- 836
- 13
ANYBODY THAT IS ASKING BASIC QUESTIONING OF GOD/CHRISTIANITY PLEASE GO TO THIS THREAD INSTEAD, THE MAJORITY OF THE QUESTIONS ASKED HERE HAVE BEEN ANSWERED HERE: http://niketalk.com/topic/255220?page=1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by roc4life24
other parts of bible are up for debate, but people long knew the earth was round. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth.
job 26 7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing
.isaiah chap 40 20
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The inconsistency proves that the book cannot be taken literally. It s a book that contradicts itself.
If the book simply included Adams first Wife, it'd be clear that this book was supposed to be nothing more than entertainment, especially for its time. During the time it was written, even years after it was passed down, not everyone could read it in the language it was written, or simply could not read at all. The book was interpreted to them, which brings about another more problems, then with people making comments like this,
____
PUSHA C[-]
Posted: 08/17/10 11:04 AM
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
What, has this "God" ever written down?
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by roc4life24
other parts of bible are up for debate, but people long knew the earth was round. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth.
job 26 7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing
.isaiah chap 40 20
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The inconsistency proves that the book cannot be taken literally. It s a book that contradicts itself.
If the book simply included Adams first Wife, it'd be clear that this book was supposed to be nothing more than entertainment, especially for its time. During the time it was written, even years after it was passed down, not everyone could read it in the language it was written, or simply could not read at all. The book was interpreted to them, which brings about another more problems, then with people making comments like this,
____
PUSHA C[-]
Posted: 08/17/10 11:04 AM
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
What, has this "God" ever written down?
The Right as against the Left brain.
The psycho-culture and educational foundation of Western Society exclusively develops and maintains the left hemisphere of the brain. (the intellectual,logical,articulate,concrete brain.) This is the brain that differentiates between things, separating wholes into parts analyzing and enabling us to deal with sequential phenomena.
The Left Brain (the primary and predominate brain used by the European group.) is segmented serial, linear, deductive and segregative and material tangible grounded.
On the side of the right hemisphere of the brain (the primary and predominate brain used by our African ancestors.) mediates spiritual, abstract, creative, aesthetic, artistic, athletic and rhythmic phenomena. This is the brain that notes similarities between things and relates them to each other and the whole-thus unifying. Our right brain provides a mode of thinking that is synthetically, holistic, dynamic, congregative and metaphysical/ intangible grounded.
People are not in tune with their spirituality anymore SMH
The Right as against the Left brain.
The psycho-culture and educational foundation of Western Society exclusively develops and maintains the left hemisphere of the brain. (the intellectual,logical,articulate,concrete brain.) This is the brain that differentiates between things, separating wholes into parts analyzing and enabling us to deal with sequential phenomena.
The Left Brain (the primary and predominate brain used by the European group.) is segmented serial, linear, deductive and segregative and material tangible grounded.
On the side of the right hemisphere of the brain (the primary and predominate brain used by our African ancestors.) mediates spiritual, abstract, creative, aesthetic, artistic, athletic and rhythmic phenomena. This is the brain that notes similarities between things and relates them to each other and the whole-thus unifying. Our right brain provides a mode of thinking that is synthetically, holistic, dynamic, congregative and metaphysical/ intangible grounded.
People are not in tune with their spirituality anymore SMH
Originally Posted by OverGrinding
this thread is giving me a headache... why do u non believers feel the need to taught those who believe?
Originally Posted by OverGrinding
this thread is giving me a headache... why do u non believers feel the need to taught those who believe?
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
just as yall think is illogical/crazy/etc. to believe in God, I think the same of those who DON'T believe in a Creator
Does a Jehovahs Witness really want to debate this subject? I mean, really?????
Jehovahs Witness though
my fault you know it all so there's no debating with you. you just don't understand
true. religion =/= spirituality howeverOriginally Posted by south sole
The Right as against the Left brain.
The psycho-culture and educational foundation of Western Society exclusively develops and maintains the left hemisphere of the brain. (the intellectual,logical,articulate,concrete brain.) This is the brain that differentiates between things, separating wholes into parts analyzing and enabling us to deal with sequential phenomena.
