Obama Assassination Program

Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

obama, the president, of the USA, is trying to assassinate an AMERICAN citizen.

that == unconstitutional

you cannot unilaterally decide that its ok to do so, without DUE PROCESS.

http://www.ccrjustice.org...allenge-targeted-killing

my earlier post, was one of personification of my rights as a rape victim ... not that hard.
indifferent.gif
So you're telling me known terrorists who happens to be an American Citizen should first receive due process before the Govt can act?   Yah lets battle this out in courts instead of safe guarding the Nation. 

afp_yemeni_american_Anwar_al-Awlaki_22may10.jpg


All this crap with the ACLU to protect this piece of scum Anwar al-Aulaqi who had emails that tied him directly to killer of the Fort Hood massacre.  Dude made contact with 9/11 hijackers and counseled the xmas day underwear bomber but OH NOOO lets not kill him, let's endanger FBI agents, military special forces and spend countless amounts of US treasury to do everything we can to capture him so that he can have a fair trial. 
smh.gif
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
 
 
Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

obama, the president, of the USA, is trying to assassinate an AMERICAN citizen.

that == unconstitutional

you cannot unilaterally decide that its ok to do so, without DUE PROCESS.

http://www.ccrjustice.org...allenge-targeted-killing

my earlier post, was one of personification of my rights as a rape victim ... not that hard.
indifferent.gif
So you're telling me known terrorists who happens to be an American Citizen should first receive due process before the Govt can act?   Yah lets battle this out in courts instead of safe guarding the Nation. 

afp_yemeni_american_Anwar_al-Awlaki_22may10.jpg


All this crap with the ACLU to protect this piece of scum Anwar al-Aulaqi who had emails that tied him directly to killer of the Fort Hood massacre.  Dude made contact with 9/11 hijackers and counseled the xmas day underwear bomber but OH NOOO lets not kill him, let's endanger FBI agents, military special forces and spend countless amounts of US treasury to do everything we can to capture him so that he can have a fair trial. 
smh.gif
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
 
 
doobie youre a +%*#$++ idiot. pure and simple. i dont care if ANYONE is in danger! the constitution takes precedent over the individual, those individuals you listed should be more concerned about protecting the rights of the citizens and NOT some threat, that THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY assigns as a global terror. if its so cut and dry TRY HIM IN COURT! whats so +%*#$++ hard about that?

if you have a problem with someone and you kill them in the street, do you get to go home like nothing happened? can you say i was defending myself cuz i heard that he wanted to rob me, so its ok to kill him in the street 2 states away? see how far you get ...

its NOT about awlaki ... its about the govt exceeding its powers, to kill americans without due process. if hes a terrorist then bring him over and prove it, it shouldnt be that hard, esp if they are willing to IGNORE the bill of rights!

the problem is that HE CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY AMERICAN LAWYERS, IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW.

if you extrapolate, that means the CIA can come to your doorstep, and shoot you in your face if the dept of treasury puts you on the global terror list. its about rights and precedent. not the individual, who FOR THE RECORD i think is DESPICABLE
 
doobie youre a +%*#$++ idiot. pure and simple. i dont care if ANYONE is in danger! the constitution takes precedent over the individual, those individuals you listed should be more concerned about protecting the rights of the citizens and NOT some threat, that THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY assigns as a global terror. if its so cut and dry TRY HIM IN COURT! whats so +%*#$++ hard about that?

if you have a problem with someone and you kill them in the street, do you get to go home like nothing happened? can you say i was defending myself cuz i heard that he wanted to rob me, so its ok to kill him in the street 2 states away? see how far you get ...

its NOT about awlaki ... its about the govt exceeding its powers, to kill americans without due process. if hes a terrorist then bring him over and prove it, it shouldnt be that hard, esp if they are willing to IGNORE the bill of rights!

the problem is that HE CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY AMERICAN LAWYERS, IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW.

if you extrapolate, that means the CIA can come to your doorstep, and shoot you in your face if the dept of treasury puts you on the global terror list. its about rights and precedent. not the individual, who FOR THE RECORD i think is DESPICABLE
 
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE

Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

obama, the president, of the USA, is trying to assassinate an AMERICAN citizen.



that == unconstitutional



you cannot unilaterally decide that its ok to do so, without DUE PROCESS.



http://www.ccrjustice.org...allenge-targeted-killing



my earlier post, was one of personification of my rights as a rape victim ... not that hard.
indifferent.gif
So you're telling me known terrorists who happens to be an American Citizen should first receive due process before the Govt can act?   Yah lets battle this out in courts instead of safe guarding the Nation. 

