- 28,703
- 11,937
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
T-Mobile is good for me 90% of the time. There are certain buildings like my barbershop where I get zero service though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My MMS messaging was tripping on me last night, I assumed it was Textras fault. Still cant beat T-Mobile in terms of quality/priceI've been getting late texts on TMo lately. Heck, I dont even get LTE at home. If my monthly wasnt dirt cheap I wouldve jumped on Verizon months ago.
You can do a test drive online. You put your car as a deposit for the iphone 5s theyll send you. You test out the service for free. For 7 days.I see the majority of users in this thread use tmobile. You guys happy with the service? Thinking bout switching over to them, but you always hear about how tmobile and sprints networks suck balls. In any major city I get service will always be good, but is service outside the major city that bad? I do a lot of hiking in rural areas and would like to have my phone for emergencys haha. I'm on att and get coverage everyyyywhere
Appreciate any feedback.
It does what it needs to for me. I dont need service in the bottom of a mine shaft nor will I ever be in the Appalachian Mountains so I dont need AT&T and Verizon
RootMetrics’ latest report, which involved conducting an astonishing 5.7 million tests and testing more than 6,200 indoor locations across the United States,[COLOR=#red] found that T-Mobile finished last among all major carriers in terms of overall performance, network reliability, call performance and text performance[/COLOR]. The “Un-carrier” can hang its hat on beating Sprint in data performance and network speed, although it still trails both Verizon and AT&T by a substantial margin in both categories.
Hmm, I wouldn't quite call DallasIt does what it needs to for me. I dont need service in the bottom of a mine shaft nor will I ever be in the Appalachian Mountains so I dont need AT&T and Verizon
[COLOR=#red]Hmmm. Well I wouldn't quite consider Dallas Texas a mine shaft, nor the Appalachian mountains since Dallas proper is the 9th largest city in the US and the Dallas-Fort Worth Area is the 4th largest metro area in the United States. I lived in Dallas proper not even the suburbs and the signal was crappy and inconsistent like crazy. Then of course in the burbs it was even worse. I mean if at the end of the day peeps prefer T-Mobile because it's cheap than so be it, but those who demand a quality network will not even look at T-Mobile.
The amazing thing is that peeps in here will spend so much money buying multiple phones, but cheap out on service. That's like putting regular gas in a Rolls Royce Phantom [/COLOR]
RootMetrics’ latest report, which involved conducting an astonishing 5.7 million tests and testing more than 6,200 indoor locations across the United States,[COLOR=#red] found that T-Mobile finished last among all major carriers in terms of overall performance, network reliability, call performance and text performance[/COLOR]. The “Un-carrier” can hang its hat on beating Sprint in data performance and network speed, although it still trails both Verizon and AT&T by a substantial margin in both categories.
For the most part dallas looks good.
Bye felicia.
Coverage map has been updated to reflect cover atm. Aka if youre not receiving signal in xyz area tmo takes that into account and will show it on the coverage map.If you believe a coverage map from a carrier
[COLOR=#red] This dude right here using a coverage map as his argument. Coverage maps don't take into account network inconsistencies, dropped calls, inconsistent data, and poor penetration in buildings due to the spectrum that T-Mob uses which is trash. Try again
Just saw what SP posted. Exactly!
[/COLOR]
Just peeped.
Price for S6 Edge is...gonna have to reconsider now
Will the Edge flop? More expensive than the i6 (its direct competitor I'd like to think), and more expensive than the i6+ as well. No hardware superiority from the S6. They should've priced the Edge to be competitive with the i6.Galaxy S6 32GB – $0 down + $28.33/month x 24, $679.92
Galaxy S6 64GB – $99.99 down + $27.50/month x 24, $759.99
Galaxy S6 128GB – $199.99 down + $27.50/month x 24, $859.99
Galaxy S6 Edge 32GB – $0 down + $32.49/month x 24, $779.76
Galaxy S6 Edge 64GB – $99.99 down + $31.66/month x 24, $859.83
Galaxy S6 Edge 128GB – $199.99 down + $31.66/month x 24, $959.83
But the Edge would have to be marketed purely based on aesthetic, the curved screen has no benefits aside from appearance. Hard to justify an 100$ increase with no hardware benefits. Even the i6+ had hardware improvements over the i6 for the price difference. A curved screen and +500mAh isn't going to win over many consumers. Also unfortunately no, the S6 gets an electric blue kind of colour.It won't push as many units naturally but I think 'flop' is a pretty strong word.
Upon further review though, I have been feeling the S6 more whereas I was digging the Edge before. Does the S6 come in green?