- 5,215
- 837
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
Think its pretty simple... Tyson was the better entertainer.
Its easier to like someone and look pass their transgressions if they are fulfilling a need you have. Tyson entertained us and his outside life interested us.
Floyd is great in his own right, but to the casual fan, the media, pop culture... he isnt entertaining enough so therefore its really no true connection.
When it comes to "Money" aspect, you can only entertain or interest ppl for so long with your spending habits.. after awhile that rubs off and no one cares.
Its easier to like someone and look pass their transgressions if they are fulfilling a need you have. Tyson entertained us and his outside life interested us.
Floyd is great in his own right, but to the casual fan, the media, pop culture... he isnt entertaining enough so therefore its really no true connection.
When it comes to "Money" aspect, you can only entertain or interest ppl for so long with your spending habits.. after awhile that rubs off and no one cares.
Last edited: