R Kelly is a sick and sadistic individual

[DadNboujee]

Don't feel like going through the thread.

We don't know the full details

But isn't rkelly doing something similar to what's Hugh Hefner is doing?

 

[6pac]

Don't feel like going through the thread.

We don't know the full details

But isn't rkelly doing something similar to what's Hugh Hefner is doing?

yes but people are mad @ his overall history and are basically tight that he's gone unpunished and has the audacity to still b out here wilding lol

 

[VARNELL HILL]

The bizarre thing about you "we know he's a pedophile but this is legal" dudes...is that at the end of the day...you're still arguing in the favor of....a pedophile. If it's standing on a "moral high horse" to say I'm not co-signing a pedophile on ANYTHING...oh well. I'm on my high horse then. I don't give a **** if he is "innocent". He's still a pedophile...so I think you're a scum bag and you're guilty of everything in my eyes.

I don't care...

Even as far legality goes...we're only to assume he's following the law based on the statement made by ONE of the "roommates", and she did so because her family is the one that put this out there. There have been other allegations that one of the other woman has been with R. Kelly since she was 14. There's also been allegations that he abuses the women mentally and physically. For you ****** to take the "oh well...her parents dropped her off...why should I care" approach...I guess since since her parents didn't have any dignity or common sense...that means you shouldn't either right?

And please let the Hugh Hefner reach go. Let's say we did entertain this bull**** for a second...and agree that Hugh Hefner's a creep. Maybe he is a ****ing creep...WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT A KNOWN P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E may be doing?

Ya'll going real hard to argue on the principle of technicality for a ***** with an obvious sickness...all because the ***** made Ignition.

 

[Malcolm XXX]

What does Hugh Hefner have to say about this?

 

[SC kid]

I don't give a **** what r Kelly does honestly.

He was a creep...now he's whatever.

I like the music he has made. But i mean I wouldn't invite him over to play Mario kart.

 

[VARNELL HILL]

I don't give a **** what r Kelly does honestly.

He was a creep...now he's whatever.

I like the music he has made. But i mean I wouldn't invite him over to play Mario kart.

I can respect this position. You don't have to dislike Trapped In The Closet, or dislike The Cosby Show to have some common dignity. The mental gymnastics over the possibility of this weirdo old *** ***** running a sex cult is incredible to me.

 

[6pac]

The bizarre thing about you "we know he's a pedophile but this is legal" dudes...is that at the end of the day...you're still arguing in the favor of....a pedophile. If it's standing on a "moral high horse" to say I'm not co-signing a pedophile on ANYTHING...oh well. I'm on my high horse then. I don't give a **** if he is "innocent". He's still a pedophile...so I think you're a scum bag and you're guilty of everything in my eyes.

I don't care...

Even as far legality goes...we're only to assume he's following the law based on the statement made by ONE of the "roommates", and she did so because her family is the one that put this out there. There have been other allegations that one of the other woman has been with R. Kelly since she was 14. There's also been allegations that he abuses the women mentally and physically. For you *****s to take the "oh well...her parents dropped her off...why should I care" approach...I guess since since her parents didn't have any dignity or common sense...that means you shouldn't either right?

And please let the Hugh Hefner reach go. Let's say we did entertain this bull**** for a second...and agree that Hugh Hefner's a creep. Maybe he is a ****ing creep...WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT A KNOWN P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E may be doing?

Ya'll going real hard to argue on the principle of technicality for a ***** with an obvious sickness...all because the ***** made Ignition.

i dont think anyone is looking into it that deep

i think we're just being objective in saying that this specific situation [currently appears] to be legal

nobody is really "in his favor" we're just being objective...which you understandably just admitted youre unable to do because of his overall history

its definitely some weird **** going on people brushed that shadow on that girls shirt under the rug like it was nothing lol and people are overall meme'ing it away but what do you want people to do when you have girls making videos telling their fathers to mind their got dam business lol

but weird or not people are just asking what is the resolution here other than wagging your finger...what changed about r kelly as it related to his previous allegations before you heard this story and after you heard this story...like i said it just pisses people off that hes engaging in this type of behavior and understandably so...people wanna see him locked away but he's not giving them enuff to do it

 

[Mark Antony]

The bizarre thing about you "we know he's a pedophile but this is legal" dudes...is that at the end of the day...you're still arguing in the favor of....a pedophile. If it's standing on a "moral high horse" to say I'm not co-signing a pedophile on ANYTHING...oh well. I'm on my high horse then. I don't give a **** if he is "innocent". He's still a pedophile...so I think you're a scum bag and you're guilty of everything in my eyes.

I don't care...

