- 147
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2001
anyone out there 'in the know' and willing to share wat the differences are between these 3 nike cushioning materials?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I second that.Originally Posted by never wear them
Lunar >>> AM
I second that.Originally Posted by never wear them
Lunar >>> AM
Originally Posted by scshift
From what I know:
-lunar foam is the actual material that was developed with NASA, it's the one in the Hyperdunk and Kobe IV that breaks down easily.
-lunar lite is the system which involves having a softer density inner "core" encased in a firmer density outer "core". it's basically a 2 part cushioning system with the inner parts softer than the other foams.
-lunarlon, which I've never heard of, I'm guessing is a hybrid lunar foam/phylon cushioning system. Since the lunarfoam is softer I would assume it's the inner core while the firmer phylon is the outer core.
Originally Posted by scshift
From what I know:
-lunar foam is the actual material that was developed with NASA, it's the one in the Hyperdunk and Kobe IV that breaks down easily.
-lunar lite is the system which involves having a softer density inner "core" encased in a firmer density outer "core". it's basically a 2 part cushioning system with the inner parts softer than the other foams.
-lunarlon, which I've never heard of, I'm guessing is a hybrid lunar foam/phylon cushioning system. Since the lunarfoam is softer I would assume it's the inner core while the firmer phylon is the outer core.
Originally Posted by Mister Friendly
I wonder if Nike has revamped the Lunar formula even more because it seems like in 2012 they are really pushing Lunar
Originally Posted by Mister Friendly
I wonder if Nike has revamped the Lunar formula even more because it seems like in 2012 they are really pushing Lunar