- Aug 10, 2003
- 27,410
- 21,946
not even worth being limited
Tier 0 Blazer Supreme
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by webnoize,
- Start date
- Jan 6, 2008
- 1,105
- 26
dont really like how waxed leather looks in person
- Dec 10, 2008
- 11,385
- 31
does anybody got a price. Huf is notorious for no vaseline. lol
- Mar 8, 2004
- 1,025
- 13
Oh the new Dunk goes one piece - so predictable.
Look for inside outs and Blazerestsos next...
Look for inside outs and Blazerestsos next...
- Jul 13, 2008
- 734
- 11
clean, but not worth it
- Sep 13, 2006
- 2,246
- 10
this is true
- Jul 10, 2005
- 1,754
- 305
Clean.
If these are any more than $90, this is just downright stupid.
Exactly.
If these are any more than $90, this is just downright stupid.
Exactly.
- Oct 26, 2004
- 1,131
- 44
they're ok, nothing special to me
- Jan 31, 2006
- 1,395
- 10
very sick blazer. the busted stitching is a nice touch.
sucks that people can't appreciate (or not appreciate)
a sneaker without worrying about what type of account its
dropping at.
sucks that people can't appreciate (or not appreciate)
a sneaker without worrying about what type of account its
dropping at.
- Jan 19, 2004
- 1,160
- 47
Dude the leather is super nice & soft. The inside is even smoother. They're MAD chill and def reminds me of a pair of Hiroshi just in a blazer shapeand different materials. Comparing it to something you'll find at Footlocker haha def you won't find a blazer like that at footlocker. I'm a blazerfan and its been a min since there's been a decent, not too loud blazer that i could wear to work.
- Nov 23, 2008
- 1,381
- 10
clean...i'd rock
- Mar 14, 2004
- 194
- 10
why couldn't nike just make this a GR?!?
- Jan 29, 2001
- 1,089
- 81
These will be at the NSW in Hollywood. $100 limited sizes
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,191
- 1,141
- May 1, 2006
- 6,396
- 16
- Apr 23, 2008
- 286
- 10
At all...LOL
- Feb 28, 2001
- 752
- 17
weak.... looks like a pair of adidas leather Stan Smiths....
D
Deleted member 40717
Guest
weak
taggpoppernj
Banned
- Apr 4, 2008
- 1,084
- 10
week
- Feb 26, 2008
- 73
- 10
Why hate just for the sake of it?
I BET NONE OF YOU HAVE ACTUALLY SEEN THIS SHOE IN PERSON.
I BET NONE OF YOU HAVE ACTUALLY SEEN THIS SHOE IN PERSON.
- Feb 26, 2008
- 73
- 10
pictures do not do this shoe justice at all.
- Jul 31, 2008
- 4,700
- 1,948
Haven't seen the shoe in person but the weird hole swoosh makes me not like 'em
- Feb 26, 2008
- 73
- 10
Like i said, you can't really judge until you see it. The holes your describing are perforated to look like the swoosh. From a distance it pretty muchmakes it look like a swoosh-less blazer. All the Materials used, from the WAXED leather, laces, to the lining of the shoe, are straight dope and gives the shoea clean look. Yes the laces are different. The leather is actually leather. Not to mention buttery soft! Similar leather to what they used on those Opium airmax 180s that came out a couple years ago, if anyone wants to bust their pair out the box for old times sake to get an idea. I suggest you do. Yes. That soft.Its all in the finer details!
- Sep 10, 2008
- 428
- 11
nice shoes, but no my type~
- Aug 16, 2008
- 659
- 10
picked them up... all I can say is QUALITY. Unbelievable quality. I would love to see this same Blazer Supreme Perf TZ executed in different colors, maybe agrey tone, maybe a red tone. Of course I must admit that I am biased because I love blazers and simple clean colorways. I can understand why people might notfeel that this one is anything special, its just a black and white blazer with a seemingly missing swoosh.