Even as far legality goes...we're only to assume he's following the law based on the statement made by ONE of the "roommates", and she did so because her family is the one that put this out there. There have been other allegations that one of the other woman has been with R. Kelly since she was 14. There's also been allegations that he abuses the women mentally and physically. For you *****s to take the oh well...her parents dropped her off...why should I care" approach...I guess since since her parents didn't have any dignity or common sense...that means you shouldn't either right?

And please let the Hugh Hefner reach go. Let's say we did entertain this bull**** for a second...and agree that Hugh Hefner's a creep. Maybe he is a ****ing creep...WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHAT A KNOWN P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E may be doing?

Ya'll going real hard to argue on the principle of technicality for a ***** with an obvious sickness...all because the ***** made Ignition.

Lol i'm saying, dudes throwing out moral high horse like that's supposed to make you feel bad or something. Best of luck to you all and your logic.

 

[RIP sleazyy]

Some of them Playboy girls said Hugh had underage chicks, weird strict rules, and kept them drugged up too.

One of them Cosby chicks said Hef was letting Bill drug teenage girls too.

Entertainment industry nasty as hell.

 

[6pac]

Some of them Playboy girls said Hugh had underage chicks, weird strict rules, and kept them drugged up too.

One of them Cosby chicks said Hef was letting Bill drug teenage girls too.

Entertainment industry nasty as hell.

in 20 years i feel like potentially a lot of these rappers gonna have similar cases with how recreationally popping prescription level pills and doing virtual heroin is rn.

 

[VARNELL HILL]

i dont think anyone is looking into it that deep

i think we're just being objective in saying that this specific situation [currently appears] to be legal

nobody is really "in his favor" we're just being objective...which you understandably just admitted youre unable to do because of his overall history

its definitely some weird **** going on people brushed that shadow on that girls shirt under the rug like it was nothing lol and people are overall meme'ing it away but what do you want people to do when you have girls making videos telling their fathers to mind their got dam business lol

but weird or not people are just asking what is the resolution here other than wagging your finger...what changed about r kelly as it related to his previous allegations before you heard this story and after you heard this story...like i said it just pisses people off that hes engaging in this type of behavior and understandably so...people wanna see him locked away but he's not giving them enuff to do it

Why should my public opinion hinge on the premise of having a resolution or not?

I don't know what the resolution is. It's not my job to come up with one. I'm a public citizen, which means I have an opinion. Millions of Americans have an idea on how to resolve who's in the White House right now...but it doesn't ****ing matter does it? I guess they should stop giving their opinions on it then.

I could care less if R. Kelly is locked or not. Didn't Bill Cosby just basically get his history erased and revenue streams clipped by mere accusations? How about let's start by getting R. Kelly the **** up out of the paint...but you ****** would probably have a fit and protest the minute 12 Play disappeared from your Spotify accounts.

This my last post in here...because i know who I'm talking to here and i refuse to run in circles or otherwise I just might be as insane. Aaron McGruder made a tv episode about this dynamic.

 

[dabottom305]

2 days later and 6pac is still making sense lol

 

[Master Zik]

Eh, same dudes in here throwing shade on those having a logical stance on what Kellz is doing being legal are the same dudes saying it aint rape when they get females drunk enough to smash.

 

[Belgium]

Sounds like something that creepy *** pedophile would do.

 

[dabottom305]

Eh, same dudes in here throwing shade on those having a logical stance on what Kellz is doing being legal are the same dudes saying it aint rape when they get females drunk enough to smash.

No one is throwing "shade" lol.. but that assumption you just made about dudes getting girls drunk enough to smash is what I was talking about the other day. You can't separate your emotions about what he did over a decade ago from what he's currently being accused of now. Its that type of thinking that gets cases dismissed. Too much passion, not enough logic/objectiveness.

 

[Master Zik]

No one is throwing "shade" lol.. but that assumption you just made about dudes getting girls drunk enough to smash is what I was talking about the other day. You can't separate your emotions about what he did over a decade ago from what he's currently being accused of now. Its that type of thinking that gets cases dismissed. Too much passion, not enough logic/objectiveness.

No.

The posts I'm talking about are definitely throwing shade and outright questioning posters as ppl.

Its so ridiculous to start off your post with no one is doing x when its clear as ****ing day some ppl are. Read the thread.

As far as what you're talking about, lol You manage to miss my point that dudes are in this thread saying Kelly is a pedophile and be some of the same dudes saying it aint nothing wrong to get a chick liquored up to hit.

No emotions involved. Just an observation

 

[kingkoopa]

Eh, same dudes in here throwing shade on those having a logical stance on what Kellz is doing being legal are the same dudes saying it aint rape when they get females drunk enough to smash.

I've never gotten a girl drunk so I can smash.

But if she gets herself drunk I'm in them guts!

 

[Maximus Meridius]

Some of them Playboy girls said Hugh had underage chicks, weird strict rules, and kept them drugged up too.

One of them Cosby chicks said Hef was letting Bill drug teenage girls too.

