- 442
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
That's a terrible idea, a teenager? So they want to see an emotional kid again? Spider-Man 3?
Sony Rebooting Spider-Man in 2012!
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
brandonroy3 wrote:
toby maguire was the perfect actor playing peter parker.... and no spiderman is a deeper movie than the dark knight ever will be. the dark knight is all action, everyday people can relate to spiderman
right i can relate having spidey senses andshooting web out of my palms...right
batman is a way deeper character than spiderman will ever be...plus batman has no superpowers so i think that makes him more relatable
its too early for a reboot...i bet theyre gonna make it all dark
- 8,392
- 268
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2001
Yea there's no need for an Origin movie. Like someone said, do it more like the Hulk. Where there is a little back story, but for the most part it justwent off the fact that people knew the backstory from the previous one (granted it was basura) but they didnt act like people dont already know the story.Spiderman is one of the most popular comics every and there is no need for them to do another movie where we show him get bit by a spider in highschool and hehas to learn his new abilities and what not.
And please dont let Bay direct this. Hes good for transformers because he can have expolsions. But if he does Spiderman, everytime spidey shoots a web and letsgo to shoot another one it would end up causing an explosion. NY would be demolished within the first hour of the movie.
And please dont let Bay direct this. Hes good for transformers because he can have expolsions. But if he does Spiderman, everytime spidey shoots a web and letsgo to shoot another one it would end up causing an explosion. NY would be demolished within the first hour of the movie.
- 5,334
- 288
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
Originally Posted by Goldmember
Originally Posted by Jiggaman414
Spider Man 1 & 2 were great. just because the 3rd one wasn't so great means they have to reboot the series? very unnecessary if you ask me. all they have to do is just make the 4th movie solid and people will forget about the 3rd one.
- 1,735
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
Malkovich Confirms Vulture Role in Spider-Man 4
Source:BadTaste.it
January 10, 2010
With all the rumors and speculation about Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 4, whether or not it will make its scheduled May 5, 2011 release date and why it has run into production problems, it's come out in the wash that John Malkovich was indeed up for the role of the Vulture, Raimi's choice of villain for the fourth movie, which was first broken by Movieline a month ago.
Malkovich was interviewed by an Italian sports show called "Quelli Che il Calcio" and he was asked not only about whether he had been approached to play the Vulture but also about the production delays. The fine folks at the Italian web site Bad Taste have graciously provided an English summation of what was said on the show:
"When conductor Simona Ventura asked him about his role of Vulture in the movie, he not only didn't deny his involvement, but confirmed that he's waiting for the final script to be sent to him, and that the movie has been delayed. He also hopes that shooting will begin as soon as possible."
Some may remember that Malkovich was the alternate choice to play the Green Goblin in the first "Spider-Man" movie, a role that went to his Shadow of the Vampire co-star Willem Dafoe, so it has always made perfect sense that Raimi would be interested in him to play a Spidey villain. The question is whether Sony will agree to the lesser Spider-Man villain for such an important tentpole franchise.
We're hoping a clip of Malkovich's appearance will appear online soon, but if you're fluent in Italian, you can read the full transcript of Malkovich's appearance in Italian on BadTaste.it.
Source:BadTaste.it
January 10, 2010
Malkovich was interviewed by an Italian sports show called "Quelli Che il Calcio" and he was asked not only about whether he had been approached to play the Vulture but also about the production delays. The fine folks at the Italian web site Bad Taste have graciously provided an English summation of what was said on the show:
"When conductor Simona Ventura asked him about his role of Vulture in the movie, he not only didn't deny his involvement, but confirmed that he's waiting for the final script to be sent to him, and that the movie has been delayed. He also hopes that shooting will begin as soon as possible."
Some may remember that Malkovich was the alternate choice to play the Green Goblin in the first "Spider-Man" movie, a role that went to his Shadow of the Vampire co-star Willem Dafoe, so it has always made perfect sense that Raimi would be interested in him to play a Spidey villain. The question is whether Sony will agree to the lesser Spider-Man villain for such an important tentpole franchise.
We're hoping a clip of Malkovich's appearance will appear online soon, but if you're fluent in Italian, you can read the full transcript of Malkovich's appearance in Italian on BadTaste.it.
- 3,455
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
Truth
- 375
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
Originally Posted by KB8sandiego
I want a reboot with a dark McFarlane Spidey.
This.
or
Maximum Carnage
or
Kraven's last hunt
or
just what the other said, Spidey vs The Sinister Six
- 4,617
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
This guy should get the part^^Originally Posted by EveryDayKicks
I should play the new spider man
- 3,038
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
Nerdy/Cocky Spider-Man would be great.Originally Posted by Jiffyl00b
They tried too play that out in Spiderman 3 and that didn't turn out too well...emo/cocky/dancing Peter ParkerOriginally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Spider-Man needs to be able to go full 180 from nerd to cockyhole.
