- 15,198
- 16,012
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
I view it as a universal agreement. Nothing to do with a nation. But our and other nations recognize this agreement and have designated specific liberties as apart of it. Those man designated liberties should be extended to homosex relations in my opinion. I have no issue with reassigning what man has assigned. But when it interferes with Gods original design, an agreement between man and woman that transcends any government law, then it disturbs me. You are right, it has nothing to do with me specifically, thats why you will never see me protesting or devoting serious energy to take away from what they (gays) are trying to establish, but one thing I will always be is honest. And modifying what God has set in place, I can never get behind.[thread="630938"] [/thread]
This is where biblical adherence comes in.
As a Bible believer, God created all organically including man and woman.
He created them for each other. Their covenant with each other is marriage.
Its exclusive. So including homosex relationships in that is redefining what God has already defined according to scripture.
This covenant is the foundation of life and life does not spring forth from homosex bonds.
Thats what makes it an issue, including that union in marriage.
I dont expect you to agree but I hope I articulated this where you and others have clearer insight.
Marriage is a legal institution in the USA, so I don't see why any religious group should dictate what is allowed in a marriage. I guess I'm just not understanding how homosexual couples using the term marriage affects you. I get that it's against your beliefs, but that doesn't explain why they should use another term.
Last edited: