Chocolate earth

All millionaires aren't out here living that outwardly luxurious lifestyle pa
 
I seent the receipts. 
Well where the reciept a for flat earth cause right now the round earth is only something I've heard about but not seen.... And I think you think o believe it's flat... I don't but they're are some wholes in round earth do you not agree fAm?
 
 
I seent the receipts. 
Well where the reciept a for flat earth cause right now the round earth is only something I've heard about but not seen.... And I think you think o believe it's flat... I don't but they're are some wholes in round earth do you not agree fAm?
The receipt is science. Only "wholes" I see are the ones in logic when it pertains to Earth or any other heavenly body being flat.
 
That doesn't make sense to me, but I think he was talking about something different

I'm just saying...The fact that you don't trust anything at all from NASA is preemptively disregarding a ton of answers to the questions you have

You say you don't believe in a flat planet, and I'm inclined to believe you, but the way you react to information that purports to confirm that theory and the way you react to information that refutes that theory would seem to hint otherwise

For something so obvious and laughable it should be easy to refute right? I'm just asking for something solid to prove its round and we can't even get that. Neil degrasse Tyson said it's an "oblate spheroid" so someone show me an image of that?
 
Fromt he Russians:

17m79zjpy0hbhjpg.jpg

This is clearly a composite image
 
Forgive me if this has been covered, but what benefit is there to keeping a flat earth a secret? Who wouldn't want people to know this and why ?
 
Last edited:
Well, what I'm saying is that there are known knowns and that there are known unknowns. But there are also unknown unknowns; things we don't know that we don't know.
 
The receipt is science. Only "wholes" I see are the ones in logic when it pertains to Earth or any other heavenly body being flat.

But science ain't the reciept because neither one of us is smart enough to understand it... Analogies are you g over our heads
 
Why can't I see stars from my window in NYC? There are no stars due to how light and in this instance cameras work. Science.

Na. If you think that pic is real then cool. But I disagree. People act like its impossible for us to have real time footage of our planet as a whole. When I get that I'll stop questioning. A pic from space but no stars are visible? Na.
 
Na. If you think that pic is real then cool. But I disagree. People act like its impossible for us to have real time footage of our planet as a whole. When I get that I'll stop questioning. A pic from space but no stars are visible? Na.
at this point how do you know the stars are real and not light tricks ? lets just throw away thousands of years of research because we have the internet now and we are all smarter than the scientists 
 
So by flat earth these DFs are implying the earth doesn't have a core, like seriously what the fu are these people actually trying to say here? that gravity just doesn't work the way its been proven to work? Earth is flat but the moon, sun, etc are spherical?

Have these people taken the time to think about our earth's magnetic field? and why we see auroras closer to the poles? like seriously wtf i'm seriously disturbed
 
Na. If you think that pic is real then cool. But I disagree. People act like its impossible for us to have real time footage of our planet as a whole. When I get that I'll stop questioning. A pic from space but no stars are visible? Na.

watch the nasa channel and you will see real time footage.
 
 
Why can't I see stars from my window in NYC? There are no stars due to how light and in this instance cameras work. Science.
Na. If you think that pic is real then cool. But I disagree. People act like its impossible for us to have real time footage of our planet as a whole. When I get that I'll stop questioning. A pic from space but no stars are visible? Na.
if you have no idea what the earth from space looks like because you don't believe any of the pictures of the earth taken from space, then where is your reference point to claim that these pictures are photoshopped or fake? 
 
and as for not seeing stars, cameras have three stops of dynamic range. Since the earth is bright from reflecting sun light, if you had the camera set to be able to see stars the earth would be way over exposed.

You can try this yourself, take a camera and take a picture of the night sky with the exact settings you would use during day time shooting. Your eyes will see stars but the camera wont
 
and as for not seeing stars, cameras have three stops of dynamic range. Since the earth is bright from reflecting sun light, if you had the camera set to be able to see stars the earth would be way over exposed.

You can try this yourself, take a camera and take a picture of the night sky with the exact settings you would use during day time shooting. Your eyes will see stars but the camera wont

i hope that kid is just trolling...he probably thinks HST photos are standard camera photos.
 
if you have no idea what the earth from space looks like because you don't believe any of the pictures of the earth taken from space, then where is your reference point to claim that these pictures are photoshopped or fake? 

Bro nasa themselves say the images are composite composite means composed of different elements.... It's not a real photo they say it's a bunch of photos linked together
 
Back
Top Bottom