It will be heartbreaking if the Kings leave Sacramento. I'm not a Kings fan (tho I loved watching them in '02/Webber days) so I don't know all the details of the current situation, but I remember hearing that in the early 90s when the team was mostly irrelevant the team would still do well in attendance (true?). Is this an issue of getting a new arena or do the Maloofs just have no interest in keeping the team in Sac? When the team was winning, those guys seemed so proud to be a part of the city. Plus, I thought Vegas was always the destination they were flirting with.
Even as a Blazers fan, I still feel terrible about how Seattle got robbed of the Sonics and will never consider rooting for OKC. No city deserves to have a team more than Seattle, but I would feel ambivalent if the "new" Sonics came from a small market like Sacramento (not that this is a possibility). Looking at the NBA map, it's hard to see how a place like Memphis should still have a team (after abandoning Vancouver, the Tigers seem to get bigger crowds). From one loyal, small market to another: We're rooting for you Sactown!
It's lonely in the PNW!
Come on Seattle, get that new arena and bring back the Sonics! (Just hopefully not from NO - it would be a minor tragedy if Hornets name & logo went extinct). Also, is it true that OKC, even w/o keeping the name, got to keep the "history" of the Sonics (championship, records, etc.)? Stern and Bennett
Sidenote: There would be no greater justice than if the Grizz relocated to Seattle, and after becoming a free agent in a few years, Durant decided to sign with them.