U
User 15002
Guest
Faking an injury is a dirty play to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Cyprus Sinner II:
How do y'all know he didn't knock the wind out of him?
A hard elbow to the rib cage is not something that most people just brush off, plus it had the added momentum of Bowen running into him.
It wasn't a dirty play to the onlooker but if you were the one taking that elbow you might have a different opinion, especially taking it from someone with the history of Bowen.
No one on this board would've just brushed that off, and you would've probably wanted to say something to Bowen too, like Amare did.
But instead what y'all get from that is Amare is soft and baiting the refs for bending over after taking a serious elbow to the ribs, possibly getting his wind knocked out of him, and possibly getting kneed in the balls. Then when he walks over and actually says something to Bowen, that just makes him look softer because he wasn't stupid enough to actually try to fight Bowen.
This is why I don't take 90% of the people on here seriously.
Already been covered.But then we he hit the Suns bench, my man was top notch, talking abut plays with Nash.
If STAT were on another team, the PG would have been like 'Why are you talking about plays? You alright, my man? For a second, I thought maybe you were dying.'
But STAT's not on another team; he's on the Suns, so Steve was probably thinking 'Enh, I know he's fine. This is what we do, feign injury, try to bait the refs into a call, then come back to the sidelines to discuss our next offensive play, our next defensive rotation, and our next attempt at baiting.'
Originally Posted by soychulo
Faking an injury is a dirty play to me.
Originally Posted by Cyprus Sinner II
Maybe he just took a hard hit to the ribs and his wind wasn't knocked out.
Maybe he just took a medium hit to the ribs.
Maybe he just got a little wind knocked out of him and it wasn't that severe.
Maybe he just got kneed slightly in the groin.
All possible scenarios in which his reaction is perfectly normal.
No one really knows if he was acting or not, but for people to come in here talking about him being soft or saying with full confidence that he was definitely baiting the refs because his reaction is abnormal for what happened is ridiculous.
Originally Posted by Jdiddy931
he got hit in the testicals.. Its obvious cuz after he got up he started grabbing them to see if they were still there.. you guys would say anything to hate on the Suns.
Originally Posted by grittyman20
If you are soft, Bowen will find who you are and expose you ....(Vince, Ray Allen, Nash, etc)
Add Amare to that list of Charmin All-stars
Bowen = dirty?
Hold up, someone still thinks otherwise? Even after all the pictures and animated gifs of him kicking people in the face onmultiple occasions and complaints from just about every NBA star about his dirty play?
Bowen = Dirty, end of discussion. No, not a "tough defender", or something like that that puts a positive spin on him being dirty, but he is a DIRTYdefender and a dirty player, nothing short.
Cyprus Sinner II:
My problem is when people come across so confidently like Amare's just soft, or it's not possible for him to have actually been hurt for a second.
And my problem is when people try to hard too hard to paint me in a negative light.
Where did I say that there is no way Amare was hurt? Look, my opinion was that he was feigning injury. Just because continue to argue that means that I thinkthere is absolutely NO WAY he was legitimately hurt?
That's quite the immature conclusion to draw of someone; "Well you didn't SAY that he could have possibly been hurt, so I can't stand thatyou're acting like there was no way he was possibly hurt."
It's possible that he could have been hurt.
There.
It's entirely possible.
It is COMPLETELY possible that he got slammed hard in either his midsection or his groin, and the reason he was acting at in the Suns bench was because he wasjust sucking it up.
@ someone needing to read that in order for them to feel comfortable with me acknowledging that my opinion could be wrong
It's like, to make some of you happy, I have to give my opinion now, AND make sure that I acknowledge... EXPLICITLY... that the opposite of my opinioncould be COMPLETELY true.
"I think Ron Artest is a loose cannon. I think he just a time bomb ticking towards another Malice at the Palace incident.
HOWEVER, I it is entirely possible that Ron Artest is one of the most sane people in sports. I could be completely wrong about him being a loose cannon.*"
WHERE did I say that I think there is NO POSSIBLE WAY Amare was genuinely hurt?
NOWHERE.
YOU WON'T FIND IT.
I simply argued my opinion, which was that he was feigning. You did the same thing (argue your opinion); it's just that your opinion was that he wasgenuinely hurt. Just because you may have said 'It's possible he was faking' doesn't mean that you believe the opposite of your opinion couldbe true any more than I believe the opposite of my opinion could be true. Just because you may have said that you could be wrong does NOT mean that you'reacting less confident than I am about being right.
You presumed that I thought I was completely confident in my opinion because I never said 'Sure, he could have been hurt,' and that's your fault.
* Incidentally, Artest is one of my favorite players in the league. I love the way he plays.