The Left Brain (the primary and predominate brain used by the European group.) is segmented serial, linear, deductive and segregative and material tangible grounded.
On the side of the right hemisphere of the brain (the primary and predominate brain used by our African ancestors.) mediates spiritual, abstract, creative, aesthetic, artistic, athletic and rhythmic phenomena. This is the brain that notes similarities between things and relates them to each other and the whole-thus unifying. Our right brain provides a mode of thinking that is synthetically, holistic, dynamic, congregative and metaphysical/ intangible grounded.
People are not in tune with their spirituality anymore SMH
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
just as yall think is illogical/crazy/etc. to believe in God, I think the same of those who DON'T believe in a Creator
Does a Jehovahs Witness really want to debate this subject? I mean, really?????
Jehovahs Witness though
my fault you know it all so there's no debating with you. you just don't understand
true. religion =/= spirituality howeverOriginally Posted by south sole
The Right as against the Left brain.
The psycho-culture and educational foundation of Western Society exclusively develops and maintains the left hemisphere of the brain. (the intellectual,logical,articulate,concrete brain.) This is the brain that differentiates between things, separating wholes into parts analyzing and enabling us to deal with sequential phenomena.
The Left Brain (the primary and predominate brain used by the European group.) is segmented serial, linear, deductive and segregative and material tangible grounded.
On the side of the right hemisphere of the brain (the primary and predominate brain used by our African ancestors.) mediates spiritual, abstract, creative, aesthetic, artistic, athletic and rhythmic phenomena. This is the brain that notes similarities between things and relates them to each other and the whole-thus unifying. Our right brain provides a mode of thinking that is synthetically, holistic, dynamic, congregative and metaphysical/ intangible grounded.
People are not in tune with their spirituality anymore SMH
Originally Posted by lobotomybeats
Yeah take it from a punch-drunk burger grill salesman.Originally Posted by FReSHtaDeFF03
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
A chance? In the form of what though? Is he simply going to ask you a question and all you have to do is say what he wants to hear? Is it THAT simple?Originally Posted by FReSHtaDeFF03
for your second question;Yes, if you don't believe, in Jesus Christ, you go to hell. simple as that. But if you never knew Christ, and you died, you would go to hell right? dang that sucks. but wait, i've done a lot of praying about this, and talked to my Pastor about this...
God created us. His love for us is truly unconditional. the GRACE of God is soooo amazing. He will never do you dirty like that homie. I believe and other bible scholars believe that if youre in this situation, when you die, God still gives you the chance to accept His Son Jesus Christ. He will share the good news with you Himself, and it's up to you to accept it. He's not just gonna hit the deny button on you. that would suck.
Also, how does your Pastor know this will happen? Has he spoken to anyone that is from a non-Christian based culture, that has died and came back to life? Is there any scripture supporting this theory?
YES my brother, it IS that simple. oh myyyyyyyy.. lol.
all He wants you to do is to accept Him as Lord and Savior. yup, that is all.
for the other part, see George Foreman.
Originally Posted by lobotomybeats
Yeah take it from a punch-drunk burger grill salesman.Originally Posted by FReSHtaDeFF03
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
A chance? In the form of what though? Is he simply going to ask you a question and all you have to do is say what he wants to hear? Is it THAT simple?Originally Posted by FReSHtaDeFF03
for your second question;Yes, if you don't believe, in Jesus Christ, you go to hell. simple as that. But if you never knew Christ, and you died, you would go to hell right? dang that sucks. but wait, i've done a lot of praying about this, and talked to my Pastor about this...
God created us. His love for us is truly unconditional. the GRACE of God is soooo amazing. He will never do you dirty like that homie. I believe and other bible scholars believe that if youre in this situation, when you die, God still gives you the chance to accept His Son Jesus Christ. He will share the good news with you Himself, and it's up to you to accept it. He's not just gonna hit the deny button on you. that would suck.
Also, how does your Pastor know this will happen? Has he spoken to anyone that is from a non-Christian based culture, that has died and came back to life? Is there any scripture supporting this theory?
