- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
Son what?
a naive apolitical assessment being taken and politicized by a environment he ironically agreed with in principle but challenged da means.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Son what?
dont got the time to read it, cuzzo semi right, hes playing dumb to a certain extent tho, but it kinda remind me of that pic of some start up that posted their boardroom that was 100% white women with the caption that bragged diversity, dummys just as bad as their "oppressors" stupid mfs
He had his right to free speech, Google had their right to fire him for using their company and mailing list as a vehicle to promote his beliefs.
probably is a youtube commenter
diversity is fixed in relation to dominant society
nah, you're overplaying da political hand cuz certain folks of a partisan ilk is rollin with it.
da reality is da rubber of meritocracy is meeting da road of reality where things "on paper work" in real life are much more nuanced, I.E. emotions & passions, and flat out zeal of something tends to get blown way out of proportion.
you can tell this guy only knows how to crunch data and come to callused scientific conclusions, which on da tech world is just what da doctor ordered.
that manifest was cited like a dissertation.
this is why Robots won't ever really take over jobs humans do where da human element cannot be factored out.
da irony is biological men & women are different and to politicize it is just giving lip service of w/e da overarching topic is just to not offend and move on.
https://www.perspectiveapi.com
Google is investing in Artificial intelligence. Maybe they'll deem open thought offensive or "toxic"
Of course OP would have an issue with gender equality
i literally just copy & pasted a article, try again.
Nah, your thread title says otherwise. Don't try to be clever, because you don't have the capacity to do so
Using someone’s biological sex to essentialize an entire group of people’s personality is like surgically operating with an axe. Not precise enough to do much good, probably will cause a lot of harm.
There have been (and likely will continue to be) many socio-structural barriers to women working in technological jobs. These include culturally-embedded gender stereotypes, biased socialization practices, in some cultures explicit employment discrimination, and a certain degree of masculinization of technological workplaces. Within this sea of gender bias, should Google use various practices (affirmative action is not just one thing) to especially encourage capable women of joining (and enjoying) the Google workplace? I vote yes.
It's difficult to make the case that you have no bias on this issue when you're posting sexist "jokes" on the same page. Consider yourself warned, by the way.ever had a argument with a broad? exactly....
It's 10 pages long and has 11 citations. Where does that qualify as a dissertation? Trump University?that manifest was cited like a dissertation.
It's 10 pages long and has 11 citations. Where does that qualify as a dissertation? Trump University?
It's difficult to make the case that you have no bias on this issue when you're posting sexist "jokes" on the same page
A stronger connection between these areas in men suggests they have a more analytical than emotional approach when dealing with negative emotions,” said Stéphane Potvin, associate professor at the University of Montreal’s Department of Psychiatry. “It is possible that women tend to focus more on the feelings generated by these stimuli, when men remain somewhat ‘passive’ toward negative emotions, trying to analyze the stimuli and their impact.”
ethical/moral concerns vs cold hard truths are always great combative opponents because you're dealing with rooted facts vs emotional feelings of people which isn't always connected to what's really going on, but merely da perception.
hyperbole is an accepted form of writing b, relax.
It's difficult to make the case that you have no bias on this issue when you're posting sexist "jokes" on the same page. Consider yourself warned, by the way.
id really like to get meth's response to thiswho's talking jokes? this been established that women are emotional argumentive creatures.
A stronger connection between these areas in men suggests they have a more analytical than emotional approach when dealing with negative emotions,” said Stéphane Potvin, associate professor at the University of Montreal’s Department of Psychiatry. “It is possible that women tend to focus more on the feelings generated by these stimuli, when men remain somewhat ‘passive’ toward negative emotions, trying to analyze the stimuli and their impact.”
http://www.medicaldaily.com/study-w...gative-emotions-react-differently-mens-354226
jokes...i wish
hyperbole is an accepted form of writing b, relax.
who's talking jokes? this been established that women are emotional argumentive creatures.
http://www.medicaldaily.com/study-w...gative-emotions-react-differently-mens-354226
jokes...i wish
That study was only 46 people tho
And 25 women
And in Canada lol
That study was only 46 people tho
And 25 women
And in Canada lol
I'm not saying it is not plausible that women are more emotional than men or whatever..but im CERTAIN there ARE men out there who are more emotionally argumentive than some women.
Our president for example.
you implying Canada is a on another planet or something? and surveys & studies always use a small sample size and scale it up reflect a large population on question (Red skins poll demonstrated this)