- 531
- 1,253
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
https://www.footlocker.ca/en/product/~/4101351.html RESTOCK FOOT CANADA
Air Jordan 11 Low IE OG black red
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by hitman243,
- Start date
- 1,489
- 721
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2003
The restock I finally see on time is Canada only smh
da r entertainment
Supporter
- 9,781
- 3,608
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
JD pair shipped, can't wait to get these in hand tomorrow!!
- 4,346
- 12,964
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
- 3,780
- 4,114
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2013
If i only i could add my size.
- 3,780
- 4,114
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2013
Bots ate em up as usual.
- 17,303
- 26,736
- Joined
- May 11, 2017
- 224
- 485
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2016
Been a while since I had these the right way, sort of…
they got the box right, not the label though…
they got the box right, not the label though…
- 10,507
- 18,671
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
Damn if these don’t hit me the same way the OG’s did when my mom surprised me with that pair…Going to need another pair…What the hell took JB so long to give us this shoe? I mean seriously…
- 1,489
- 721
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2003
Getting closer it seems but still so far away
- 10,507
- 18,671
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
It’ll never be exact…These close enough…Too old to try and hold out for a pair that’s 1 for 1…Besides, who’s to say they don’t go back to the cement print joints for their 25th in 2028…
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- 6,532
- 12,778
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2002
Second Hibbett pair, although the first of the two orders, has shipped!Update, the second of the two orders has shipped, nothing yet on the first
- 2,592
- 1,211
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
SNKRS pair came in and I must say, should’ve .5 size down cause these feels long on feet
- 11,974
- 3,257
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
SNKRS pair came in and I must say, should’ve .5 size down cause these feels long on feet
Haven’t tried mine on yet, hopefully my normal size is okay.
- 224
- 485
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2016
I ordered TTS and .5 down and the smaller fits better. Sending the TTS back, unless anyone wants it, 1.1.5 is the TTS.SNKRS pair came in and I must say, should’ve .5 size down cause these feels long on feet
- 1,489
- 721
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2003
So close. I need that size 11 you’re keeping lol.
- 224
- 485
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2016
Sent you a DM
I didn't forget about you. Size 11? Possible wednesday or Friday. Only issue is your not my size. If I get a 12 or 11.5 I'll offer them up here.
I am a little greedy and secured my double up first.
- 1,489
- 721
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2003
Na as you should, I was just picking fun. Definitely would be appreciated, and like I said any and all efforts have already been greatly appreciated. Lmk I’ll be impatiently waiting lol.
- 609
- 1,120
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
Anybody need a size 10 DM me, retail plus shipping.
- 18,245
- 10,708
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2016
move on unless they restock somewhere
i mean i would have lost out to the bots but literally hours after i mention it 
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,389
- 47,932
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
That color combo is mean after not being able to have a pair for so long. I was confused when the 2003 retro dropped and almost passed They are still missing the gradient patterns on the netted upper. Small thing but a big detail to me for retros.
They are still missing the gradient patterns on the netted upper. Small thing but a big detail to me for retros. 
- 357
- 1,268
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
Got mine today, I am stoked! It was about time they got retroed properly.
Compared them with my 1996 OG's and I was pretty pleased to say the least. On my pair the craftsmaship is flawless, CF texture is just like the originals, the smoked gray transluscent outsole is the right shade or at least real close to how I remember them when new back then, everything is close enough even if not 100% identical. I genuinely think they did a great job with these and I wonder if many of the people that are critical ever had a 1996 pair on hand to compare with sometimes.
So for those that really wanna know, here's are the minor differences I've found when comparing them side to side with my used 1996 OG's:
-the foam inside the tongue is a little thinner and red the liner is not as flush with the top of the tongue i.e more tucked in on the 2021, but that could be due to the fact mine have been worn.
-the red liner is a shade lighter to expert eyes only
-the 1996 are flat on the side panel where there is the leather and the sewing lines whereas the 2021 are ribbed a little bit. On the toe cap it's the opposite! (that could be different from pair to pair,IDK?) I like the 1996 toe better.
-as for the shape: can't comment since the 1996 are now used and back then nobody was noticing, comparing and talking toe shape! But I admit some retros have gone noticeably way too fat in the toe area recent years.
