- 279
- 94
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
I hate our offense if you can call it that. I want manziel but I don't think we get him
Closed
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jumpmanfromdabay,
- Start date
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
No! although he had a few nice moments, still not ready to be a full time starter..... if we had a dominate D then sure, but we don't, so yeah, NO!
- 12,443
- 1,194
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
Allen isn't
- 995
- 177
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
and a Rookie QB is?
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
i would take Manziel over McGloin anyday
- 995
- 177
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
and if he taken? then what?
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
make a move on Vick, McCown or Henne. i know, we will be in a tough spot if we miss out on Manziel or Teddy. we need a QB BAD!
- 12,443
- 1,194
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
I think we'll get a QB with the first 2 rounds for sure.
- 30,198
- 33,292
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
Agreed.
I'd rather have a young guy start and gain experience than waste time with Vick, henne or McCown.
- 3,636
- 609
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
I think if teddy or manziel aren't there we forget about drafting a qb
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
I'm somewhat inclined to agree.
- 995
- 177
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
Really bro? WOW!!!
- 279
- 94
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Texans, jags, and Browns need a QB. We ain't gettin Manziel
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
lol! i know man! i agree we need to take the best available player regardless, but McGloin just aint gonna cut it.
Really bro? WOW!!!..I know we got money to spend, but no more wasteful spending please ....how about drafting best possible player available since we need play maker on both side of the team. If Manziel happens to land on #5 we good to go, if not oh well...grab a QB in later rounds and let them compete with McGloin for Starting position ....
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
i would still make a run at Vick for a 1 year deal, McGloin just seems like a career serviceable backup
- 16,062
- 19,850
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
pretty much exactly how I would it. If teddy or manziel are not avaliable then I hope we trade down..
And yea Texans, jags and browns all do need QB's...but they also need a whole lot more than that lol that's why we're top 5 picks. No doubt Texans go QB tho.
Last edited:
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
i dunno,Shaub had a terrible year, but imagine Clowney and Watt together! WOW!!!! i don't think i would pass on that chance..... we shall see!
- 21,784
- 2,957
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2007
If Reggie really believes in his ability as a talent evaluator, I wouldn't be surprised at trading down. Whether I have faith that it would be the best decision given who's in charge is another thing.
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
i don't think trading down is a good idea, like we all said before, just draft the best player available and get in the FA mix, we need some Vets in here with winning experience as well, we will def see what Reggie is made of this off season.....
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
If Manziel is already off the board then I would be upset if we took Clowney or Barr
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
why? both guys seem pretty legit, no?
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
I meant wouldn't 
- 1,476
- 358
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
I meant wouldn't
- 279
- 94
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
Raiders need an identity and it's time to start being relavent. It's time for some star power. When's the last time we had a player who's jersey was cool to rock. Woodsons first tenure
- 30,198
- 33,292
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
