Air Jordan IV “Black/Cement” - May 4th 2019

[anwagbo3000]

https://solecollector.com/news/2019...summit-white-fire-red-308497-060-release-date

 

[anwagbo3000]

In for 2

 

[SNEAKEATER_619]

SNKRS early drop copped

 

[GrizzlyAnimal]

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Best shape we’ve gotten in years. Still not 99, but it doesn’t look like 08 either. Was in either way

 

[SNEAKEATER_619]

 

[chrisftdot]

I didn't have the OGs but is the suede suppose to look like that?

 

[Deleted member 42060]

They should raise the heel height. How many times that backtab digs into a person's heel while walking. No low cut socks, mid or highs would be needed cause of that.

 

[RustyShackleford]

I didn't have the OGs but is the suede suppose to look like that?

No

They are suppose to have durabuck that shows the grey outlines of the panels.

 

[colosneakerado]

Sex.

How do we get these pics 3 months in advance but only got the infrared 6s pics a few weeks from release?

 

[playaproved]

Toe box looks way better on these early pairs than the 2016 White/Cements.

 

[willy156]

14 pair minimum

 

[evansst]

These still aren’t right to me smh.

 

[scoop0625]

Need the outlines like the OG, '99 & CDP pairs.

 

[nephi215]

Damn. These UA pairs look like nubuck. They look dusty already. Still going to cop though lol.

 

[RustyShackleford]

These still aren’t right to me smh.

Need the outlines like the OG, '99 & CDP pairs.

Damn. These UA pairs look like nubuck. They look dusty already. Still going to cop though lol.

 

[xmigzx]

In. My 2012's are beat.

 

[bestintheworld]

In. My 2012's are beat.

Same. My everyday beaters, can’t wait for a fresh pair to have sitting in the closet for who knows how long before I even get a chance to wear it

 

[suchafraud23]

Definitely not nubuck

Looks like what’s on the 6s

Don’t really need any grey lines over here

They’re decent

 

[HellRazor1978]

They look like durabuck which is good but still not sure about the height. They look taller than recent 4’s but still not as high cut as the 99’s. I’m in for a pair but I’ll need to see pics as we get closer to release day before I decide to double up.

 

[pwguy]

I like these. But the toe box looks like all recent 4s to me; no sign of a slant like they were able to do on the flight '89 retros. Oh well.

 

[Sole4realex]

By looking at the pics reminds me of the CDP IV's. Still have my pair. As always I will see on release date.

 

[airdhazzal]

 

[doublemesh96]

Toe box looks way better on these early pairs than the 2016 White/Cements.

I hope you’re right but it’s hard to tell. I’m hoping this is the same situation as the concords where the UA pics look beat and the real deal is on point.
Also feel like there should be a bit more spacing between the midsole above the air unit and the stitching under the plastic wing. Maybe has something to do with the height of the shoe. But at first glance you’re definitely not like “that’s them”. As others have said something is off.

In. My 2012's are, have been and always will be trash.

 

[drew]

One of the very few sneaker cops for me this year, personally.



-Drew