Air Jordan 11 XI 25th Silver Anniversary ruined

10
10
Joined Jan 2, 2010

MY  BEST FREIND WAS SMOKING IN THE CAR AND FLICK A CIGGERETTE OUT THE WINDOW AND THE WIND BLEW IN THE BACK SEAT AND HE HAD HIS SHOES OUT AND THIS IS THE RESULT LMFAO
 
3,260
22
Joined Mar 15, 2005
Tobaccy is wacky, and by the looks of it, so are those shoes. Damn, I hope those are B-grades because they were looking okay until I saw these pics.
 

str1nger

Banned
318
11
Joined Sep 8, 2006
Sucks for him.. time to give up the smoking when you allow something like that to happen.
 
1,705
10
Joined Aug 15, 2007
lol they been ruined by having no jumpman lol true or not lol? Looks like they were worn for months even years because patent looks yellowed
 
95
10
Joined Nov 18, 2008
whats funny is that JB is making it easier for manufactuers(sp?) to produce fakes that look just like the "legit" pair. no jumpman? shape?...

these look fake.

look at the placement of the tag on the tounge..its supposed to sit in the 3rd eyelet..

anyways...

that sucks...but my question is..why were the shoes out anyway?
 

mr cool grey

Banned
259
10
Joined Feb 5, 2009
Those aren't B-Grades, thts just how JB makes XIs now
. Reason why I'll never buy this crap. The story was funny tho I literally laughed because that ciggerette thing always happens.
 

windycity7

Banned
2,791
10
Joined Nov 3, 2009
Originally Posted by shizzellman


MY  BEST FREIND WAS SMOKING IN THE CAR AND FLICK A CIGGERETTE OUT THE WINDOW AND THE WIND BLEW IN THE BACK SEAT AND HE HAD HIS SHOES OUT AND THIS IS THE RESULT LMFAO

so these are fake right op....that toe
 & that 2-tone leather
...........

these better be either

A) early release  b/c-grade
B) fake

cuz if these are authentic they shouldnt be yellow at all.....but knowing JB these might come pre-yellowed
 & if these are real i just save $165 again.....
 
319
11
Joined Sep 1, 2009
Originally Posted by MF178

whats funny is that JB is making it easier for manufactuers(sp?) to produce fakes that look just like the "legit" pair. no jumpman? shape?...

these look fake.

look at the placement of the tag on the tounge..its supposed to sit in the 3rd eyelet..

anyways...

that sucks...but my question is..why were the shoes out anyway?
I know that this is not the place to speak on fakes, nor am I praising them or supporting them. But I've seen have seen a pair of fake concords that were complete replicas (identical) to the 2000 retros. You're probably wondering, if  they were that on point, then how did I know that they were fakes?
When I saw them, it was 2009, and these things were brand new. Mind you, I said "BRAND NEW", not "un-deadstocked"
Where I was them, was one of the WORST (poorest) NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE COUNTRY: Acorn Projects West Oakland California.
They had a blue tented sole, but the shape of the 2000-2001 retro (smaller toe box). There was no way that these were real, but I dare say that they were beautiful (Start flaming now!!!).


It was worthy of showing other niketalkers. But 1. No fake topics and 2. You don't go around taking camra phone pics of someone's shoes in the jects. All I'm saying is, I'VE SEEN FAKES FAR SUPERIOR TO ANYTHING THAT JB HAS GIVEN US IN YEARS.
 
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now