YES my brother, it IS that simple. oh myyyyyyyy.. lol.
all He wants you to do is to accept Him as Lord and Savior. yup, that is all.
for the other part, see George Foreman.
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
just as yall think is illogical/crazy/etc. to believe in God, I think the same of those who DON'T believe in a Creator
Does a Jehovahs Witness really want to debate this subject? I mean, really?????
Jehovahs Witness though
my fault you know it all so there's no debating with you. you just don't understand
Oh I COMPLETELY understand! That is your problem! Check this out....
)
1664
Slavery introduced into law in Maryland, the law also prohibited marriage between white women and black men. This particular act remained in effect for over 300 years, and between 1935 and 1967 the law was extended to forbid the marriage of Malaysians with blacks or whites. The law was finally repealed in 1967. (Maryland State Archive, THE ARCHIVISTS' Record Series of the Week, Phebe Jacobsen "Colonial Marriage Records" Bulldog Vol. 2, No. 26 18 July 1988)
One characteristic which set American slavery apart was its racial basis. In America, with only a few early and insignificant exceptions, all slaves were Africans, and almost all Africans were slaves. This placed the label of inferiority on black skin and on African culture. In other societies, it had been possible for a slave who obtained his freedom to take his place in his society with relative ease. In America, however, when a slave became free, he was still obviously an African. The taint of inferiority clung to him. Not only did white America become convinced of white superiority and black inferiority, but it strove to impose these racial beliefs on the Africans themselves. Slave masters gave a great deal of attention to the education and training of the ideal slave, In general, there were five steps in molding the character of such a slave: strict discipline, a sense of his own inferiority, belief in the master's superior power, acceptance of the master's standards, and, finally, a deep sense of his own helplessness and dependence. At every point this education was built on the belief in white superiority and black inferiority. Besides teaching the slave to despise his own history and culture, the master strove to inculcate his own value system into the African's outlook. The white man's belief in the African's inferiority paralleled African self hate. (Norman Coombs, The Immigrant Heritage of America, Twayne Press, 1972. CHAPTER 3, CHAPTER 3, The Shape of American Slavery).
The slave trade from Africa is said to have uprooted as many as 20 million people from their homes and brought them to the Americas. Slavery had existed as a human institution for centuries, but the slaves were usually captives taken in war or members of the lowest class in a society. The black African slave trade, by contrast, was a major economic enterprise. It made the traders rich and brought an abundant labor supply to the islands of the Caribbean and to the American Colonies. ()
1667/09 -ACT III.
An act declaring that “the baptisme of slaves doth not exempt them from bondage.[The passage of this statute indicates that Christianity was important to the concept of English identity. Legislators decided that slaves born in Virginia could not become free if they were baptized, but masters were encouraged to Christianize their enslaved laborers.] WHEREAS some doubts have risen whether children that are slaves by birth, and by the charity and piety of their owners made pertakers of the blessed sacrament of baptisme, should by vertue of their baptisme be made ffree; It is enacted and declared by this grand assembly, and the authority thereof, that the conferring of baptisme doth not alter the condition of the person as to his bondage or ffreedome; that diverse masters, ffreed from this doubt, may more carefully endeavour the propagation of christianity by permitting children, though slaves, or those of greater growth if capable to be admitted to that sacrament.
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
just as yall think is illogical/crazy/etc. to believe in God, I think the same of those who DON'T believe in a Creator
Does a Jehovahs Witness really want to debate this subject? I mean, really?????
Jehovahs Witness though
my fault you know it all so there's no debating with you. you just don't understand
Oh I COMPLETELY understand! That is your problem! Check this out....