afp_yemeni_american_Anwar_al-Awlaki_22may10.jpg


All this crap with the ACLU to protect this piece of scum Anwar al-Aulaqi who had emails that tied him directly to killer of the Fort Hood massacre.  Dude made contact with 9/11 hijackers and counseled the xmas day underwear bomber but OH NOOO lets not kill him, let's endanger FBI agents, military special forces and spend countless amounts of US treasury to do everything we can to capture him so that he can have a fair trial. 
smh.gif
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
 


I agree with SunDoobie
 
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE

Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

obama, the president, of the USA, is trying to assassinate an AMERICAN citizen.



that == unconstitutional



you cannot unilaterally decide that its ok to do so, without DUE PROCESS.



http://www.ccrjustice.org...allenge-targeted-killing



my earlier post, was one of personification of my rights as a rape victim ... not that hard.
indifferent.gif
So you're telling me known terrorists who happens to be an American Citizen should first receive due process before the Govt can act?   Yah lets battle this out in courts instead of safe guarding the Nation. 

afp_yemeni_american_Anwar_al-Awlaki_22may10.jpg


All this crap with the ACLU to protect this piece of scum Anwar al-Aulaqi who had emails that tied him directly to killer of the Fort Hood massacre.  Dude made contact with 9/11 hijackers and counseled the xmas day underwear bomber but OH NOOO lets not kill him, let's endanger FBI agents, military special forces and spend countless amounts of US treasury to do everything we can to capture him so that he can have a fair trial. 
smh.gif
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
 


I agree with SunDoobie
 
Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

doobie youre a +%*#$++ idiot. pure and simple. i dont care if ANYONE is in danger! the constitution takes precedent over the individual, those individuals you listed should be more concerned about protecting the rights of the citizens and NOT some threat, that THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY assigns as a global terror. if its so cut and dry TRY HIM IN COURT! whats so +%*#$++ hard about that?

if you have a problem with someone and you kill them in the street, do you get to go home like nothing happened? can you say i was defending myself cuz i heard that he wanted to rob me, so its ok to kill him in the street 2 states away? see how far you get ...

its NOT about awlaki ... its about the govt exceeding its powers, to kill americans without due process. if hes a terrorist then bring him over and prove it, it shouldnt be that hard, esp if they are willing to IGNORE the bill of rights!

the problem is that HE CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY AMERICAN LAWYERS, IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW.

if you extrapolate, that means the CIA can come to your doorstep, and shoot you in your face if the dept of treasury puts you on the global terror list. its about rights and precedent. not the individual, who FOR THE RECORD i think is DESPICABLE
Yah you're right... I mean what is so hard about putting a known terrorist on trial.  The guy is only living underground and hiding in YEMEN under the protection of Al Qaeda.  Shouldn't be hard to just go there, pick him up and do a jury trial right? 
laugh.gif
at you living in a fantasy world.

You're delusional with your reasoning because the Govt is not putting common everyday criminals on this CIA hit list.  Lindsay Lohan.. you drink and drive.. so she should definitely be on the CIA hit list.   Roger Clemens you're accused of perjury, put him on the CIA hit list too.  Wake UP!
 
Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

doobie youre a +%*#$++ idiot. pure and simple. i dont care if ANYONE is in danger! the constitution takes precedent over the individual, those individuals you listed should be more concerned about protecting the rights of the citizens and NOT some threat, that THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY assigns as a global terror. if its so cut and dry TRY HIM IN COURT! whats so +%*#$++ hard about that?

if you have a problem with someone and you kill them in the street, do you get to go home like nothing happened? can you say i was defending myself cuz i heard that he wanted to rob me, so its ok to kill him in the street 2 states away? see how far you get ...

its NOT about awlaki ... its about the govt exceeding its powers, to kill americans without due process. if hes a terrorist then bring him over and prove it, it shouldnt be that hard, esp if they are willing to IGNORE the bill of rights!

the problem is that HE CANNOT BE DEFENDED BY AMERICAN LAWYERS, IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW.

if you extrapolate, that means the CIA can come to your doorstep, and shoot you in your face if the dept of treasury puts you on the global terror list. its about rights and precedent. not the individual, who FOR THE RECORD i think is DESPICABLE
Yah you're right... I mean what is so hard about putting a known terrorist on trial.  The guy is only living underground and hiding in YEMEN under the protection of Al Qaeda.  Shouldn't be hard to just go there, pick him up and do a jury trial right? 
laugh.gif
at you living in a fantasy world.

You're delusional with your reasoning because the Govt is not putting common everyday criminals on this CIA hit list.  Lindsay Lohan.. you drink and drive.. so she should definitely be on the CIA hit list.   Roger Clemens you're accused of perjury, put him on the CIA hit list too.  Wake UP!
 