Nerdy/Cocky Toby is where the fail came in.
- 3,038
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
brandonroy3 wrote:toby maguire was the perfect actor playing peter parker.... and no spiderman is a deeper movie than the dark knight ever will be. the dark knight is all action, everyday people can relate to spiderman
batman is a way deeper character than spiderman will ever be...plus batman has no superpowers so i think that makes him more relatable
its too early for a reboot...i bet theyre gonna make it all dark
Spider-Man >>>> Batman
I can't relate to Spider Man OR Batman.
But I can relate to Peter Parker. Can't relate to Bruce Wayne. (Soon.
You never been a broke dude tryina make it but your life sucks cuz you got stuff on your plate that no one else can know about?
- 4,514
- 408
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
Knowing Sony Peter Parker will most likely be played by Zack Efron...Smfh.
- 1,250
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2007
on another note, i just beat maximum carnage for SNES
- 21,197
- 18,113
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
Probably one of the coolest things back in the dayOriginally Posted by dirtyxcanto
on another note, i just beat maximum carnage for SNES
- 916
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2004
Originally Posted by dirtyxcanto
on another note, i just beat maximum carnage for SNES
You lie! The bad guys had Zues-like range and power in that game.
Congrats though
- 2,213
- 16
- Joined
- May 2, 2006
this reboot was needed badly.... casting from the beginning was horrible.
character progression in all 3 movies was horrible,
Spiderman movies actually were done terriibly... they did well, but they were bad.... starting with that horrible Green Goblin costume,
Tobey never made anyone believe he was Peter Parker, Kristen Dunst....... can only dream of playing MJ, Franco as Harry was ehhh.... and the way the storyprogressed was corny, cheesy, and it was stupid.... Harry turning into that ****** Goblin in 3 was one of the dumbest things i ever saw.
the REASON SM4 wasnt going to get made.... Sony.... seeing how Marvel is handeling Iron Man, Hulk, IM2, Thor, Captain america, Avengers with extreme caution,and the hands on work thats going on with the studios and the actual comic creators... they wanted Raimi to kind of go in that direction..... Raimi, wantedtoo take SM4 in an even more clown shoes direction.... even starting the movie off with a musical fight scene..... Sony wasnt having it....
also Raimi has this obsession with Vulture... and he was dead set on doing Vulture in the movie.... and having Felicia Hardy be his daughter
Vulture is NOT a villan that should carry a whole movie.... NOT at all.... and i dont even wanna think of who they would cast to play Felicia/Black Cat....
Sony had enough..... Thor got SM4's release date, and thats all she wrote for Raimi's reign over Spiderman movies.....
If Disney doesnt buy back the rights to Spiderman, im sure Marvel will be more involved with this new reboot.... or at least they better be.
2012 release for the reboot makes sense ONLY... if they plan to coincide with the Avengers line up of movies..... it would be great to see Spiderman pop up inone of those movies. if Sony doesnt see the profitability of cross marketing, they are damn fools
character progression in all 3 movies was horrible,
Spiderman movies actually were done terriibly... they did well, but they were bad.... starting with that horrible Green Goblin costume,
Tobey never made anyone believe he was Peter Parker, Kristen Dunst....... can only dream of playing MJ, Franco as Harry was ehhh.... and the way the storyprogressed was corny, cheesy, and it was stupid.... Harry turning into that ****** Goblin in 3 was one of the dumbest things i ever saw.
the REASON SM4 wasnt going to get made.... Sony.... seeing how Marvel is handeling Iron Man, Hulk, IM2, Thor, Captain america, Avengers with extreme caution,and the hands on work thats going on with the studios and the actual comic creators... they wanted Raimi to kind of go in that direction..... Raimi, wantedtoo take SM4 in an even more clown shoes direction.... even starting the movie off with a musical fight scene..... Sony wasnt having it....
also Raimi has this obsession with Vulture... and he was dead set on doing Vulture in the movie.... and having Felicia Hardy be his daughter
Vulture is NOT a villan that should carry a whole movie.... NOT at all.... and i dont even wanna think of who they would cast to play Felicia/Black Cat....
Sony had enough..... Thor got SM4's release date, and thats all she wrote for Raimi's reign over Spiderman movies.....
If Disney doesnt buy back the rights to Spiderman, im sure Marvel will be more involved with this new reboot.... or at least they better be.
