- 13,868
- 44
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
bumping it for ninjahood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
no vettes come with that kind hp, i dont know why i put stock.Originally Posted by Gully Gabe
Originally Posted by Joseph Camel Jr
lol seriously?
not that the murci is a good performer anyway, but you could get a stock 90s vette with like 1200 hp for less than either and blow them both away in a straight line. what does that prove?
Stock 90's vette's don't come with 1200hp....
Originally Posted by Essential1
still would cop the Lambo if I had the money.
Originally Posted by KiNGJRMZair23
Originally Posted by sixersdukejordan
^^^ Holy %$!! I thought the Challenger would beast that Benz
IMO challengers are not that fast. I test drive cars at work. And those Mercedes with the 6.3 AMG motor are just baaad.
everyone does though, not just american car companies. 3200 lbs = ferrari f430.Originally Posted by mjd77
Originally Posted by KiNGJRMZair23
Originally Posted by sixersdukejordan
^^^ Holy %$!! I thought the Challenger would beast that Benz
IMO challengers are not that fast. I test drive cars at work. And those Mercedes with the 6.3 AMG motor are just baaad.
Well, from what I have researched, the Challenger is pushing 3800+ lbs. What a pig! I dont understand why american car companies just continue to make these lead sleds. The Camaro is the same way. Theres no reason those things cant be closer to 3200-3300 lbs tops.
Originally Posted by Joseph Camel Jr
everyone does though, not just american car companies. 3200 lbs = ferrari f430.Originally Posted by mjd77
Originally Posted by KiNGJRMZair23
Originally Posted by sixersdukejordan
^^^ Holy %$!! I thought the Challenger would beast that Benz
IMO challengers are not that fast. I test drive cars at work. And those Mercedes with the 6.3 AMG motor are just baaad.
Well, from what I have researched, the Challenger is pushing 3800+ lbs. What a pig! I dont understand why american car companies just continue to make these lead sleds. The Camaro is the same way. Theres no reason those things cant be closer to 3200-3300 lbs tops.
word its about the total packageOriginally Posted by nealraj006
You could say the same for nearly every car out there though. Turbo an s2k or Z and you'll come out on top of a good deal of cars, for a good deal less. You can turbo a civic for so much power as well. It's not just the money aspect, but what else comes with the car; the reputation, the satisfaction, etc.Originally Posted by HOLLAKID619
Originally Posted by PeediPeedi178
Nothing really...Originally Posted by Joseph Camel Jr
lol seriously?
not that the murci is a good performer anyway, but you could get a stock 90s vette with like 1200 hp for less than either and blow them both away in a straight line. what does that prove?
But it still would'nt be a Lam like someone said before you buying that car for the name. If you want a monster of a car there are many other options out there and configurations but I doubt that's on your mind when purchasing a Lambo.
Regardless, if your paying $300,000+ for a Lambo strictly for speed, that video just voided all reasons for paying that much.
i said stock Ford GT vs stock LP670-4 SV not no GT1000Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
Negetive
[h2]2006 Ford GT GT1000[/h2]Horsepower: 1000 @ RPM Torque: 865 @ RPM
Quarter Mile: 10.60 @ 142
2009 Lamborghini LP670-4 SV
Horsepower: 661
Torque: 487
Quarter Mile: 11.40 @ 125.8