48÷2(9+3) = ???

[klipschorn]

i have to screenshot this for future reference, 

Team 288.

 

[klipschorn]

i have to screenshot this for future reference, 

Team 288.

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.


288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.


288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by snakeyes17

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Show proof then. 

That's right. You can't because what I stated is a fact.

You distribute 48 instead of 2? Worst explanation for 288.

Again, you should remove yourself from this conversation if you're only posting 288 because Wolfram Alpha, Google and your calculator gave you 288.

You can't even comprehend what has been said.
48 instead of 2? Uh, no.
Distribution is multiplying the inside times by the outside term. Why would you do that without performing division. You would distribute 24 to 9 and 24 to 3.
And on your paper? Why you throwing the 2(9+3) into the denominator? It isn't, or it would be (2(9+3)) or [2(9+3)].

Funny, you can get the same answer on paper, in a calculator, on Google, on Wolfram Alpha, and from credible sources.
Yet....where do you get 2 from? Improperly performing mathematical calculations? Making up rules? Restructuring the problem to your liking?
Using a website called myalgebra.com ?

You're like a parrot. All you do is say the same things over and over again without making any sense. 
Where did I get 2 from? It's in the original problem. Making up rules? No because I don't have to. Restructuring the problem to my liking? Blame your math teacher for not teaching you that math problems can be rearranged to make it easier to solve WITHOUT changing the answer. Using a website called myalgebra.com? Unlike you I don't need the Internet or a calculator to validate my answer to a SIMPLE Math problem. 

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by snakeyes17

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Show proof then. 

That's right. You can't because what I stated is a fact.

You distribute 48 instead of 2? Worst explanation for 288.

Again, you should remove yourself from this conversation if you're only posting 288 because Wolfram Alpha, Google and your calculator gave you 288.

You can't even comprehend what has been said.
48 instead of 2? Uh, no.
Distribution is multiplying the inside times by the outside term. Why would you do that without performing division. You would distribute 24 to 9 and 24 to 3.
And on your paper? Why you throwing the 2(9+3) into the denominator? It isn't, or it would be (2(9+3)) or [2(9+3)].

Funny, you can get the same answer on paper, in a calculator, on Google, on Wolfram Alpha, and from credible sources.
Yet....where do you get 2 from? Improperly performing mathematical calculations? Making up rules? Restructuring the problem to your liking?
Using a website called myalgebra.com ?

You're like a parrot. All you do is say the same things over and over again without making any sense. 
Where did I get 2 from? It's in the original problem. Making up rules? No because I don't have to. Restructuring the problem to my liking? Blame your math teacher for not teaching you that math problems can be rearranged to make it easier to solve WITHOUT changing the answer. Using a website called myalgebra.com? Unlike you I don't need the Internet or a calculator to validate my answer to a SIMPLE Math problem. 

 

[crystal springs]

If this thread reaches 288 pages, Team 288 should win by default.

 

[crystal springs]

If this thread reaches 288 pages, Team 288 should win by default.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

 

[marcuskicks]

usainboltisfast wrote:

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

 

[marcuskicks]

usainboltisfast wrote:

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

 

[klipschorn]

 

[klipschorn]

 

[unkletomcruze]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.

Equation reads:

[h3]48 ÷ 2 x (9+3)[/h3]
That then becomes...


[h3]48 ÷ 2 x 12[/h3]

It's that simple.

The only way to arrive at a conclusive answer of two is if the original equation were written as:

[h3]48 ÷ (2 x (9+3))[/h3]Because the above equation is specifically telling you that you cannot proceed, definitively, until you multiply the 2 by the product of 9 + 3.

Krux I specifically asked you this question back around the 50+ pages, and you conveniently disregarded it (

), but I'll ask you again.

What's the mathematical difference between writing a (12) and 12? Is the bracketed 12 inherently different from the non-bracketed 12?



...
 

 

[unkletomcruze]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.

Equation reads:

[h3]48 ÷ 2 x (9+3)[/h3]
That then becomes...


[h3]48 ÷ 2 x 12[/h3]

It's that simple.

The only way to arrive at a conclusive answer of two is if the original equation were written as:

[h3]48 ÷ (2 x (9+3))[/h3]Because the above equation is specifically telling you that you cannot proceed, definitively, until you multiply the 2 by the product of 9 + 3.

Krux I specifically asked you this question back around the 50+ pages, and you conveniently disregarded it (

), but I'll ask you again.

What's the mathematical difference between writing a (12) and 12? Is the bracketed 12 inherently different from the non-bracketed 12?



...
 

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Numerator    = Dividend

Denominator = Divisor

 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.

Equation reads:

[h3]48 ÷ 2 x (9+3)[/h3]
That then becomes...


[h3]48 ÷ 2 x 12[/h3]

It's that simple.

The only way to arrive at a conclusive answer of two is if the original equation were written as:

[h3]48 ÷ (2 x (9+3))[/h3]Because the above equation is specifically telling you that you cannot proceed, definitively, until you multiply the 2 by the product of 9 + 3.

Krux I specifically asked you this question back around the 50+ pages, and you conveniently disregarded it (

), but I'll ask you again.

What's the mathematical difference between writing a (12) and 12? Is the bracketed 12 inherently different from the non-bracketed 12?



...
 

Are you telling me the note I posted is wrong?

I continue to ignore you because the original problem is NOT 48÷2*12.  

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.

Equation reads:

[h3]48 ÷ 2 x (9+3)[/h3]
That then becomes...


[h3]48 ÷ 2 x 12[/h3]

It's that simple.

The only way to arrive at a conclusive answer of two is if the original equation were written as:

[h3]48 ÷ (2 x (9+3))[/h3]Because the above equation is specifically telling you that you cannot proceed, definitively, until you multiply the 2 by the product of 9 + 3.

Krux I specifically asked you this question back around the 50+ pages, and you conveniently disregarded it (

), but I'll ask you again.

What's the mathematical difference between writing a (12) and 12? Is the bracketed 12 inherently different from the non-bracketed 12?



...
 

Are you telling me the note I posted is wrong?

I continue to ignore you because the original problem is NOT 48÷2*12.  

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by seasoned vet



 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by seasoned vet



 
 
.....DAMB. this plus the fact that usainboltisfast has been the LOUDEST 288 guy in here for pages says alot.
 
 
 

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by Klipschorn

This right here shows how people like you are so damn dependent on technology. You could've easily typed that directly OR write it using a pen but noooooooooooo YOU PRINTED THE PROBLEM, SNAPPED A PHOTO THEN UPLOADED IT.

Just to answer your question, YES THEY'RE THE SAME.

But I bet your calculator, Wolfram Alpha and Google say differently. 

Try using your brain for once to solve a SIMPLE math problem. 

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by Klipschorn

This right here shows how people like you are so damn dependent on technology. You could've easily typed that directly OR write it using a pen but noooooooooooo YOU PRINTED THE PROBLEM, SNAPPED A PHOTO THEN UPLOADED IT.

Just to answer your question, YES THEY'RE THE SAME.

But I bet your calculator, Wolfram Alpha and Google say differently. 

Try using your brain for once to solve a SIMPLE math problem. 

 

[joe billionaire]

yall still on this?