Entertainment industry nasty as hell.

I wouldn't doubt that at all. Hef was around a bunch of girls that people said was 18. I seriously doubt all them girls was 18 and he just so happen to catch them soon as they turned 18.

 

[jaysrcrak]

Just caught up on this thread.
FYI for all the people calling R. Kelly a pedophile

Pedophilia- a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
Hebephilia- is defined as individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in 11- to 14-year-old pubescents.
Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.

So no, R. Kelly is NOT a pedophile, he is a ephebophile. Not defending or condemning him ijs, he ain't out here having sex with 6 and 7 year olds.

But it does make me wonder about how we judge things in situations like these.
On one hand people are mad that a 50 year old R. Kelly has sex with 18 and 19 year olds, and the fact that he scouts them out even younger at 16 or 17. On the other hand we have a much older Hugh Hefner who has been celebrated for decades for doing the EXACT same thing. Even worse. He photographed them and capitalized off of them(pimped them)

Not to mention we conveniently turn a blind eye to all of the guzzling, gaping, face smashing, gang bangs and countless other depraved acts that take place, in a porn industry DOMINATED by barely legal, 18 year old young women.
Dudes fap to that EVERYDAY and aren't the slightest bit morally disgusted.

It's just interesting how thin the line is between what people will willingly accept and vehemently denounce.

 

[Hahahaha]

Well said

 

[putting in work]

Very well said

 

[htg designs]

Robert been telling us hes on one, since day one:

"My mind's telling me no" he recognizes he has reached a point in his intellectual awareness and mental state, due to situational developments of what could potentially take place, and has concluded further participation would not be ideal to his core values and would be deemed unacceptable by his current mental frame work.

" But my body, my bodyyyyy telling me ye-es" His physical and chemical receptors are in conflict with his mental state due to an overload of stimulation and are challenging to override his psychological check to show restraint and disengage himself from said situation.

"No, I don't wanna hurt no body" this statement acknowledges and affirms intent for safe involvement, however, the need to make such statement illudes to the potentiality of pain being received directly and or indirectly by the others (2nd and or 3rd party etc...). So, he in effect prepares himself for any retorts to his objective.

"But there's something I must confeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees" As his emotions overwhelm him and alters his psychological outlook, he arrives to a place of acceptance and reveal. He has reached a level of comfort within himself that he feels free to share his renewed perspective and fully developed desires. To gain the proper acceptance, he allows himself to be vulnerable which he believes will invite a level of understanding.

"I don't see nothing wrong, with a little bump and grind" His reformatted mindset attempts to persuade and downplay his desire, from which initially caused inner conflict, to now feuling and guiding his thought process. He now fully embraces his desires and intends to fulfill them as thoroughly and vigorously as possible.

 

[kingkoopa]

Just caught up on this thread.
FYI for all the people calling R. Kelly a pedophile

Pedophilia- a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
Hebephilia- is defined as individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in 11- to 14-year-old pubescents.
Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.

So no, R. Kelly is NOT a pedophile, he is a ephebophile.

HE'S........ THAT......... GUY! (trumpet)

 

[ZOMBAVELI THE DON]

pedophile hebophile how eva u wanna play it kellz a creep lol

 

[Magic33]

Just caught up on this thread.
FYI for all the people calling R. Kelly a pedophile

Pedophilia- a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
Hebephilia- is defined as individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in 11- to 14-year-old pubescents.
Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.

So no, R. Kelly is NOT a pedophile, he is a ephebophile. Not defending or condemning him ijs, he ain't out here having sex with 6 and 7 year olds.

But it does make me wonder about how we judge things in situations like these.
On one hand people are mad that a 50 year old R. Kelly has sex with 18 and 19 year olds, and the fact that he scouts them out even younger at 16 or 17. On the other hand we have a much older Hugh Hefner who has been celebrated for decades for doing the EXACT same thing. Even worse. He photographed them and capitalized off of them(pimped them)

Not to mention we conveniently turn a blind eye to all of the guzzling, gaping, face smashing, gang bangs and countless other depraved acts that take place, in a porn industry DOMINATED by barely legal, 18 year old young women.
Dudes fap to that EVERYDAY and aren't the slightest bit morally disgusted.

It's just interesting how thin the line is between what people will willingly accept and vehemently denounce.

So if you are for breast cancer awareness, do you have to be against AIDS, prostate cancer, skin cancer, diabetes too? What about world peace, animal rights?

This argument is always silly to me, but people think it's a logical argument.

People who are involved in porn and Playboy, were legal adults. They can consent, legally.

R Kelly has a history of sexual abuse of underage girls. It's on tape. He's been charged. He married one. Their family members talked about it.

So how in the hell are they comparable? You're trying to equate a 15 year old to a 19 year old? Really?