- 3,937
- 2,069
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
So if you are for breast cancer awareness, do you have to be against AIDS, prostate cancer, skin cancer, diabetes too? What about world peace, animal rights?
This argument is always silly to me, but people think it's a logical argument.
People who are involved in porn and Playboy, were legal adults. They can consent, legally.
R Kelly has a history of sexual abuse of underage girls. It's on tape. He's been charged. He married one. Their family members talked about it.
So how in the hell are they comparable? You're trying to equate a 15 year old to a 19 year old? Really?
As always, you bring up a point that has NOTHING to do with the point I was ASKING about. AIDS, Diabetes... TF does that have to do with what I said?
All I did was quote a definition. If you have a problem with the definition of these terms, refer your complaint to Oxford and Webster.
But to rebut your asinine assumption of me "equating" a 15 year old to a 19 year old"
I'm not. If you read, 15 to 19 year old is in the same category: Ephebophilia
What I compared was someone having sex to 5 and 6 year olds to someone having sex with 18 and 19 year old, legally consenting adults, that CHOOSE to be there.
If you cant see the difference in that, then I'm not sure what is wrong with you.
On THAT basis, the question I asked is, is R. Kelly's desire to have sex with 18 and 19 year old young women
any more depraved than what happens to the women in porn of the same age group. It's a valid question about perceptions.