)
1664
Slavery introduced into law in Maryland, the law also prohibited marriage between white women and black men. This particular act remained in effect for over 300 years, and between 1935 and 1967 the law was extended to forbid the marriage of Malaysians with blacks or whites. The law was finally repealed in 1967. (Maryland State Archive, THE ARCHIVISTS' Record Series of the Week, Phebe Jacobsen "Colonial Marriage Records" Bulldog Vol. 2, No. 26 18 July 1988)
One characteristic which set American slavery apart was its racial basis. In America, with only a few early and insignificant exceptions, all slaves were Africans, and almost all Africans were slaves. This placed the label of inferiority on black skin and on African culture. In other societies, it had been possible for a slave who obtained his freedom to take his place in his society with relative ease. In America, however, when a slave became free, he was still obviously an African. The taint of inferiority clung to him. Not only did white America become convinced of white superiority and black inferiority, but it strove to impose these racial beliefs on the Africans themselves. Slave masters gave a great deal of attention to the education and training of the ideal slave, In general, there were five steps in molding the character of such a slave: strict discipline, a sense of his own inferiority, belief in the master's superior power, acceptance of the master's standards, and, finally, a deep sense of his own helplessness and dependence. At every point this education was built on the belief in white superiority and black inferiority. Besides teaching the slave to despise his own history and culture, the master strove to inculcate his own value system into the African's outlook. The white man's belief in the African's inferiority paralleled African self hate. (Norman Coombs, The Immigrant Heritage of America, Twayne Press, 1972. CHAPTER 3, CHAPTER 3, The Shape of American Slavery).
The slave trade from Africa is said to have uprooted as many as 20 million people from their homes and brought them to the Americas. Slavery had existed as a human institution for centuries, but the slaves were usually captives taken in war or members of the lowest class in a society. The black African slave trade, by contrast, was a major economic enterprise. It made the traders rich and brought an abundant labor supply to the islands of the Caribbean and to the American Colonies. ()
1667/09 -ACT III.
An act declaring that “the baptisme of slaves doth not exempt them from bondage.[The passage of this statute indicates that Christianity was important to the concept of English identity. Legislators decided that slaves born in Virginia could not become free if they were baptized, but masters were encouraged to Christianize their enslaved laborers.] WHEREAS some doubts have risen whether children that are slaves by birth, and by the charity and piety of their owners made pertakers of the blessed sacrament of baptisme, should by vertue of their baptisme be made ffree; It is enacted and declared by this grand assembly, and the authority thereof, that the conferring of baptisme doth not alter the condition of the person as to his bondage or ffreedome; that diverse masters, ffreed from this doubt, may more carefully endeavour the propagation of christianity by permitting children, though slaves, or those of greater growth if capable to be admitted to that sacrament.
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by roc4life24
other parts of bible are up for debate, but people long knew the earth was round. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth.
job 26 7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing
.isaiah chap 40 20
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The inconsistency proves that the book cannot be taken literally. It s a book that contradicts itself.
If the book simply included Adams first Wife, it'd be clear that this book was supposed to be nothing more than entertainment, especially for its time. During the time it was written, even years after it was passed down, not everyone could read it in the language it was written, or simply could not read at all. The book was interpreted to them, which brings about another more problems, then with people making comments like this,
____
PUSHA C[-]
Posted: 08/17/10 11:04 AM
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
What, has this "God" ever written down?
God INSPIRED the Bible dog... you know NOTHING about religion/the Bible clearly so I don't even know why i'm still responding to you smh
Originally Posted by PUSHA C
Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by roc4life24
other parts of bible are up for debate, but people long knew the earth was round. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth.
job 26 7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing
.isaiah chap 40 20
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
The inconsistency proves that the book cannot be taken literally. It s a book that contradicts itself.
If the book simply included Adams first Wife, it'd be clear that this book was supposed to be nothing more than entertainment, especially for its time. During the time it was written, even years after it was passed down, not everyone could read it in the language it was written, or simply could not read at all. The book was interpreted to them, which brings about another more problems, then with people making comments like this,
____
PUSHA C[-]
Posted: 08/17/10 11:04 AM
Nat Turner you and many people are taking the Bible literal which, imo, is not how the Bible is meant to be taken. You are trying to make sense of something (God) that is beyond our realm of comprehension. He will show Himself to you one of these days.
What, has this "God" ever written down?
God INSPIRED the Bible dog... you know NOTHING about religion/the Bible clearly so I don't even know why i'm still responding to you smh