- Apr 14, 2004
- 12,703
- 71
plus it's a really crappy test and probably doesn't even test anything. hell, it doesn't even tell you how fast your processor is.
- Sep 17, 2005
- 10,916
- 3,923
an accurate measure would be with the Intel burn in test or LinX
See spoiler, I can get almost 52 gflops LinX and i think my last Intel run was 56
Spoiler [+]
- Sep 17, 2005
- 10,916
- 3,923
an accurate measure would be with the Intel burn in test or LinX
See spoiler, I can get almost 52 gflops LinX and i think my last Intel run was 56
Spoiler [+]
- Apr 14, 2004
- 12,703
- 71
yeah, i mentioned it to OP that he should DL intelburntest to truly test his pc.
- Apr 14, 2004
- 12,703
- 71
yeah, i mentioned it to OP that he should DL intelburntest to truly test his pc.
- Apr 1, 2006
- 199
- 10
10.13
- Apr 1, 2006
- 199
- 10
10.13
- Sep 11, 2004
- 9,996
- 200
that bloomfield 920 is a classic
- Sep 11, 2004
- 9,996
- 200
that bloomfield 920 is a classic
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- Nov 25, 2005
- 22,524
- 2,383
score 94
17.60 gflops
plus my ssd
17.60 gflops
plus my ssd
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- Nov 25, 2005
- 22,524
- 2,383
score 94
17.60 gflops
plus my ssd
17.60 gflops
plus my ssd
- Dec 5, 2010
- 1,974
- 10
Good or bad?
- Dec 5, 2010
- 1,974
- 10
Good or bad?
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- Nov 25, 2005
- 22,524
- 2,383
try to use up all ur ram for the IBT
secondly i prefer using sisandra but the truth is none of these benchmarks mean anything, they are simply synthetic tests.
For real results you should conduct tests on programs you use because these programs are optimized to run better on certain cpus and its features
secondly i prefer using sisandra but the truth is none of these benchmarks mean anything, they are simply synthetic tests.
For real results you should conduct tests on programs you use because these programs are optimized to run better on certain cpus and its features
shatterkneesinc
Banned
- Nov 25, 2005
- 22,524
- 2,383
try to use up all ur ram for the IBT
secondly i prefer using sisandra but the truth is none of these benchmarks mean anything, they are simply synthetic tests.
For real results you should conduct tests on programs you use because these programs are optimized to run better on certain cpus and its features
secondly i prefer using sisandra but the truth is none of these benchmarks mean anything, they are simply synthetic tests.
For real results you should conduct tests on programs you use because these programs are optimized to run better on certain cpus and its features
- Dec 5, 2010
- 1,974
- 10
How do I do that?
Because I know I have 4 gigs of ram but it said I only had like 2 gigs available.
- Dec 5, 2010
- 1,974
- 10
How do I do that?
Because I know I have 4 gigs of ram but it said I only had like 2 gigs available.
