- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
Disgusting people thought up this commercial. I will never buy their brand after this.
Banned Durex Condom Super Bowl Commercial... VOL. DARK and DISTURBING
Pathos
formerly retrosan
- 4,761
- 52
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2010
yeah, having a son like that because you didn't wear a condom is highly improbable
- 3,023
- 123
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
thats a little extreme. they killed a cat though
- 1,509
- 138
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
this commercial was never intended for the Super Bowl. It wouldve cost abt 10million to air during the game. Make a crazy commercial, release it virally and put "banned super bowl commercial" on it and watch it spread over tha interwebz. seems to be mission accomplished. and they may have a point w/ that commercial, freakonomics featured a study that said that the decline in violent crime is possibly linked to the rise in birth control/contraceptive use starting in the 70s.
- 12,703
- 71
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2004
i just dont want kids because they are annoying as hell.
was never thinking of the public's safety.
was never thinking of the public's safety.
- 6,385
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2004
Violent commercial
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
this always gets me
- 6,598
- 309
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
- 4,096
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2004
If we didn't have the crazy people how would we know what good people are?
- 157,068
- 136,888
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Vince has done worse
- 23,359
- 5,996
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
Some truth... maybe?
- 7,840
- 1,721
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2008
Wow
- 20,039
- 9,766
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
The ad is completely misguided by the fact they showed the mother dying during child birth. The odds of the father bailing are FAR greater than the mother dying giving birth. That's how the monsters are created, not by the mom dying in labor.
- 106,718
- 78,540
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2011
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Vince has done worse
- 20,039
- 9,766
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Also this. It's not a "banned" Super Bowl commercial. They released it on the Internets, then slapped the word "banned" on it to drum up interest. This would never air on network TV under any circumstance, let alone the most watched program in TV history.
- 27,294
- 15,000
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2011
Someone actually tried to get this on television??
darthska
Staff member
- 44,550
- 28,172
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Could you imagine if this actually aired during the Super Bowl?
Would be a lot of living rooms filled with awkward silences right after the commercial.
Dudes looking around at each other like "What the $%*!?"
And then the next commercial is some damn polar bears sharing a Coke.
And then the next commercial is some damn polar bears sharing a Coke.
- 20,039
- 9,766
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
It was never intended for TV.Originally Posted by PRIME
Someone actually tried to get this on television??
- 6,564
- 647
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
- 8,351
- 859
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2006
*cue Alonzo Mourning GIF* Makes sense, but
at the same time.
- 6,617
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
meh, not that original.
- 598
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
Latarian Milton shoulda made a cameo
- 17,152
- 8,108
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2008
You have Lifestyle condoms in the US? WORST.
- 11,427
- 1,968
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
idk i once went thru 12 durex in 1 smash, had to try em all before i stopped
- 2,330
- 18
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Vince has done worse