- 2,817
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
I just a debate on The Herd w/Tim LeglerWallace had:Needed no help on the low postUnselfishDiverse on his offense (6'11" that can shoot it)Runs the floor ala Barkley
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by StillIn729
is this a serious question?
Originally Posted by AIRJORDAN JB23
Sheed had all the talent & ability to be one of the best PF's to ever play... He could rebound, block shots, hit the 3, post up, & that fadeawayWay too much length... Nobody was contesting that. His all around game was VERY impressive. What it came down to was Sheed not putting in the effort 100% of the time & Dirk did so he gets the edge.
This is the best definition of Sheed's game. No doubt he had more talent than Dirk, but just like what had been said before he lacked the drive that was needed to be the best.Originally Posted by CP1708
Til I die, IF Sheed ever had the hunger/drive that was required, he would be the best PF to ever live.
Ever.
And it wouldn't be close.
But Sheed was in fact, Sheed. He cared little about being anything more than he was. Talent wise, he had no ceiling. He was as fundamental as Tim, range even moreso than Dirk, defensive ability like KG, could pass as well as Webber, he just simply did not put in the same work/effort that they all did. Add it all up, and he could have been a top 10 all time NBA player. And I am dead serious. And he's a former Blazer, so don't take me saying this lightly, I rarely speak well of Blazers.
Screen capped. saved. File backed up on external hard drive.Originally Posted by CP1708
Til I die, IF Sheed ever had the hunger/drive that was required, he would be the best PF to ever live.
Ever.
And it wouldn't be close.
But Sheed was in fact, Sheed. He cared little about being anything more than he was. Talent wise, he had no ceiling. He was as fundamental as Tim, range even moreso than Dirk, defensive ability like KG, could pass as well as Webber, he just simply did not put in the same work/effort that they all did. Add it all up, and he could have been a top 10 all time NBA player. And I am dead serious. And he's a former Blazer, so don't take me saying this lightly, I rarely speak well of Blazers.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Til I die, IF Sheed ever had the hunger/drive that was required, he would be the best PF to ever live.
Ever.
And it wouldn't be close.
But Sheed was in fact, Sheed. He cared little about being anything more than he was. Talent wise, he had no ceiling. He was as fundamental as Tim, range even moreso than Dirk, defensive ability like KG, could pass as well as Webber, he just simply did not put in the same work/effort that they all did. Add it all up, and he could have been a top 10 all time NBA player. And I am dead serious. And he's a former Blazer, so don't take me saying this lightly, I rarely speak well of Blazers.
I'm saying.Originally Posted by StillIn729
is this a serious question?