Nothing is going to change though...as they are going to keep vomiting outlow quality shoes, at teribly high prices. I mean, there IS the ZoomKD...eeh