2012 release for the reboot makes sense ONLY... if they plan to coincide with the Avengers line up of movies..... it would be great to see Spiderman pop up inone of those movies. if Sony doesnt see the profitability of cross marketing, they are damn fools
21shots
Banned
- 307
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
Guillermo Del Toro.
Do it Sony
Do it Sony
- 1,941
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
For a minute there I confused Guillermo with Benicio and thought you were suggesting he play SM
I actually think Malkovich as Vulture is a good idea, got me thinking what could've been but Felicia as his daughter is blasphemy.
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
Originally Posted by JayPesoz
Probably one of the coolest things back in the dayOriginally Posted by dirtyxcanto
on another note, i just beat maximum carnage for SNES
- 12,536
- 39
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
Originally Posted by JayPesoz
Probably one of the coolest things back in the dayOriginally Posted by dirtyxcanto
on another note, i just beat maximum carnage for SNES
- 3,455
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
Thanks for the information.Originally Posted by Infyrno23
this reboot was needed badly.... casting from the beginning was horrible.
character progression in all 3 movies was horrible,
Spiderman movies actually were done terriibly... they did well, but they were bad.... starting with that horrible Green Goblin costume,
Tobey never made anyone believe he was Peter Parker, Kristen Dunst....... can only dream of playing MJ, Franco as Harry was ehhh.... and the way the story progressed was corny, cheesy, and it was stupid.... Harry turning into that ****** Goblin in 3 was one of the dumbest things i ever saw.
the REASON SM4 wasnt going to get made.... Sony.... seeing how Marvel is handeling Iron Man, Hulk, IM2, Thor, Captain america, Avengers with extreme caution, and the hands on work thats going on with the studios and the actual comic creators... they wanted Raimi to kind of go in that direction..... Raimi, wanted too take SM4 in an even more clown shoes direction.... even starting the movie off with a musical fight scene..... Sony wasnt having it....
also Raimi has this obsession with Vulture... and he was dead set on doing Vulture in the movie.... and having Felicia Hardy be his daughter
Vulture is NOT a villan that should carry a whole movie.... NOT at all.... and i dont even wanna think of who they would cast to play Felicia/Black Cat....
Sony had enough..... Thor got SM4's release date, and thats all she wrote for Raimi's reign over Spiderman movies.....
If Disney doesnt buy back the rights to Spiderman, im sure Marvel will be more involved with this new reboot.... or at least they better be.
2012 release for the reboot makes sense ONLY... if they plan to coincide with the Avengers line up of movies..... it would be great to see Spiderman pop up in one of those movies. if Sony doesnt see the profitability of cross marketing, they are damn fools
- 1,735
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
from waht i read over at SSH supposdly they had anne hathaway in mind to play blackcat
- 684
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2002
I LOVED Tobey as Spiderman
- 11,513
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
Originally Posted by brandonroy3
toby maguire was the perfect actor playing peter parker.... and no spiderman is a deeper movie than the dark knight ever will be. the dark knight is all action, everyday people can relate to spiderman
- 17,627
- 6,819
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
Originally Posted by eeibaby
Thanks for the information.Originally Posted by Infyrno23
this reboot was needed badly.... casting from the beginning was horrible.
character progression in all 3 movies was horrible,
Spiderman movies actually were done terriibly... they did well, but they were bad.... starting with that horrible Green Goblin costume,
Tobey never made anyone believe he was Peter Parker, Kristen Dunst....... can only dream of playing MJ, Franco as Harry was ehhh.... and the way the story progressed was corny, cheesy, and it was stupid.... Harry turning into that ****** Goblin in 3 was one of the dumbest things i ever saw.
the REASON SM4 wasnt going to get made.... Sony.... seeing how Marvel is handeling Iron Man, Hulk, IM2, Thor, Captain america, Avengers with extreme caution, and the hands on work thats going on with the studios and the actual comic creators... they wanted Raimi to kind of go in that direction..... Raimi, wanted too take SM4 in an even more clown shoes direction.... even starting the movie off with a musical fight scene..... Sony wasnt having it....
also Raimi has this obsession with Vulture... and he was dead set on doing Vulture in the movie.... and having Felicia Hardy be his daughter
Vulture is NOT a villan that should carry a whole movie.... NOT at all.... and i dont even wanna think of who they would cast to play Felicia/Black Cat....
Sony had enough..... Thor got SM4's release date, and thats all she wrote for Raimi's reign over Spiderman movies.....
If Disney doesnt buy back the rights to Spiderman, im sure Marvel will be more involved with this new reboot.... or at least they better be.
2012 release for the reboot makes sense ONLY... if they plan to coincide with the Avengers line up of movies..... it would be great to see Spiderman pop up in one of those movies. if Sony doesnt see the profitability of cross marketing, they are damn fools
opening sequence of a musical fight scene
