- 25,465
- 647
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
once i read what dude posted i knew u would be in this thread talking about it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
Originally Posted by 531
I also believe that Stuckey would beat AI in 1v1.
Originally Posted by suprafly36
Im checking in to show support for the trade. Our back court might not be as good. If AI cant deliver the ball it's going to hurt us. Is Stuckey going to play as much? Although we'll miss CB I felt he could step and scored more than he has.
And what does this open up DWade or LB23
hes gonna be a starOriginally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
Originally Posted by Goldmember
Didnt he wore #6 in a all star game? ...forgot what year was it? 03?
Originally Posted by BullsRepeat3Peat
Originally Posted by Goldmember
Didnt he wore #6 in a all star game? ...forgot what year was it? 03?
'02
Clutchshooter:at people goin nuts because it might be 23.
'he's wearing 3: 'nah pass'
'i mean 23: 'im gonna frame it!!!!!!'.
because the very number 23 itself is soooooo special right?
"noooooo it's what it meeeeaaaaannnss. it's magical!!!!!"
and numbers arent actually just intended for easy differentiation between players for refs correct?.
hypebeasting in full force.
Almost every time you post something critical, I feel better about myself, because I tend to take things too literally. I try to be more abstract,to loosen up and what not. Then I see you make a reply like that one and I feel better knowing that no matter how literal I take things, there's at leastone other person on the board less abstract and more literal (read: 'no fun') than me.
Dude, if someone even THOUGHT about wearing #32 for the Lakers, I'd riot.Nevermind that it's retired; no one should even think it.
No, it's not just a number.
#23 is no longer just a number in basketball.
Sorry.
It's just not.
It's not mystical, magical, or anything foolish... but it does have a more significant meaning than just being a 2 and a 3.
Almost every time you post something critical, I feel better about myself, because I tend to take things too literally. I try to be more abstract, to loosen up and what not. Then I see you make a reply like that one and I feel better knowing that no matter how literal I take things, there's at least one other person on the board less abstract and more literal (read: 'no fun') than me.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Clutchshooter:at people goin nuts because it might be 23.
'he's wearing 3: 'nah pass'
'i mean 23: 'im gonna frame it!!!!!!'.
because the very number 23 itself is soooooo special right?
"noooooo it's what it meeeeaaaaannnss. it's magical!!!!!"
and numbers arent actually just intended for easy differentiation between players for refs correct?.
hypebeasting in full force.
Exactly. I totally agree with this. To me, its not even THAT serious but its just a respect-type issue...Originally Posted by Greezee
Iverson is the REASON Stuckey is wearing number three anyway. He made that number popular. Nobody was rocking number three
like that before Iverson. Out of respect he needs to give that number up. You know Iverson is going to pay him. Besides, Iverson might not be there for long, Stuckey can get the number back when/if he leaves.
Originally Posted by daprescription
Originally Posted by BullsRepeat3Peat
Originally Posted by Goldmember
Didnt he wore #6 in a all star game? ...forgot what year was it? 03?
'02
.