You decide your level of scrutiny based on the viewpoint of the poster. That is, in fact, text book bias.
Allegedly
But we can wait and see on that one
For now, I suggest we agree to disagree
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You decide your level of scrutiny based on the viewpoint of the poster. That is, in fact, text book bias.
Excellent misrepresentation of what was said.You decide your level of scrutiny based on the viewpoint of the poster. That is, in fact, text book bias.
I probably would if they were constantly sniveling about the inequity of the "echo chamber"
But don't let me stop the boot licking bonanza
Nothing is wrong with bias. Indeed knowing your biases is a strength. Hence, #Growth.
You showed TREMENDOUS #GROWTH when you defended Roy Moore to the bitter end.
Your example is a campaign finance violation.The reimbursement was reported in the 2017 disclosures.
President's often leave things off of disclosures, often resulting in fines.
Here is one such example:
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/obama-2008-campaign-fined-375000-085784
Excellent misrepresentation of what was said.
I defended due process, and will continue to defend it. Historically, the erosion of due process has not worked out well for people that look like me.
The reimbursement was reported in the 2017 disclosures.
President's often leave things off of disclosures, often resulting in fines.
Here is one such example:
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/obama-2008-campaign-fined-375000-085784
Also omitted numerous payments for sex from ladies that looked like his daughter (his words) and payments from other countries. Some of those payments actually being sexOh please, the Obama campaign missed a 48 hour deadline to report $1,000 or more contributions before the election cutoff because they got a late rush of campaign contributions. Trump was actively hiding the contributions. Don't equate the two situations.
Ah, my mistake. I guess I assumed you were talking about viewpoints as they pertain to the topic of politics.In an effort to assist:
view·point
/ˈvyo͞oˌpoint/
noun
noun: viewpoint; plural noun: viewpoints
- another term for point of view.
point of view
noun
noun: point of view; plural noun: points of view
- a particular attitude or way of considering a matter.
"I'm trying to get Matthew to change his point of view"
synonyms: opinion, view, belief, attitude, feeling, sentiment, way of thinking, way of looking at it, thoughts, ideas More
- the position from which something or someone is observed.
- "certain aspects are not visible from a single point of view"
Because of the power structure that exists, evolved and is perpetuated by people like DT and old white dudes that make up the GOP.
Sooooo when we were talking about vaccines I did not realize there were ongoing measles outbreaks in the US right now
No one ever suggested ridding the system of due process, it's just a convenient talking point for this guy to misrepresent views.Breh defending due process for the folks that selectively believe in it
Stockholm Syndrome
Your example is a campaign finance violation.
If Trump willfully ommitted that disclosure from the financial disclosure he released in 2017, that's a different crime. Why does this need to be explained to a lawyer...?
And according to the SDNY prosecutors, Cohen was reimbursed for $420,000 in 2017 in monthly installments of $35k checks.
Trump's 2018 financial disclosure only listed the reimbursement as ranging between $101,000 to $250,000.
No one ever suggested ridding the system of due process, it's just a convenient talking point for this guy to misrepresent views.
Believing Roy Moore committing acts of sexual assault is not the same as stating someone should be sent to jail on allegations alone.
But he knows that, he's just trolling.
Because of the power structure that exists, evolved and is perpetuated by people like DT and old white dudes that make up the GOP.
i can’t believe that someone intelligent enough to pass the bar would publicly condone pedophilia. so disgusting
Ah, my mistake. I guess I assumed you were talking about viewpoints as they pertain to the topic of politics.
You were just painting yourself as a victim anyway you could.
The Roy Moore thing is when a couple people went on block. His whole town outed him, hand written sexual evidence, multiple families, entire schools, entire malls..... “he didn’t go to jail did he??” Becuase going to jail is the end all be all to everything....... becuase we’ve never seen police shoot innocent people and not go to jail....No one ever suggested ridding the system of due process, it's just a convenient talking point for this guy to misrepresent views.
Believing Roy Moore committing acts of sexual assault is not the same as stating someone should be sent to jail on allegations alone.
But he knows that, he's just trolling.
So do you support the erosion of due process or not?
This is easy to glance over as just another tweet.
But take a moment to take it all in, this is the highest office, maybe of the world.