mateen cleaves
Banned
- 10,196
- 12
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
they better be releasing the ROY and AMARE knows tee's, they are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by AllDay AllNight
Wally I know I was just talking to you about the 2008 ZT1/Zoom Tennis Trainers, but it looks like I can hold off getting a pair of those if I can get these sometime soon
Originally Posted by BP the owner
A+ thread Wally!
i'm about to sign up for that nikemedia, i just might be back this weekend with something to look at
i do miss the velcro strap though...
Yes.
Keep your flywire and "patent pending" stuff.
Trainers wear straps. Bo knows it....
Great news anyway...
Originally Posted by KeonClark7
Does the upper even have Flywire? I haven't read or heard in the videos that it does...
A lightweight upper, with midfoot and forefoot overlays connected to the lacing system, works with an inner Dynamic Fit sleeve to provide a secure, glove-like fit and the lock-down support a foot needs. The mid-sole also features a Nike Max Air unit in the heel to provide impact protection and comfort.
that is the one true place to mention something spectacular like a flywire incorporation, but its not listed.
suguruvstotoro, thats the "evolution of nike trainers" for ya..zoom tr in 07 had a strap but the whole sparq and edge line which is about 15-17 models, the past 2 years worth of nike trainers, all are without it..
another thing im not exactly buying from the videos.. Is lighter really better? im a big person. i need some feeling of stability. a velcro strap does anawesome job of locking a foot in place.. also, synthetic materials are hardier, more durable, likely stronger, and cheaper, but there is truly nothing like asoft suede finish on a shoe.. comfort and flexibility is almost second rate here as they push this new age stuff like they have some sort of agenda. A monetaryagenda.. there is literally nothing wrong with the materials of yesteryear. but what do i know
all i do know is, the stiffness of the synthetic suede toebox that appears to be apparent on this model is far from desirable as it looks to be the same as the2002 and 2008 at1s. and if anyone knows me here, the must have at1 model is with the quality of the 2000 make.
I won't fall into the hype just yet. nike retros have been pushing synthetic materials since atleast 2002 on the vast majority of their models. Yet somehowthey are being praised here? Stronger, yes. More durable, yes. Less flexbility, yes. Loss of softness in the materials, yes. I mean who are we kidding here?I'm glad a place like NT is around where we can be objective about certain items
I'll push until i die, this model right here:
-original material quality
-sample seperated toebox, which at the time couldnt be done construction wise. but models like the zoom trainer and at1 ft accomplished that.. IT'S TIMENIKE.
Originally Posted by I GET PAPER
they kinda look like golf shoe=%##...bump those jacksons tho..oooh wee
these look sick but screw that neon green.Originally Posted by BP the owner
added a few modifications...