- 19,299
- 20,794
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
Griffin said that the media made the offer up and it was never on the tableCleveland passing on Afflalo #4 and #12 for the #1 though.
Jesus Christ, who's running that team?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Griffin said that the media made the offer up and it was never on the tableCleveland passing on Afflalo #4 and #12 for the #1 though.
Jesus Christ, who's running that team?
He would be an All-Star in Cleveland, which is in the East.
You cannot blame Chamberlain and Russell for their eras. They were still better defenders than Wallace. You'll give me Olajuwon? Yeah right at giving me him. Mutombo was a better defender than Wallace and I don't even need to get into that. I didn't list Rodman and he was a better defender than Wallace as well. No Kareem? You must be young.Who's better?
I'll wait.
Edit: Just saw your list.
As if Chamberlain and Russell had to guard dudes like Shaq.
Hakeem is the one I'll give you, Kareem, na.
I can think of 29 other teams too.With that Orlando lineup so heavily based on the defensive end they need a KD or Melo.
I can think of 29 other teams too.With that Orlando lineup so heavily based on the defensive end they need a KD or Melo.
I'm not getting into the debate, but rodman could legit defend 4 positions. Probably all 5 of them.
For you to say the legends were not better is stupid. Chamberlain and Russell were monsters on the defensive end.No Rodman was not better, I'm not blaming the legends for their era but to say they were better is stupid.
Ben Wallace was the best defender at the time when the league had the most talent, point blank.
Dikembe and Hakeem are the only relevant names you listed, you missed Duncan too.
Nowhere near? Nonsense. Wallace was a better shot blocker, that's a given. He was better on ball than against elite bigs than Wallace. Rodman was in the big menBen could as well, Rodman had nowhere near Wallace shot blocking and help defense ability. I wouldn't consider him better on ball against elite bigs either. Only thing he does better than Wallace is rebound.
To the people that said he cant shoot. He's on his way
Griffin said that the media made the offer up and it was never on the tableCleveland passing on Afflalo #4 and #12 for the #1 though.
Jesus Christ, who's running that team?
I'm not getting into the debate, but rodman could legit defend 4 positions. Probably all 5 of them.
Ben could as well, Rodman had nowhere near Wallace shot blocking and help defense ability. I wouldn't consider him better on ball against elite bigs either. Only thing he does better than Wallace is rebound.
You cannot blame Chamberlain and Russell for their eras. They were still better defenders than Wallace. You'll give me Olajuwon? Yeah right at giving me him. Mutombo was a better defender than Wallace and I don't even need to get into that. I didn't list Rodman and he was a better defender than Wallace as well. No Kareem? You must be young.
To the people that said he cant shoot. He's on his way
Yes you must be young. I know you are. Me? I'll be 34 in August. You? Yes there was more talent in the league during Rodman's era.You think there was more talent in the league during Rodman time then now? Ok convo done.
You keep saying I must be young, but that tells me you must be old, word to your s/n.
This is the draft thread anyway so I'm done trying to show you the light, keep that nostalgia alive pimp.
I'm not giving them love just because they're one of the best. Should you want to blame their era, you cannot blame them then. They put it down regardless.They played in the worst era talent wise in nba history, yes you can blame their era, you just giving russ & wilt the benefit of the doubt because theyre "all time greats"
Wallace was a 6'7 center controlling the paint on one of the best defensive teams of all time