- 70,872
- 112,631
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Why take DSJ2.0 when you already have the original?
2024 NBA Draft Thread - the hawks might be on the clock
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by addict4sneakers,
- Start date
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I was sold on JJJ because Izzo usually has no idea how to use his best talent. Coach K on the other hand?
JJJ also wasnt offensive minded.
Cam on the other hand attempts 10+ practically every game while getting close to 30mpg.
- 70,872
- 112,631
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Look again. Finger slipped and accidentally hit post.Hope that’s you agreeingB Sox lol
Cam would be fine for the Knicks though.
- 28,498
- 16,986
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2003
Shooting 34% from 3 and 81 from FT? Look good for the next level.
dacomeup
Supporter
- 25,689
- 35,653
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- 73,041
- 98,797
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Wasn't Jaren Jackson playing like 18 MPG?
He was the textbook definition of drafting for potential. I thought he'd need more time but he's been an impact player almost instantly.
He was the textbook definition of drafting for potential. I thought he'd need more time but he's been an impact player almost instantly.
- 60,029
- 129,225
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
I wanted to see if JJJ was going to rebound with Gasol out of town but his leg fell off
- 70,872
- 112,631
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
He fouled too much.
Izzo also couldn’t somehow comprehend the idea of playing Bridges at the 4 and JJJ at the 5.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,091
- 25,733
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
22 MPG, yeah everyone figured him a project worth spending that high of a pick on.
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Exactly.
Na i'm off Cam. Hope he ends up being as good as ya'll say he can be, but I dont see it. I cant get behind a guy that gets that many minutes, gets plenty of opportunities, yet shoots horrendously on most nights when there's no pressure on him.
Na i'm off Cam. Hope he ends up being as good as ya'll say he can be, but I dont see it. I cant get behind a guy that gets that many minutes, gets plenty of opportunities, yet shoots horrendously on most nights when there's no pressure on him.
- 70,872
- 112,631
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Not really sure if I’m loving having both Ja and DSJ on the same roster. Especially when your FA targets consist of several other high usage type players.
- 60,029
- 129,225
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
No pressure? I don’t know about that one
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Would be completely ok with the Knicks drafting Ja or Garland.
Not on the DSJ bandwagon yet.
Not on the DSJ bandwagon yet.
- 30,250
- 33,366
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
Cams got the talent but he's a career volume scorer that does next to nothing when the ball isn't in his hands and disappears in games for long stretches at a time sometimes
Would like to see him put it together but I've had reservations on him since HS
Would like to see him put it together but I've had reservations on him since HS
- 73,041
- 98,797
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Jarrett Culver has to be the pick if we fall to #3 or worse
- 60,029
- 129,225
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
His game fits if you land the big fishes
- 28,498
- 16,986
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2003
If we land the big fishes we are probably better off trading the pick
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I hope we dont (ex: trading for AD).
Big fish along with cheap vets is a 3 year window. Gotta keep the young guys for after that 3 year window. Building for now and the future is the ultimate blueprint.
- 28,498
- 16,986
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2003
Lol why you editing your posts my man? You funny.
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I cant add a sentence now?
- 28,498
- 16,986
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2003
- 34,392
- 25,936
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Gotta chill on that refresh button buddy.
Not too invested in this draft as I was in past drafts. Only care about potential future Knicks.
Not too invested in this draft as I was in past drafts. Only care about potential future Knicks.
- 28,498
- 16,986
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2003