-as for the leather appearance or quality, no complaints at all here and I think we should be careful before drawing any general conclusions on appereance as there seem to be more variations from pair to pair these days. To be fair: mine seem pretty much on point but back in the days, materials seemed to be a bit more consistent from one pair to another, and even the it depends on the year and where they were made.
-the netting's knitting is similar but not identical.
-the laces on the new ones are a little stiffer; that could be due to either different knitting or the fact that the older ones are used, to me no big deal there.
-the jumpman has no buttcrack(which is a plus IMO)
-the geometrical shape of the carbon fiber bits is a tiny bit less rounded than the 1996, but better than most I can think of on top of my head and the texture is on point as mentionned earlier.
Seriously, unless I've missed something too obvious to see because I'm writing this at 2 AM, you have to inspect the shoes extra closely from less than 6 inch away to notice any of these differences. On feet no one would be able to tell. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention about the dimples like on all newer 11 models! So to each their own and I respect that, but these minute production differences are to be expected in my view and should not be major deal breakers, at least for this edition.
What I like less a bit is the price, but at least they did a great job with them as far as I can see.
The thing this shoe doesn't get enough credit for is how amazing the low top version is and performs just as well compared to any of the best current models. It feels super light but stable, durable, super breatheable, cushionning is great, traction is great and the cf plate is super sprigny. One of my all-time fav game shoe to this day and I genuinely feel like this shoe enhances your on court experience noticeably.
Got another pair comin'! Lets see if it's the same story or not with those when they get here...
Compared them with my 1996 OG's and I was pretty pleased to say the least. On my pair the craftsmaship is flawless, CF texture is just like the originals, the smoked gray transluscent outsole is the right shade or at least real close to how I remember them when new back then, everything is close enough even if not 100% identical. I genuinely think they did a great job with these and I wonder if many of the people that are critical ever had a 1996 pair on hand to compare with sometimes.
So for those that really wanna know, here's are the minor differences I've found when comparing them side to side with my used 1996 OG's:
-the foam inside the tongue is a little thinner and red the liner is not as flush with the top of the tongue i.e more tucked in on the 2021, but that could be due to the fact mine have been worn.
-the red liner is a shade lighter to expert eyes only
-the 1996 are flat on the side panel where there is the leather and the sewing lines whereas the 2021 are ribbed a little bit. On the toe cap it's the opposite! (that could be different from pair to pair,IDK?) I like the 1996 toe better.
-as for the shape: can't comment since the 1996 are now used and back then nobody was noticing, comparing and talking toe shape! But I admit some retros have gone noticeably way too fat in the toe area recent years.
-as for the leather appearance or quality, no complaints at all here and I think we should be careful before drawing any general conclusions on appereance as there seem to be more variations from pair to pair these days. To be fair: mine seem pretty much on point but back in the days, materials seemed to be a bit more consistent from one pair to another, and even the it depends on the year and where they were made.
-the netting's knitting is similar but not identical.
-the laces on the new ones are a little stiffer; that could be due to either different knitting or the fact that the older ones are used, to me no big deal there.
-the jumpman has no buttcrack(which is a plus IMO)
-the geometrical shape of the carbon fiber bits is a tiny bit less rounded than the 1996, but better than most I can think of on top of my head and the texture is on point as mentionned earlier.
Seriously, unless I've missed something too obvious to see because I'm writing this at 2 AM, you have to inspect the shoes extra closely from less than 6 inch away to notice any of these differences. On feet no one would be able to tell. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention about the dimples like on all newer 11 models! So to each their own and I respect that, but these minute production differences are to be expected in my view and should not be major deal breakers, at least for this edition.
What I like less a bit is the price, but at least they did a great job with them as far as I can see.
The thing this shoe doesn't get enough credit for is how amazing the low top version is and performs just as well compared to any of the best current models. It feels super light but stable, durable, super breatheable, cushionning is great, traction is great and the cf plate is super sprigny. One of my all-time fav game shoe to this day and I genuinely feel like this shoe enhances your on court experience noticeably.
Got another pair comin'! Lets see if it's the same story or not with those when they get here...
Last edited:
- 2,164
- 1,065
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Just checked my Hibbett order and it still says “in process” with an estimated delivery of Sept. 21. Pretty confident I’m not getting them on the 21st. 
Similar threads