They made a mockumentary on a Bush assassination ---> Death of A President
 
They made a mockumentary on a Bush assassination ---> Death of A President
 
IMO, you give up your rights as an american citizen when you plot against or attack the USA.
 
IMO, you give up your rights as an american citizen when you plot against or attack the USA.
 
^^^ no, you dont. thats the point, no matter WHO accuses you, you still have the RIGHT to defend yourself, or have someone defend you. he has been denied BOTH of these INALIENABLE RIGHTS

its in the constitution to be able to dissent the govt. thats how the country got its foundation, by dissenting the oppressive king of GB. why do i have to teach history here?

its not easy to capture him, but if they can kill him they can extradite him. is it easier to trample on our rights? act like im afraid of al queda, matter of fact were working with them in afghan. ... again.

i cannot believe, that you all are complicit in this. this abhorrent ignorance of a precedent thats being set when the president can assassinate his citizens.

like i said, how did stalins russia fare? 21+ million INTERNALLY dead ... 3.3x worse than hitler ... no one says #%#$ cuz it was in house.

you act like its such a stretch for them to do this on american soil ... just cuz it hasnt happened yet doesnt mean that it wont. when you let them take your rights, and you have to lay your life down to get them back. are you willing to die to merely have a lawyer represent you in a court, or just willing to let them judge you before you get to court and sentence you without your knowledge?

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." - Ben $100 Franklin -- dont get it twisted, youre wrong.
 
Americans who align with terrorists and plot to destroy Americans do not deserve due process.

Don't spit on our flag and then wrap yourself with it for protection.
 
^^^ no, you dont. thats the point, no matter WHO accuses you, you still have the RIGHT to defend yourself, or have someone defend you. he has been denied BOTH of these INALIENABLE RIGHTS

its in the constitution to be able to dissent the govt. thats how the country got its foundation, by dissenting the oppressive king of GB. why do i have to teach history here?

its not easy to capture him, but if they can kill him they can extradite him. is it easier to trample on our rights? act like im afraid of al queda, matter of fact were working with them in afghan. ... again.

i cannot believe, that you all are complicit in this. this abhorrent ignorance of a precedent thats being set when the president can assassinate his citizens.

like i said, how did stalins russia fare? 21+ million INTERNALLY dead ... 3.3x worse than hitler ... no one says #%#$ cuz it was in house.

you act like its such a stretch for them to do this on american soil ... just cuz it hasnt happened yet doesnt mean that it wont. when you let them take your rights, and you have to lay your life down to get them back. are you willing to die to merely have a lawyer represent you in a court, or just willing to let them judge you before you get to court and sentence you without your knowledge?

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." - Ben $100 Franklin -- dont get it twisted, youre wrong.
 
Americans who align with terrorists and plot to destroy Americans do not deserve due process.

Don't spit on our flag and then wrap yourself with it for protection.
 
Originally Posted by TeeOh Owens

IMO, you give up your rights as an american citizen when you plot against or attack the USA.
THIS.
 
Originally Posted by TeeOh Owens

IMO, you give up your rights as an american citizen when you plot against or attack the USA.
THIS.
 
you all are missing the point.

its NOT about AWLAKI ... its about your rights, as an american citizen.

if you can prove hes treasonous then DO IT. else dont assassinate citizens.
 
Originally Posted by oXo yzarc oXo

^^^ no, you dont. thats the point, no matter WHO accuses you, you still have the RIGHT to defend yourself, or have someone defend you. he has been denied BOTH of these INALIENABLE RIGHTS

its in the constitution to be able to dissent the govt. thats how the country got its foundation, by dissenting the oppressive king of GB. why do i have to teach history here?

its not easy to capture him, but if they can kill him they can extradite him. is it easier to trample on our rights? act like im afraid of al queda, matter of fact were working with them in afghan. ... again.

i cannot believe, that you all are complicit in this. this abhorrent ignorance of a precedent thats being set when the president can assassinate his citizens.

like i said, how did stalins russia fare? 21+ million INTERNALLY dead ... 3.3x worse than hitler ... no one says #%#$ cuz it was in house.

you act like its such a stretch for them to do this on american soil ... just cuz it hasnt happened yet doesnt mean that it wont. when you let them take your rights, and you have to lay your life down to get them back. are you willing to die to merely have a lawyer represent you in a court, or just willing to let them judge you before you get to court and sentence you without your knowledge?

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." - Ben $100 Franklin -- dont get it twisted, youre wrong.
This is what happens when idiots try and discuss politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom