Ronnie Fieg Collabs - Tracking order link http://shop.kithnyc.com/pages/tracking
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by bad lieutenant,
- Start date
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
dudes spend a lot more for a lot less.
- 70,545
- 112,010
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
No reason to not expect them to be around $165 or so like the West NYC release...Ughhh it sure would be nice to know the price on those 530s considering we're less than 10 days away now...
- 2,823
- 1,047
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
That's what I'm hoping but RF could just bump it up to $185 or $200 for no reason if he wanted to. $165 is right down my alley though
- 1,681
- 393
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
i would much rather pay 160 for these.. the west nyc's, while they were cool, were not justifiably worth 160...
- 70,545
- 112,010
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
I love my West NYCs, but yeah, they shouldn't have been $165.
- 1,483
- 661
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2014
It's confirmed: Ronnie Fieg x Nike x Coogi x Roger Federer. They're calling it the Ronger Foogi
- 5,046
- 4,154
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
Ronnie could do some good work on an Air Max 1
- 290
- 47
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2013
They'll prob be 150 with the 12 dollar shipping so slightly more than wests but the quality deff looks better
- 1,483
- 661
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2014
If these NB joints are more than $165 I'm out. Not worth the money.
- 1,483
- 1,171
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
The shoes were samples that are not being released tho hence the 1 of 6. But no, no one should spend that much on sneakers
- 1,574
- 1,047
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- 6,843
- 3,862
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
I'm saying they're releasing but who knows.....
- 646
- 180
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
May I ask what kind and how? I've dry cleaned every pair I wear, but now I only wear the navy ones occasionally. Too scared to throw em in the washer and dryer(?)
- 1,066
- 766
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
http://www.endclothing.co.uk/upcoming-releases/
[table][tr][td]New Balance x Kith M530KH[/td][td]TBC[/td][td]M530KH[/td][td]£105[/td][td]12/12/2014[/td][/tr][tr][td]New Balance x Kith M850KH[/td][td]TBC[/td][td]M850KH[/td][td]£105[/td][td]12/12/2014[/td][/tr][/table]
End is going to get them for about 105 pounds, or $165, so i'm guessing that's how much retail is going to be here
[table][tr][td]New Balance x Kith M530KH[/td][td]TBC[/td][td]M530KH[/td][td]£105[/td][td]12/12/2014[/td][/tr][tr][td]New Balance x Kith M850KH[/td][td]TBC[/td][td]M850KH[/td][td]£105[/td][td]12/12/2014[/td][/tr][/table]
End is going to get them for about 105 pounds, or $165, so i'm guessing that's how much retail is going to be here
- 1,518
- 615
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
isn't he doing an AM1 or was that just something arab lincoln posted just to stir some stuff up?
- 5,046
- 4,154
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
Who knows but it would make since, Ronnie does good things with classic runner's.
- 127
- 37
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2014
Those were the'Air Max Day' AM1's. Been confirmed that it wasn't a collab.
- 1,518
- 615
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2014
sources?
haha just kidding
haha just kidding
- 34,984
- 16,885
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2005
Well Damn
- 9,606
- 13,357
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- 2,210
- 889
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2012
- 634
- 198
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2014
It was one of my original black pair and it was more of an accident washing them. I always dry clean my pants as well.
- 2,823
- 1,047
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
Clutch! Thanks for that info. Any idea why their release date is different though?
- 634
- 198
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2014
Just thought I dropped my feedback also on the Classic Mercers since I received them yesterday. Like what the majority of mentioned already, the waist for sure matches what is listed on the site where they are about 2 sizes too big. So from the sense of comparing them to previous Mercers, the waist size lines up equally to the past. However the biggest difference as some have mentioned is the tapering of the legging portion. The pants are definitely more shorter to fix the "bunching" at the ankle with previous Mercers and much more tapered to give it more of a skinny jogger look. I am naturally a size 32 when it comes to non-jogger pants (ie. jeans) so for all my joggers, I always went with a size 30. This time around I followed Ronnie's tweets that these Mercers would fit TTS so I went with a size 32. Personally for me, the thigh/shin area fit me perfectly since I know if I went with a size 30, it would probably be too tight are the legging area. However the waist area is definitely a size or 2 too big. So the only explanation I have on why Ronnie recommended to go TTS was maybe because of the leg area and not necessarily around the waist...just my 2 cents.
Also as people already mentioned, the material is a lot thinner than previous Mercers. Hell the material on them is thinner than the material used in the Meekers from the Academy line. These Mercers sorta remind me of the Publish Legacy joggers when it comes to the material used. I was really hoping they would keep the material thickness used in their previous Mercers since the quality is soo much better. That is probably one reason why Ronnie decided to avoid his ongoing trend of increasing prices since the prices on these Mercers were cheaper than the past from what I recall ($120 vs. $135).
Hope this helps folks still trying to decide what size classic mercers to purchase.
Also as people already mentioned, the material is a lot thinner than previous Mercers. Hell the material on them is thinner than the material used in the Meekers from the Academy line. These Mercers sorta remind me of the Publish Legacy joggers when it comes to the material used. I was really hoping they would keep the material thickness used in their previous Mercers since the quality is soo much better. That is probably one reason why Ronnie decided to avoid his ongoing trend of increasing prices since the prices on these Mercers were cheaper than the past from what I recall ($120 vs. $135).
Hope this helps folks still trying to decide what size classic mercers to purchase.
Last edited:
