- Mar 14, 2010
- 35,467
- 48,439
If Niketalk curses the idea of Vince and TMAC getting a podcast what would they do with a @a-podcast?
![]()
Logo TOUGH though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Niketalk curses the idea of Vince and TMAC getting a podcast what would they do with a @a-podcast?
![]()
Well I’ll be, now that I went back to speak on the green part I realize what needed to be said was said in the REDIt would be hard to compare times like that because only the present has mass media to show us all the immoral stuff going on in micro levels. Please don't think all that wasn't happening because it wasn't written.
You wanted to say what you wanted to say so bad.LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO posting from the comfort of your air conditioned/centrally heated home/on your $1000 smart phone device using a wireless internet connection provided by a satellite or deep underground fiber optic cables to a SNEAKER BASED online forum asking if these are THE WORST TIMES EVER
get the **** outta here
go outside.
Other than the post toSo if you have such a relationship with god, why don’t you ask god for the answer? Genuinely curious. Surly the almighty can tell you?
This started out as a good question and more than reasonable observation. It ended like ****you think you can even assume what it thinks?Sounds kinda blasphemous but then again you wouldn’t be the first person to speak on behalf of a god.
It never hurts to check and verify if someone has sound reasoning or not even if they believe in god or any other questionable thing.Why waste the thoughts on that question and you don’t even believe in GOD?
Of course not. Why do you need anybody to be concerned for you over supposed hypotheticals?It’s not out of concern for me that’s for sure.
That was a check up on my reasoning?It never hurts to check and verify if someone has sound reasoning or not even if they believe in god or any other questionable thing.
Of course not. Why do you need anybody to be concerned for you over supposed hypotheticals?
A while ago l said that certain topics should have zoom meetings; if moderated properly l think it would go well.you need a podcast, but NT ain't ready for that.
Was the statement not clear enough? Don’t get me wrong no answer is an answer in itselfif
That was a check up on my reasoning?
Okay.
I answered the question and you asked a silly question in order to reply.I asked you a reasonable question and eliminated concern as a possible answer.
Cuz the notion of concern is ridiculous especially given my initial statement. It was like you purposely were trying to add more words to your reply despite not saying much at all.I don’t know why you responded to that question with your answer and then accused me of being the one in need.
you'll need to screen for people who would want to be involved.A while ago l said that certain topics should have zoom meetings; if moderated properly l think it would go well.
Doubtful given the lack of sound reasoning that motivated this thread
Or you. Could be you.But perhaps other posters will provide something stimulating.
Nothing about what’s been posted is giving me any motivation or inspiration to actively participate so that’s unlikely.Or you. Could be you.
You are actively participating.Nothing about what’s been posted is giving me any motivation or inspiration to actively participate so that’s unlikely.
Active participation with the thread topic. I thought that would be obvious or at least easy to interpretYou are actively participating.
No i'd rather move on.Active participation with the thread topic. I thought that would be obvious or at least easy to interpret
The rest of my posts have been replies to you which have been about my post and how it was posted instead of the actual content of it or the thread topic. No need to be dense.
But if you’d rather a thread derail that’s fine.
So it’s exactly like I said earlierNo i'd rather move on.
Can wee movee on, I'd rather not thread derail either.
I waved the flag, Im asking if we can move on.
I will.
Yes.So it’s exactly like I said earlier
the new godthe new "drug" chatgpt.
You list just about everything except wickedness, debauchery, moral decaya-friend
I still don't understand how any rational person could come to the conclusion that today's society is even remotely comparable to the past by any stretch of the imagination.
Whether it's living standards, life expectancy, crime, war, famine, scientific advances, religion, ... literally every single metric was infinitely worse in the past.
Also, you speak of "in the eyes of God, not man" but what about those of us who don't believe in any type of organized religion and think it's all nonsense?
PREAMBLE:
This isn’t a comparison about comfort of life now compared to comfort of life then/when.
This is a comparison of wickedness, debauchery, moral decay.
Regarding wickedness and moral decay, absolutely yes. I think debauchery is probably worse today (prevalence of degenerate porn consumption/addiction etc) but that’s about it.Belgium
Twice now you've mentioned not believing in GOD.
I didn't respond out of respect to you, your beliefs.
For the same reason I wouldn't ask Syropha(my blind cousin) if my hair looks better long/short, I wouldn't ask you what you thought if I knew you didn't believe in GOD,and since you told me what you thought I gave you the respect of moving on.
I don't want to convince you GOD is real.
In regard to this one, I could be wrong but I'm also not claiming I am right, simply voicing an opinion.
Often my opinions are ****, often I am wrong and OFTEN on this board I've said some things I was clearly wrong about or at fault on and embarrassed about.
Never hid from them. When faced with the reality of being wrong I never hid, I showed my humility.
Same thing here, I'm not saying prove me wrong and I do with all mind believe I am right but I'm open to, discourse if you will.
I'm simply introducing my opinion(which could be ****)
All opinions welcome, doesn't mean a response is warranted.
Below you said something I did want to ask you about though
You list just about everything except wickedness, debauchery, moral decay
Not only do I understand why you would think no rational person would come to the conclusion in regard to living standards etc, with the exception of life expectancy and scientific advances, the rest of what you say is not comparable I agree with you on.
With most here it seems were are comparing, not the same things.
With that being said,
YOu said "literally every single metric was infinitely worse in the past'
Would you also encompass wickedness, debauchery and moral decay?