- 506
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2009
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by ricky409
dug this grave up to ask the question...
who's would you pick to take that 3 thatt you desperately need?
Originally Posted by Dok
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.
Originally Posted by Wisconsin 4 Life
Originally Posted by Dok
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.
Originally Posted by nublee
Originally Posted by Wisconsin 4 Life
Originally Posted by Dok
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.
Originally Posted by nublee
Originally Posted by Wisconsin 4 Life
Originally Posted by Dok
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.
Originally Posted by CarlofromdaPI
Originally Posted by nublee
Originally Posted by Wisconsin 4 Life
Originally Posted by Dok
Reggie miller is better. Ray Allen always played with a group of all stars. in Seattle, he had Payton and Kemp. In Boston, he has Garnet and Peirce. Reggie was always the main focus of the opposing team.