Kevin Samuels Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't, that's why I asked if anyone could enlighten me.
Outside of the auction block where they would judge not only looks, but hair and teeth, fitness, ability to breed would be judged as well. A number would be applied at times, both numerical ranking and price. During the 80’s, the movie 10 came out, with Bo Derek as the standard. She was also credited with bringing braids into popularity, becoming the Bo Derek look. People then normalized a racist discussion on who came closest to the supposed standard that this blond haired white woman had set.
 
Outside of the auction block where they would judge not only looks, but hair and teeth, fitness, ability to breed would be judged as well. A number would be applied at times, both numerical ranking and price. During the 80’s, the movie 10 came out, with Bo Derek as the standard. She was also credited with bringing braids into popularity, becoming the Bo Derek look. People then normalized a racist discussion on who came closest to the supposed standard that this blond haired white woman had set.

Okay, so what you just did there was conflate two totally different arguments. The argument about women being judged on looks is simply about her appearance facial wise, how she looks (depending on the judge sans-makeup).

You're making an argument that it's not nice or not fair (correct me if i'm wrong) that we judge black women's appearance based on metrics that were used in slavery times to pick a fit servant.

And the only reason you are comparing the two from what i'm getting is they both used the number system to define value. Uh Okay. That's the only similarity connected between both examples.
 
You are not judging someone’s face, then applying a numerical judgement as a baby. Stop it. Waaaaaaaaahhhh! She’s not a 10!
Idk if they count, but they definitely have some type of rating they use. It's been studied by notable sources for decades. Read the article I supplied.
a43fdf25a171e28f59914e54f20d3cc0.gif
 
We come out the womb judging faces, it's biological:

Which of the 2 would u feel prefer to look at eating while eating across the table:
1617816093890.png
1617816136562.png
Will is a high-value man.

So if he is having an allergic reaction at dinner, a cooperative woman needs to keep her mouth shut, stop stressing him, and eat her damn salad

Dudes have learned nothing from Kev :smh:
 
Okay, so what you just did there was conflate two totally different arguments. The argument about women being judged on looks is simply about her appearance facial wise, how she looks (depending on the judge sans-makeup).

You're making an argument that it's not nice or not fair (correct me if i'm wrong) that we judge black women's appearance based on metrics that were used in slavery times to pick a fit servant.

And the only reason you are comparing the two from what i'm getting is they both used the number system to define value. Uh Okay. That's the only similarity connected between both examples.
I guess you've never heard of the slaves of a lighter complexion being better suited for indoor, big house work, 'eh? Since they were being deemed more attractive, and less scary toward guests than the real dark slaves.
 
Will is a high-value man.

So if he is having an allergic reaction at dinner, a cooperative woman needs to keep her mouth shut, stop stressing him, and eat her damn salad

Dudes have learned nothing from Kev :smh:
I know you're being sarcastic but will let his wife cheat on him and blamed himself. I believe that is NT's version of what a HVM looks like. :rofl:
 
Idk if they count, but they definitely have some type of rating they use. It's been studied by notable sources for decades. Read the article I supplied.
a43fdf25a171e28f59914e54f20d3cc0.gif
Again, I am talking about a numerical value being applied by adults, not the emotive concerns of a friendly face through the eyes of an infant. I have twin daughters, and I have read the studies.

And you have the nerve to post a white baby being afraid as well?

Shame.
 
I guess you've never heard of the slaves of a lighter complexion being better suited for indoor, big house work, 'eh? Since they were being deemed more attractive, and less scary toward guests than the real dark slaves.

No I've heard of light skin, that still has nothing to do with the inherent value of the number system. Let me re structure my point. If you were at a beauty pageant and you were a judge, and you had to judge 20 women, and you had to pick 3 to go to the semi-finals, then picked out of the 3, how would you rate them? You do understand you're making two totally different arguments and the number system being used isn't the problem right? A number isn't inherently bad, math isn't racist.
 
Why would your opinion not matter? Clearly you think his rating of Beyonce is wrong, that's an opinion.

incorrect. I don’t think his opinion is wrong. It’s a matter of preference and the more popular opinion is that Beyoncé is prettier. (That does not reflect my opinion) and of course I’m sure there’s some colorism ties to that popular opinion.
 
