- 37,685
- 51,746
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
ehhh not really unless your famous.Yes, yambs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ehhh not really unless your famous.Yes, yambs
No they're just like Sand People from Star Wars...they trap what they want.We are Jedi knights when it comes to fat white chicks.
that sand gets mighty wet thoWe are Jedi knights when it comes to fat white chicks.
No they're just like Sand People from Star...they trap what they want.
They be waiting in the cut like...that sand gets mighty wet tho
They be waiting in the cut like...
They be waiting in the cut like...
College admissions
That was just the UC system, race-blind admissions universities are definitely in the minority. Otherwise basically all the schools here would be majority Asian based on scores.Not true. Go to a Californian college. They got rid of affirmitive action. The results are that there is a **** ton of asians and all of a sudden white people disappeared. Affirmative action was helping with people to the detriment of asians this whole time. White women were the group that benefited from affirmative action the mostCollege admissions
That was just the UC system, race-blind admissions universities are definitely in the minority. Otherwise basically all the schools here would be majority Asian based on scores.
I agree, I think any sort of modified admissions system should use economic classes as divisors instead of race. It is far more concrete to classify a person based on their wealth as compared to any potential race ambiguity, and wealth is the #1 factor in one's upbringing/environment, and subsequently a foundation for what they do later on.
^^^Thanks. I don't really like to look at affirmative action as an advantage cause its supposed to counteract years of advantages white and Asian students have been afforded. In reality this isn't always the case. A lot of black students at elite undergrad and graduate schools came from pretty stable households financially. In an attempt to establish racial diversity, sometime economic diversity gets lost in the equation. It's not a perfect system, but it'll have to do for now.
Here are some numbers:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/24/us/affirmative-action-bans.html (note on this one doesn't even include the Asian statistics)
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-adv-asian-race-tutoring-20150222-story.html
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebat...statistics-indicate-an-ivy-league-asian-quota
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/11/affirmative-action
Here is the information LIONBLOOD was talking about, in regards to medical school admissions:
https://www.aei.org/publication/acc...-affirmative-discrimination-blacks-hispanics/
Being Asian is by far the worst demographic to be in America in terms of academia. They are not well portrayed here and are far less socially integrated than other races, so schools with a certain prestige or reputation to uphold that isn't solely derived from technical ability (such as MIT, CMU, Caltech) are able to use "holistic" selection processes to use subjective criteria to lower the amount of Asians admitted.
This is for undergraduate admissions. The numbers show a different story for graduate studies, where your "overall balance" isn't as important as your skill and passion in your field of study (and is subsequently easier to objectively quantify), which is why you see a significantly higher percentage of Asians at the graduate level, even at schools like the Ivy League where they are not as well-received in undergraduate admissions.
To paraphrase Chris Rock, I'll trade being able to say n**** for being able to set interest rates.
...