NBA Draft Thread 2011

Originally Posted by Buc Em

Lets see.......

Nash
Curry

D-Will
Aaron Brooks

Billups
Jameer Nelson
Calderon
Hinrich
Augustin
Mo Williams

Devin Harris
Holiday
CP3
Felton/Lawson

Parker
Rose
Conley
Jennings
Collison
Westbrook


That's how I would stack the best shooting starting point guards in the league. Where would Irving be?
Billups should move up a group, as well as CP3, Rose should probably move up 2 imo

and unless one of their fans comes in and really wants it for the draft ill take...

1. Kings
2. Pistons

since Knicks are taken
30t6p3b.gif


EDIT: didnt see that SacTown was taken. I'll take Detroit unless a die hard Pistons fan really wants to take them from me
 
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams

Originally Posted by cleansneaksonly21

Originally Posted by cleansneaksonly21

lets pre-mock it in here...
 cleansneaks: Utah Jazz

add it to the same post fellas DAMN 
roll.gif

cleansneaks: Jazz

PMatic: Bobcats

KnockoutNed: Cavs

Heirjordan15: Heat
nicedudewithnicedreams: Kings
Ecook0808: Bucks
 
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams

Originally Posted by cleansneaksonly21

Originally Posted by cleansneaksonly21

lets pre-mock it in here...
 cleansneaks: Utah Jazz

add it to the same post fellas DAMN 
roll.gif

cleansneaks: Jazz

PMatic: Bobcats

KnockoutNed: Cavs

Heirjordan15: Heat
nicedudewithnicedreams: Kings
Ecook0808: Bucks
 
Originally Posted by SmoothBalla

I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.

That's exactly what the argument is.
 
Originally Posted by SmoothBalla

I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.

That's exactly what the argument is.
 
quik1987 wrote:
SmoothBalla wrote:
I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.
That's exactly what the argument is.



No it wasn't.  You're trying to jump into another discussion when you originally said the following...

"No substantial champions have ever come out of Duke."

"The fact of the matter is that none of them are really winners."

What criteria are you using to evaluate whether a player is or isn't a "winner?"  And define "winner."

You realize basketball is a team sport?
 
quik1987 wrote:
SmoothBalla wrote:
I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.
That's exactly what the argument is.



No it wasn't.  You're trying to jump into another discussion when you originally said the following...

"No substantial champions have ever come out of Duke."

"The fact of the matter is that none of them are really winners."

What criteria are you using to evaluate whether a player is or isn't a "winner?"  And define "winner."

You realize basketball is a team sport?
 
Originally Posted by SmoothBalla

quik1987 wrote:
SmoothBalla wrote:
I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.
That's exactly what the argument is.



No it wasn't.  You're trying to jump into another discussion when you originally said the following...

"No substantial champions have ever come out of Duke."

"The fact of the matter is that none of them are really winners."

What criteria are you using to evaluate whether a player is or isn't a "winner?"  And define "winner."

You realize basketball is a team sport?

Dude you are obviously backtracking, but you still have no argument.
All you did was post stats next to each player. Which proves?............

Nothing.

I still take the UNC current squad over Duke from the squads YOU posted. 

As far as "recent" memory, you sure are vague with your terminology.

Lets not include the past ten years, because Coach K's track record of developing productive pros is 
sick.gif
 Go back further, and it only gets uglier, keep living in fantasy land though.
 
Originally Posted by SmoothBalla

quik1987 wrote:
SmoothBalla wrote:
I have no problem saying UNC > Duke if you want to factor in all-time alumni into the equation (as well as a few other programs) but that's not what this argument is about.
That's exactly what the argument is.



No it wasn't.  You're trying to jump into another discussion when you originally said the following...

"No substantial champions have ever come out of Duke."

"The fact of the matter is that none of them are really winners."

What criteria are you using to evaluate whether a player is or isn't a "winner?"  And define "winner."

You realize basketball is a team sport?

Dude you are obviously backtracking, but you still have no argument.
All you did was post stats next to each player. Which proves?............

Nothing.

I still take the UNC current squad over Duke from the squads YOU posted. 

As far as "recent" memory, you sure are vague with your terminology.

Lets not include the past ten years, because Coach K's track record of developing productive pros is 
sick.gif
 Go back further, and it only gets uglier, keep living in fantasy land though.
 
Originally Posted by JPZx

KAHNSY MAKE A MOVE.

My man, just wondering.....who on the wolves do you NOT want to see on the roster at the start of next season. Nevermind if there is a plausible way to get them off 
laugh.gif
, I am just interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.
 
Originally Posted by JPZx

KAHNSY MAKE A MOVE.

My man, just wondering.....who on the wolves do you NOT want to see on the roster at the start of next season. Nevermind if there is a plausible way to get them off 
laugh.gif
, I am just interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.
 
Ridnour
Webster
Darko
Flynn
Ellington
Telfair
Pekovic
Hayward

All of them are garbage. I've had enough of all of them.
 
Ridnour
Webster
Darko
Flynn
Ellington
Telfair
Pekovic
Hayward

All of them are garbage. I've had enough of all of them.
 
Lol at the dude who put Brooks in the top 4 shooting point guards in the league. Brooks just chucks up shots and shot 35% with the Rockets this season. 
 
Lol at the dude who put Brooks in the top 4 shooting point guards in the league. Brooks just chucks up shots and shot 35% with the Rockets this season. 
 
Originally Posted by Buc Em

Lets see.......

Nash
Curry

D-Will
Aaron Brooks

Billups
Jameer Nelson
Calderon
Hinrich
Augustin
Mo Williams

Devin Harris
Holiday
CP3
Felton/Lawson

Parker
Rose
Conley
Jennings
Collison
Westbrook


That's how I would stack the best shooting starting point guards in the league. Where would Irving be?


good list but i think jameer should lead the second tier of pg shooters
 
Originally Posted by Buc Em

Lets see.......

Nash
Curry

D-Will
Aaron Brooks

Billups
Jameer Nelson
Calderon
Hinrich
Augustin
Mo Williams

Devin Harris
Holiday
CP3
Felton/Lawson

Parker
Rose
Conley
Jennings
Collison
Westbrook


That's how I would stack the best shooting starting point guards in the league. Where would Irving be?


good list but i think jameer should lead the second tier of pg shooters
 
i was rewatching some clips of kemba and i think people are really underrating his athleticism

his quickness in the half court is really amazing and on transition he changes direction at full speed
 
i was rewatching some clips of kemba and i think people are really underrating his athleticism

his quickness in the half court is really amazing and on transition he changes direction at full speed
 
Back
Top Bottom