No I've heard of light skin, that still has nothing to do with the inherent value of the number system. Let me re structure my point. If you were at a beauty pageant and you were a judge, and you had to judge 20 women, and you had to pick 3 to go to the semi-finals, then picked out of the 3, how would you rate them? You do understand you're making two totally different arguments and the number system being used isn't the problem right? A number isn't inherently bad, math isn't racist.
Beauty pageants are subjective, and incredibly sexist. For years people have begun to realize the standards set by such events, actually lead to low self esteem of its participants.
 
incorrect. I don’t think his opinion is wrong. It’s a matter of preference and the more popular opinion is that Beyoncé is prettier. (That does not reflect my opinion) and of course I’m sure there’s some colorism ties to that popular opinion.

That depends on who you ask, I just might think Beyonce is more attractive than Kelly, It might have absolutely nothing to do with her skin complexion. But when people automatically go straight to complexion it makes it seem like everyone just hates dark skin people. After a while you can't tell the difference and everyones a colorist.
 
That depends on who you ask, I just might think Beyonce is more attractive than Kelly, It might have absolutely nothing to do with her skin complexion. But when people automatically go straight to complexion it makes it seem like everyone just hates dark skin people. After a while you can't tell the difference and everyones a colorist.

You just might. But I think that’s the problem already. Colorism does influence those ratings.
 
Beauty pageants are subjective, and incredibly sexist. For years people have begun to realize the standards set by such events, actually lead to low self esteem of its participants.

Okay, so can we judge? and how can we start judging in a way that we don't put numbers or value to a specific person or thing? People judge, You judge, unless you're a robot. How do you judge out of your favorite things least to greatest? Is a Honda equal to a Buggati?
 
Okay, so can we judge? and how can we start judging in a way that we don't put numbers or value to a specific person or thing? People judge, You judge, unless you're a robot. How do you judge out of your favorite things least to greatest? Is a Honda equal to a Buggati?
The whole beauty standard in these industries, including slavery, was created to make white people comfortable. Black women were placed at the bottom, for obvious reasons. You even have other ethnic groups who think that it is okay, even funny, to talk to Black women like this.....no regard, no respect.
 
Will is a high-value man.

So if he is having an allergic reaction at dinner, a cooperative woman needs to keep her mouth shut, stop stressing him, and eat her damn salad
If Allergic reaction Will Smith sat across the table from me I wouldn't eat b/c I'd just throw it up.
Again, I am talking about a numerical value being applied by adults, not the emotive concerns of a friendly face through the eyes of an infant. I have twin daughters, and I have read the studies.

And you have the nerve to post a white baby being afraid as well?

Shame.
I also sister have who I'm technically raising now that I think about it (or at the very least helping raise). My sister that I personally had to tell and teach that it was wrong to stare at, cry, scream, and or point at when she saw a boogerwolf and say "look" when she learned that word.

I even have an "ugly" mask that I had use to scare tactics on her w/ that "ew/look/ugly" **** got so out of hand:
IMG_6739.jpg


There's was this one time I was flabbergasted in the Target in City Point though. That woman just looked horrible. I'm cringing type this tbh. That lady had hair her on her ******* chest too. One the few times I've saw seen someone in person and associated them w/ being "ugly". She was definitely a non transwoman too. Must've been 5'9 w/ a slender Mark Henry build, matching denim jacket & pants w/ a floral shirt that exposed cleavage, and all white sneakers. I don't I've been in that Target since. Just a horrible moment in my life

What does the baby being white have to do w/ anything? It's just a baby.
 
Yes I have heard it, and that is why I am stating that it is indeed wrong. Again, the normalization of such standards and discussion, leads to discriminatory practices, those of unscrupulous origins. This is why they called Bo Derek a 10.

Man called Beyoncé a 7, Kelly Rowland a 9 but then has the audacity to call Bo Derek a 10.

But when I say the man is a c**n I’m wrong?
 
Man called Beyoncé a 7, Kelly Rowland a 9 but then has the audacity to call Bo Derek a 10.

But when I say the man is a c**n I’m wrong?
Oh he is an imposter, no doubt. I do not know if he called Derek a 10, but the movie industry of the time did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom